Saturday, February 14, 2009

The Angry, Angry ... Left?


Dear wankers: Sure, let's talk about civility, shall we? Hang on a minute and let me get comfortable.

P.S. I know where you're coming from, Warren, as one Patrick Ross of Edmonton once threatened to track me down and physically assault me, so I can sympathize.

P.P.S. Dear Google: "Patrick Ross." "Threats." "Violent." "Physical assault." There we go -- that should keep any potential human resource co-ordinators busy for a few minutes when they get Twatsy's job application.

38 comments:

sooey said...

Ohferchrissakes - if someone somewhere wasn't threatening that drama queen with something, he'd have to make him/her up.

It's probably him mom: "How many times have I told you to stop bothering people on the Internet?! Don't make me come in there, you little braunshirt!!"

sooey said...

I know, I know - consider myself sued.

Dee said...

He's only important to that little corner of the world. Most Canadians don't know or care or care to know.

sooey said...

I lurve his blog, though. So "pot/kettle". He should call it, "J'accuse!"

Patrick Ross said...

You're really just begging for that libel suit, aren't you?

Just keep pushing.

Ti-Guy said...

Fuck off, Twatsy.

Kelseigh said...

Because we know you're a real "follow through" kinda guy, huh Twatsy?

KEvron said...

"Just keep pushing."

not even with jennifer's dick.

KEvron

CC said...

Jesus, Twats, it's Valentine's Day ... shouldn't you be out boning some chick who finds mullets really, really hot instead of cruising my blog?

Loser.

Patrick Ross said...

Interesting logic.

Shouldn't you be out looking for girls who find lying attractive rather than libelling people on your blog?

LuLu said...

*sigh*

Patrick, Patrick, Patrick, it's not libel if it's true -- I'm glad I could clear that up for you, muffin.

Now toddle off like a good little mullet-sporting cretin and stop making a fool of yourself for once.

the rev. paperboy said...

So Patsy, do you deny that you threatened CC with assault?

Ti-Guy said...

So Patsy, do you deny that you threatened CC with assault?

It would have been less insane if Twats had just done that. But it was only a small part of an entire campaign of intimidation.

Sick little thug.

Patrick Ross said...

ROTFL

Lulu, I do so much enjoy when you cretins prove your functional illiteracy.

This particular post in question wasn't a threat of physical violence. It's a promise to reveal his vile attitudes and statements to his friends, family, and neighbours.

Glad I could clear this up for you. You may now resume lying about the entire affair.

Boris said...

According the Criminal Code:
264.1 (1)Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
...

You have done exactly that Patrick. The wording is loose enough to capture the "threat" aspect even if, in your so cleverly worded post, you don't explicitly state that you personally are going to assault CC.

wv=muntra (hafta use that somewhere, good word_

Patrick Ross said...

Boris, if you hadn't previously proven yourself to be irredeemably dogmatic and obtuse, I would be shocked to hear that from you.

My sincere advice for you is to stay out of the legal profession.

Not to mention the matter of Canadian Cynic publishing Richard Evans' address and actively and explicitly encouraging people to stalk his children.

Yet I've never seen or heard a word of protest to that anywhere from yourself.

That actually fits the criminal definition of criminal harassment. But I guess it's OK when your side does that, isn't it?

CC said...

Oh, dear ... I'm guessing that this is one of those times where Twatsy is going to get all pedantic and demand that words should be interpreted, you know, correctly. As opposed to all the rest of the times when he insists on mangling the English language when it suits him.

Poor Twatsy ... you know that two can play that game, don't you? Hey, I know ... how about the time you accused me of "stalking Dick Evans' kids to their school"?

"After all, there's something inherently mean about expressing amusement about an assassination attempt on a Canadian politician. Encouraging people to go after a political opponent through his children? To the point of stalking them to their school?"

Really, Twats? I did that? Considering I haven't been to Calgary in over 15 years and -- oh, yeah -- I can't possibly have "stalked them to their school" since I haven't the foggiest idea where their school is.

So, Twats, that libel suit? Bring it the fuck on. And we'll see what horrendous shit you can get into after publicly accusing me of being a child stalker when I can trivially demonstrate that that is pure bullshit.

Feel free to find a good lawyer, Twats. And make sure you point out the libelous accusation you made against me above. Then see how long it takes him to stop laughing before he boots your sorry ass out onto the street.

P.S. And as for the hideous sin of posting Dick Evans' address, well, holy fuck, Twatsy, but you're behind on your reading.

Loser.

CC said...

P.S. Just to drive this home, let me reproduce Dick Evans' own words from that last link, where he hoofs Twatsy in the jewels good and proper:

"I've not complained that my personal information was posted. CC's correct in his assertion that I posted my children's names myself. I don't have a problem with that.

So as for posting Dick's personal info about his kids, if you have a problem with that, Twats, feel free to take it up with Dick.

Loser.

CC said...

P.P.S. I'm going to bed now, but I'll make sure I check first thing in the morning as to how Twatsy shifted the goalposts overnight. You know it's coming. Yes, you do.

Boris said...

1) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard Evans.

2) "Irreedeemably dogmatic and obtuse"? Oh, I like that, especially coming from someone who self-identifiies as asshole.


3) Speaking of which, I often feel pity for people who feel they must constantly use such a term as self-descriptor. I supect they're suffering from some developmental handicap or mental health issue that either translates into some sort of perpetual teenage psycho-emotional state, or some deep seated self-loathing. Because, really, who wants to be known as an asshole? I don't know you from jack, so perhaps there's some other perfectly rational reason for your constant petulance and obnoxiousness, but I can't think of what that might be.

4) You appear to fit the CC (no pun intended) definition of threat of assault, so that is what I called you on. If you care to explain why your post does not fit this definition, have at it, because that would be a lot more credible than advising me to stay away from the legal profession.

Cherniak_WTF said...

1) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard Evans.
Richard is an other funny fucker - I'm still waiting for him to sue me as he has said he would....
Maybe the NAMBLA obsessed too busy jerking off to little boys or whatever he likes to do...

Ti-Guy said...

Gawd, we need something new to update this boring drama.

Show us yer tits, Twatsy!

Cherniak_WTF said...

Ohferchrissakes - if someone somewhere wasn't threatening that drama queen with something, he'd have to make him/her up.
Seems that way...

Zorpheous said...

Man, some people just don't when to stop, sheesh, even Anonologue knew enough to drop the bone, tuck tail and run for cover,... and it has been nearly three years since we heard from that scumbag blogger.

CC said...

Hi, kids ... I'm up and putting on the coffee and I notice Twats has vanished again, which is exactly what happens each and every time he realizes he just had his nads handed to him. It's what happened after I mocked him for predicting no federal deficit, and it just happened here as Twats realized his claims were pure shash, given that I can provide links to that effect.

Here's some free advice, Twatsy -- stay at the kids' table this time. The grownups are trying to talk here.

Loser.

CC said...

"Show us yer tits, Twatsy!"

Good thinking, Ti-Guy -- after all, what can possibly go wrong? Oh ... that.

I think I just fwew up in my mouf.

liberal supporter said...

I missed another PR visit?
Waaaaaa!

"Show us yer tits, Twatsy!"

He's a little coy but in the right venue, I think he would

CC said...

Curiously (but predictably), for someone who was all over this thread, Twatsy has mysteriously vanished now that I've called him on his bullshit.

I'm guessing he's closeted himself away with a thesaurus, trying desperately to figure how to mangle the English language in order to define as a "child stalker" someone who's never actually, you know, stalked children.

Give Twatsy time -- his eventual weaselly, goalpost-shifting rebuttal is generally worth the entertainment value. In a train wreck kind of way.

P.S. And, yes, even I'm getting bored with this. You can paddle someone in public only so many times before the novelty wears off.

mikmik said...

I remember Pat stating something to the effect that 'you better not run into me because you don't know what scary (or dangerous or something) is' because I told him "let's meet where I'm at see scary/dangerous."
I do remember threats, if not explicit, then thinly veiled.

Patrick Ross said...

Oh. My. Dear. Lord.

This is how you losers spent Valentine's Day?

Holy fuck does that ever say a lot about you.

Now, that being said, I simply have to address the following little nugget of dishonesty:

"Poor Twatsy ... you know that two can play that game, don't you? Hey, I know ... how about the time you accused me of "stalking Dick Evans' kids to their school"?

Really, Twats? I did that? Considering I haven't been to Calgary in over 15 years and -- oh, yeah -- I can't possibly have "stalked them to their school" since I haven't the foggiest idea where their school is.
"

This particular statement is not only riddled with lies, it's also incredibly stupid.

I didn't accuse you of stalking Richard Evans' kids. What I did was accurately state that you encouraged other people to do it for you.

You encouraged -- hell, you flat out instructed -- your sycophants to figure out which school Richard Evans' kids go to so they could go there and spread malicious innuendo about him -- malicious innuendo which you yourself were providing them with.

So not only do I stand by my comments, but if you want to make a legal issue of them, I invite you to do precisely that. I will happily stand in court, clobber you with your own words, then happily provide them to the judge so he can recommend that charges of conspiracy to commit criminal harassment be pressed against you.

My dear fucking god you are a child. You actually want to sit on your blog and fucking preen to other idiots who, like yourself, clearly had nowhere better to be on Valentine's Day than working themselves into a hilariously outraged lather over the idea that someone would challenge their master over libelous comments?

I'm going to put it to you this way: it's clear that none of you had dates yesterday. There's also clearly a very good reason why.

Idiots.

Frank Frink said...

Was little Patrick (and I do mean that in the 'little Elvis' sense) getting busy yesterday? Do tell.

wv = (hehe) "rutro". A faint memory of sex in another era.

LuLu said...

Do tell.

Oh please -- now poor Patrick is going to have to find his latest edition of Penthouse Letters to copy from.

Ewwwwwwwwwwww.

liberal supporter said...

Oh come on PR, I used the "you had no date for Valentine's" routine over at neo's an hour ago. Please come up with original material.

But continuing in that vein, I suspect that in addition to your usual nightly knob polishing, for Valentine's you were polishing the motorized goalposts which you just displayed here.

Wasn't it YOU that wants to sue? What happened to that? You must have received a quote from a lawyer, since now you no longer sound like you intend to sue. You instead want someone else to sue you, and you only have to show up and present your "case". You must realize that your case would fail, since you need a lot more than public information and a suggestion that someone inform authorities, such as CAS and the kids' school administration, about an unstable person who could be dangerous in the real world. Criminal harassment involves repeated persistent and unwanted harassment. Calling the cops on someone when there is reason to believe they are a danger to someone is not harassment.

So, given the fact that there would be no damages possible for you to make any money out of this, and you would be out of pocket for a lawyer, it makes sense you now want to be sued. What exactly would you be sued for? Libeling a pseudonym? Being a laughable buffoon? Sorry, these are not actionable, but you hope nobody will notice. Instead you expect someone to be as foolish as you are, and sue you in some way that would not be a case.

You just want the soapbox. And you want someone else to pay for your soapbox. Typical, really.

Frank Frink said...

'Do tell' was rhetorical. I'm afraid Penthouse letters is likely not.

wv = "preworaj", destined to be bigger than the ShamWow.

Patrick Ross said...

ROTFL

I really do enjoy when Liberal Supporter proves himself to be a complete and utter idiot -- which is basically every time that he opens his mouth.

Canadian Cynic was the one who opened his mouth and started whining about statements that were actually 100% factually accurate as somehow being libelous.

If he wants to sue over them, I'm fully ready to defend that case and I will gleefully watch that case escalate into criminal proceedings.

Which it would. The extremely weak standard of evidence CC is using and his malicious intent speak for themselves.

If you weren't irredeemably stupid, you'd know this.

Once again, LS, I'd advise you to stay out of the legal profession.

As for my own legal plans against Canadian Cynic, I'm not going to comment any further on that parcticular matter until such a time as futher comment is warranted.

Sheena said...

As for my own legal plans against Canadian Cynic, I'm not going to comment any further on that parcticular matter until such a time as futher comment is warranted.

why did I hear Yosemite Sam's voice in my head just now

Frank Frink said...

why did I hear Yosemite Sam's voice in my head just now

You heard the silent 'varmint' at the end of that sentence, too? Kewl!

liberal supporter said...

Once again, LS, I'd advise you to stay out of the legal profession.

Hey bonehead, you gave that "advice" to boris. You have never given me that advice.

Please try to keep your facts straight. They have a big thing about checking that sort of thing on cross-examination.