Monday, December 24, 2007

Let's be careful with that analogy there, Mike.


The National Post's Michael Coren wants us to know that our relentless criticism serves only to strengthen him:

Their Disbelief Is My Strength

I suppose it's the greatest joke of all. Deliciously ironic as well. My Christian faith has been profoundly encouraged by those most eager to smother it.

Dear Mike: A lot of us are also firmly opposed to Catholic priests buttfucking altar boys. I'm hoping you don't draw the similarly logical conclusion from that.

Lack of self-awareness, symptom number 639.


Fetus-fetishist SUZANNE gives us an early Christmas present:

When they can't compete and win, they don't want to play. Typical feminists. Watch this. If conservatives win the neutral categories, they're going to complain that the process has been "hijacked".

And let me tell you, SUZANNE is not one to put up with this tasteless, sleazy, online, poll-oriented "hijacking."

Oh ... wait.

Can someone order a smarter batch of Blogging Tories? I need more of a challenge here.

BONUS CATHOLIC DUMBASSITUDE
: From the "Fetuses 'r' Us" HQ sidebar:

6-Year-Old on Way to Sainthood

(Zenit.org).- A 6-year-old Italian girl who cheerfully endured the amputation of her leg and offered it in union with the sacrifices of Christ may become the youngest canonized non-martyr saint.

Awwwwwww ... even if you're not religious, that's a great story. Seriously. How did that turn out, by the way?

Benedict XVI approved Monday the decree recognizing the heroic virtue of Antonietta Meo, who died of bone cancer at age 6 and a half.

Um ... well, then, that's not quite the "Jesus loves you, and they all lived happily ever after" warm and fuzzy meme I was expecting, was it?

MORE DOUBLE PLUS GOOD SNARKITUDE
: Larry Moran points out how the Dumbfuck-o-sphere is throughly miffed by the organized freeping of online reviews, for which the obvious solution is, of course, a counter-attack of organized freeping of online reviews, until it blows up in their faces, after which they're shocked -- appalled, I tell you -- by the Leftist bullies who engage in something as infantile and classless as the organized freeping of online reviews.

You only wish you could write stuff that unintentionally hilarious.

Ba-ZINGGG!!!


Heh. Indeed:

"What do we really know about human evolution? Even before this discovery, there was no clear evidence that any fossil was anything other than fully ape or fully human. Homo habilis was the closest thing to something that was in between, and that was because tools were found nearby and it was presumed that Homo habilis used them.

"What we are left with is more evidence of a fossil record reflecting sudden appearance and stasis, which does not support Darwinian theory, and arguably falsifies it."

First commenter:

"While we're at it, I think the fossil record suggests that these things were actually skeletons that lived underground."

Commenter: 1.
Really, really, really stupid blogger: 0.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

No Blogging Tories...

...were harmed in the packaging of this product. They only served as models.

Hey Raphael....



From a Pretty Shaved Ape to you.

True Patriot Portraits #1

With iridescent blue plumage SUZANNE shares her wisdom and charm.

Sweet Baby Jesus.


You know, there are times when I honestly think the BTs can’t possibly surprise me anymore. And then something like this steaming pile of crap comes along and I’m once again forced to lower my expectations.

I'm speechless. Seriously ... I am completely without speech.

Holy fuck -- the overwhelming stupid!


Try to believe that someone like Blogging Tory Brian Lemon could actually write this:

Some people have a pathological hatred of GWB which is kinda weird.

Yes, Brian ... why don't you lecture us on "pathological hatred?" Seriously, is it even possible to be less self-aware than that?

P.S. We have, in fact, already whacked the living crap out of Brian. Now I'm just going for bonus points.

The War On Christmas

Having just visited the eminent Mr. Driftglass, I see he has solved the laziness issue by recycling posts from Wars on Christmas past. Smart him! Since I happen to have a bit or two stashed away for such occasions, I steal his idea. Now then, not much of anything brightens the War On Christmas season quite like kicking the crap out of the ever obnoxious John Gibson from Faux News Nutwerks. So here then, a blast from the past, this hails from my old and abandoned blog, The Terminal Velocity of Sausage, Dec. 2005 edition.




christmas. the holidays. a season of giving. celebrating the birth of the christ child. a time of peace, joy and good will to all men (and women too, right? they're sort of like men, but they smell better). every year the sacred advertisers remind us of bargains and the must-have items, for which the son of god sacrificed his life. this is the season most cherished by believers around the world. why, right now, the christian citizens of the holy lands are scouring the arid hills, looking for pine trees. its a tradition! and just like in the bible, news of the son of god, born to a virgin, is heralded throughout the world, by a fat nordic elf. for in olden times, the elven folk were revered as tinkers, toymakers and sys-admins.

but some bad people want to take all of that joy away. imagine, the long, dark nights of december stripped of popcorn strings, non-biodegradable, mylar tinsel and twinkle lights. no more sad anthropomorphic snowmen. no more flying arctic ruminants. rudolph, we hardly knew ya. but fear not, citizen, all the news that's fit to scribble has your back. (cue thin lizzy's classic: the boys are back) oh yea, fox's dyspeptic duo are on the case. answering the cries of the woefully oppressed and vast majority of americans, watch as john gibson plays cockrobin, to big bill o'reilly's wingbatman. in this episode they set their steely gaze on those insidious fiends, the...

"Anti-Christmas Warriors"

"I was away for a few days and the war on Christmas exploded."

thank gracious that john gibson was protected from the blast by his exoskeletal hair.

"Bill O'Reilly's been leading the charge and uncovering tons of places where someone is trying to change the name of the tree or change the name of the season."

gosh, wingbatman, you sure are swell. is that the sound of bowing and scraping? if o'reilly and gibson lead a charge, it'll be straight to the craft table and god help any interns that get in their way. but what of this tree? it has a name? oh, that's right, the appropriated religious symbol tree. but the season, come on now. don't be messing with the name of the season. i mean, i was like every other kid in school, we counted the days, hours and minutes, from the first whisper of snow to the last second when the buzzer sounded, and we were off. there was nothing like it. we'd laugh and wrestle in the snow, our breath steaming as we dreamed about all the things we'd get, all the things we'd do, the treats to eat and the days off school. man. nothing ever beat the holiday season. a week off school, well more like nine days when you count the weekends, that was awesome. entire days to spend at the rink playing pick up hockey after laying in bed for hours. lots of time to watch tv, except all the good stuff got bumped for crappy specials, with has-been stars singing medleys and trying to look sober. my favourite, getting to stay up until midnight on new years eve, what kid didn't love the holiday season?

"You'd think saying the word Christmas would kill some people."

oh but what if it could? talk about a wet dream for these guys, 'hey sanjay, christmas.' *thud* imagine the cheery jingle of laughter as o'reilly wades through the corpses of the unbelievers.

"On my own network, ultra lefty liberal Neal Gabler called me a demagogue for even bringing the subject up. If Neal were in charge I'd be sent off to a Khmer rouge re-education camp to make sure that there is no war on Christmas was beat into my head."

never one to shy away from wielding an unwieldy sentence, eh john? perhaps using demagogue, is just a polite way to avoid having to call you a whore, what with your new book being called, 'the war on christmas', soon to be discarded in a bus station toilet near you. a round of applause for mr. gibson's delicate rhetorical restraint. as the concise oxford would have it, a factious orator appealing to the prejudices of the masses, demagogue, shoe and fit. mind you, gibson's a simple sort, he probably thinks the word means he's somehow a democrat, on account of it starts with the same letters. but this is a war, damn it...right? and in war, people who disagree with you also want to send you thirty years back in time, to be tortured by a monster who was created by illegal acts of war and depredation, committed by an american republican president. makes sense.

"But par for the course, Neal is almost always wrong. And his co-panelists on Eric Burns' show "FOX News Watch" are so fatigued from trying to counter his out in deep orbit diatribes that they hardly put up a fight anymore."

and by extension, or projection if you prefer, john gibson is almost always right. perhaps that fatigue is just the failure of empty talking points to serve as coherent rebuttal to an argument, but hey, what do i know? maybe fox just needs to hire a better class of commentator.

"Another guy on television somewhere called me the worst person in the world."

oh stop bragging. o'reilly scored a trifecta.

"I tried to imagine how that could be possible, like maybe the guy is seeing my hair on the real worst people. You never know. Maybe this explains why he could say such a thing."

well, the worst people should have the worst hair. or perhaps keith olberman just likes to call an arse an arse. as for explanation, the wounded pretense is more than just a bit coy, coming from a man who, only paragraphs ago, stated that a liberal commentator would ship him off to the khmer rouge, if he could.

"Look, denial is the name of the game with the anti-Christmas warriors. They deny they are changing the name of the Christmas tree. "Everybody knows this country has been calling the thing a holiday tree or a giving tree. Where did we ever get the silly idea it was a Christmas tree?"

oh, oh, made up quotes! that's the best. i love made up quotes! "the christmas insurgents are fighting a rear guard action to rename all conifers, christmas." oh, i love the new kitchen cabinets, is that knotty christmas? imagine how much cheerier funerals will be, when the deceased is laid out in an old christmas box. i don't have a tree, but if i did, i'd call it a brutus tree and i'd hide all of popeye's spinach under it.

"The same thing with the war. They are denying it is happening. Accusing me of making up a phony war. But none will say the incidents in my book didn't happen. Instead they say it's just a few people who've gone over the top, not really a countrywide movement."

at first i goggled. i re-read those first few sentences a couple of times. then i realized, he's still talking about this trivial, made up kerfuffle, he's not talking about the war. what is at issue, is a backlash against what christmas has become, a high pressure sales pitch that starts in autumn and builds relentlessly for weeks and months. its a mall powered juggernaut of commerce, manipulation and excess. the hearth and home, traditional christmas still exists in hundreds of thousands homes. a quiet time for the gathering of friends and families. some religious, some not. and i am quite sure that muslim, hindu, hopi and the other kinds of french-americans, all look at a lit up conifer and see a christmas tree. aren't they pretty. they aren't overtly religious and you're welcome to them. but things like nativity scenes in government buildings are pretty graphic representation of one religion and could be seen as official sanction of that religion. plus, they're usually pretty tacky looking anyway.

"Well, I think not. I hear it all the time from my e-mailers and from callers to the radio shows I do and from people who walk up to me on the street."

ahem, when i meet people who agree with me, they tell me that i'm right and that proves it.

"It's like the secret bombing of Cambodia. It was a secret from everybody except the people getting bombed. Same deal here. People trying to keep Christmas in schools and parks and libraries and city halls know about the war on Christmas."

gibson has a point here. it seems quite obvious that he has indeed been getting bombed. and hitting the pipe as well, i'd guess. i suppose, if you're going to go for a stupid and inappropriate analogy, you should go for the stupidest and least appropriate one available. to even pretend that a parallel can be drawn is a dishonesty that borders on pathological.

"The people waging this war are trying to keep it secret. But it's too late. They have been outed."

outed. outed. does he mean that...no. it can't be. fags hate christmas? because you just know how mr. gibson feels about gay rights and all. well, i for one can't believe it. none of my queer friends would pass up the opportunity to celebrate, dress up, decorate and (worst of all) socialize.

"That's My Word."

you say that as though you're proud john. but your word isn't worth the methane that delivers it.

Dear KKKate:


Who knew you actually had the brain capacity to multi-task? In a one-line post, you manage to take a shot at progressives and the mentally disabled - proving once again that there really is no bottom to that barrel you keep scraping. Bravo, you KKKrazy KKKid, bravo!

God bless us, everyone!


It’s a Christmas miracle.

For nearly four years I've been blogging on the Western Standard site. Now that the magazine has stopped publishing its print edition, and Matthew Johnston has bought the Standard's online assets, it makes sense to start my own blog. I'll still post items on Matthew's WS site from time to time as well, I'm sure.

Thanks to Kevin Steel for helping me set this site up.

The potential for snark could be off the charts. And that luuuurvly picture of Ezra in the top corner? That, my dears, should be posted under the Urban Dictionary's definition of Backpfeifengesicht.

It's a stupidfest.


Looks like Mitt Romney, the Ken-doll of candidates, is trying to give the Huckster a run for his money in the vaunted “Who’s the Dumbest Republican” category.

First a little background. When Romney gave his not-so-anticipated yet anti-climactic “Faith in America” address on December 6th, he said:

“I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.”

He then repeated this claim last Sunday when he appeared on Meet the Press with mouthpiece Timmeh Russert.

Seems pretty straightforward, right? Just one of those feel-good, special interest stories. Except for one tiny little problem. It never happened.

In the interest of full disclosure, Dr. King did indeed march in Detroit in June of 1963, but Romney’s father, who was governor of Michigan at the time, was not present. According to reports, Gov. Romney led a later Detroit march but Dr. King was not present.

And here’s the kicker ... even if the two men had marched together, it would’ve been impossible for Ken-doll Mitt to have “seen” it. Seems he was on a two-year mission for the Mormon church in Le Havre, France; which, as you know, is pretty far away from Detroit.

For those of you keeping score at home, let’s recap. The Ken-doll’s father didn’t march with Dr. King, the Ken-doll didn’t actually see the march that never happened so basically, the Ken-doll is a big fat liar.

But it gets better. CBS News gave the Ken-doll a chance to clarify his remarks (emphasis all mine):

CBS News: “Did you actually see — with your own eyes — your father marching with Martin Luther King?”

Romney: “My own eyes? You know, I speak in the sense of I saw my dad become president of American Motors. I wasn’t actually there when he became president of American Motors, but I saw him in the figurative sense of he marched with Martin Luther King. My brother also remembers him marching with Martin Luther King and so in that sense I saw him march with Martin Luther King.”

Later he said, “I can’t even give you the time frame. I just remember that we talked about it. My brother also remembers my dad having spoken about the fact that he did not do political events on Sunday but that he decided at the last minute that he was going to break that self-imposed rule and participate and I think he did so on a Sunday as I recall.”

He added, “You know, I’m an English literature major as well. When we say, ‘I saw the Patriots win the World Series, it doesn’t necessarily mean you were there — excuse me, the Super Bowl. I saw my dad become president of American Motors. Did that mean you were there for the ceremony? No, it’s a figure of speech.”

That is some outstanding logic. If by outstanding, I actually mean absolutely pathetic. Can’t you just picture his handlers off to the side in full-blown hissy fit, waving their arms while mouthing “Shut up. Just shut up!”

This is gonna be fun.

*Snicker*.


Indeed.

Dear wanks: Here's why actual "dialogue" is not an option.


One of the more common whiny laments from the Canadian Retard-o-sphere is that we on the "Left" simply refuse to get into any sort of meaningful discussion with them. Instead, we childishly just sit over here and call them rude names, which just proves how utterly unequipped we are to have a substantive conversation on the issues. Mercifully, Stageleft explains why that position is absolute crap.

In a nutshell, those on the Right are, almost without exception, thoroughly uninterested in what we on the Left have to say and even go to the trouble of physically avoiding having to listen to it, as SL documents in his "Case the First":

(Interestingly, when I pointed all this out to the gentleman in question, with great civility, I was subsequently blocked from further comments).


Furthermore, I'm aware of numerous examples of Canada's progressives who show up at right-wing blogs and who try to get involved in the discussion to point out, say, flaws or inaccuracies in the original post, only to be contemptuously dismissed with infantile sputtering such as, "Oh, man, it sure is easy to yank their chain" or "Here come the unhinged moonbats again!". And, for sheer assholitude, there's always, well, this kind of snappy comeback. Yes, Brian, we all noticed you. Are you happy now?

Frankly, in all of the examples I've seen of progressives who pop by conservative blogs to try to have a conversation, I've yet to see a single example of said conservative replying along the lines of, "Hmmmmm ... you know, you have a point, I wasn't aware of that. I guess I was wrong." Not once. Ever. (Feel free to supply counter-examples.)

So what's the point in wasting any time trying to engage these yahoos? We've tried that, and it didn't work, so all that remains is to point out that they're dishonest, retarded fuckwits and continue to mock and ridicule them. And if they don't like that, well, they might consider treating their commenters with more civility and responding to the actual issues. And if they don't, well, then they really have no right to complain about being described as dishonest, retarded fuckwits, do they?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!


Don't some people have better things to do? Really.



SHRIEK! SHRIEK!! LIBERAL MEDIA BIAS!!! SHRIEK!!!!!!


Quick ... someone should warn Sandy about this. Suggesting that Il Steverino is just a big meanie? Why, that's just ... just ... mean.

Fucking National Post -- bunch of anti-conservative, liberal-biased cocksuckers, the lot of them. I await Sandy's imminent outrage with bated breath.

AFTERSNARK: I particularly like this hideous falsehood from pathological liar Stephen Harper:

Mr. Harper's Conservatives are less popular today than they were on voting day 2006. After 22 months in power, poll after poll pegs them in a tie with Stéphane Dion's Liberals, if not inexplicably slipping behind.

The Prime Minister's short answer is to dismiss the numbers.

That's right, Steve -- it's not like you're obsessed with polls or anything. What a fucking putz.

Stick a fork in him ...


... he's done.

It's all where you place the starting line, isn't it?


As a bonus bit of ass-whacking for Brian Lemon's insipid post on the superduperdeliciousness of George W. Chimpster here, let's examine a little more carefully his excerpt from the diseased brain of Clownhall's Larry Kudlow, shall we (emphasis added)?

Against all odds, and despite the usual drumbeat of criticism, President George W. Bush has had a very good year. The troop surge in Iraq is succeeding. America remains safe from terrorist attacks. And the Goldilocks economy is outperforming all expectations.

Pause.

"America remains safe from terrorist attacks."

Why, yes ... yes, it does. In fact, Americans have never been safer than under the current administration. Well, as long as you discount that spot of unpleasantness back on Sept 11, 2001, of course, which you're always allowed to do since it's kind of inconvenient, which is why, when you're talking protecting America, you should always start the clock on Sept. 12, if you catch my drift.

It's really quite entertaining to watch members of the Ya-Ya Wankerhood drool on and on about how safe America is, provided you get to exclude Sept 11, 2001 from consideration. Apparently, even though Bush was going to keep Americans safe, it was only on Sept. 12 that he decided that he really, really meant it, so you can't hold Sept. 11 against him, 'cuz that would be unfair, ya know? I mean, who could have imagined ... yadda yadda yadda.

And the utter lack of hideous terrorist attacks since then? Clearly, due to President Superchimp's manly, steely-eyed resolve, even though it would be equally logical to suggest that it was only the Democrats retaking Congress in 2006 that's prevented any further loss of life since then.

Really, wanks ... if you want to whinge on about how safe is America, how about you cop to 3,000 dead Americans having happened on your watch? Your president, your hideously-incompetent administration; therefore, your dead Americans. Because for people who can't seem to stop blubbering on about, "But ... but ... but ... Bill Clinton!", you all seem to have real problems remembering what happened before Sept 12.

P.S. American Congressional Democrats: Keeping America safe from cataclysmic meteor impacts and alien invasions since November of 2006.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Sometimes, snark just fails you.


Um ... wha?

GW Bush - Greatest President Ever?

In the past, in this virtual rag, this commentator (pretentious enough for you?) has stated unequivocally that George W. Bush is an American Hero of historic stature. He's proven my point in the past year, despite being pilloried on a daily basis by the miscreants trying to get his job.

I got nuthin'. Seriously, I got nuthin'. I think I'll just sit here, bleeding from the eyes or something.

Harperisms.


Crowbar in aisle 4, please ... Big Daddy’s got his foot stuck in his mouth (emphasis gleefully added).

When Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper tried to explain in a year-end interview why he'd met the Dalai Lama in his Ottawa office, it was clear he wanted to show respect for the exiled Tibetan leader. Unfortunately, it didn't quite come out that way.

"I met the Dalai Lama in my office but I meet everyone in my office. I don't know why I would sneak off to a hotel room just to meet the Dalai Lama. You know, he's not a call girl," Harper told OMNI television.

He quickly added: "As I say, he's a respected international spiritual leader."

In his endless quest to take cheap, petty little shots at the Liberals, Big Daddy once again shows himself to be a complete assclown.

Hat tip to Cherniak_WTF in the comments.