... until my Rule 4.33 Application hearing on August 20. Nothing really new to report this morning, other than that if Patrick does not file and serve a proper and relevant Response Affidavit by the end of this coming Friday, that's when I can at least legitimately argue that it would be too late and should be rejected by the Court.
Given that my Application and Affidavit were filed and served on July 15, Patrick will have had more than enough time to craft a response and, if he fails to do so, it's not clear there's any point in him even showing up at the hearing since he won't be allowed to present any arguments without having filed that Affidavit suitably in advance.
Time is running out for Cheeseburger Boy.
BONUS TRACK: I just checked in on Twitter and Patrick is currently obsessing over someone named Guy Felicella, so if he whines that he just didn't have the time or energy to get his Response Affidavit in on time, I will place before the Court his 137 recent tweets about whoever the fuck that is.
Patrick might be the most cluelessly self-sabotaging yahoo on the planet.
MORE BONUS: It's worth pointing out that, if Patrick whines about how he should not be held accountable for having done fuck all for well over three years with respect to the lawsuit that he filed, it was back in 2023 when he openly admitted that he was being lazy and dragging his ass on this:
so I don't think he's going to get any sympathy from the Court.

1 comment:
If he's really going on about Felicella, I presume he must be spouting off about mandatory treatment for addicts ... an idea that is as illegal as it is non-viable.
Smith might have legislated it into existence, but don't expect it to survive its first court challenge. Not only is forced treatment demonstrably ineffective, the legal implications of declaring someone incompetent to make their own medical decisions are much more far reaching ... and the courts are already sending signals that they don't like that.
Of course, Patrick understands that about as well as he seems to understand his obligations under the law.
Post a Comment