Honest to God, what are you supposed to do with this?
But if there were a 100% safe method of administering water to a fetus, without mixing the amniotic fluid to the water, it would be possible to baptize a baby.
It’s not excluded, it’s just that parishes don’t have the equipment/know-how.
Yes, that's our Little Suzie Retard, calmly and dispassionately explaining why, no, there's no real reason that parishes can't baptize fetuses (while sneakily transmogrifying the word "fetus" into the word "baby" in that first sentence and hoping no one notices). But, dear God, it gets so much better:
There is a shortage of infants to adopt. There are many older kids. But those older kids were wanted in the first place, but their parents’ parenting rights were terminated. Unwantedness does not lead to unadopted children.
I'm sorry, but what the fuck does that even mean? Can someone identify the point in that gibberish?
I have not adopted any but adoption is not a single-person decision.
Translation: Adoption is a noble calling that will make a difference in the life of someone's unwanted child and will mean one less abortion. I'm sorry, me adopt? Fuck, no, why would I want someone else's squalling brat?
There are many older children to adopt, but the reason they remain unadoptable has nothing to do with the shortage of people wanting to adopt.
No, Suzie, it has to do with the fact that your holier-than-thou, sanctimonious Bible-whomping buddies have no interest in anything less than lily-white perfection.
It's truly amusing to read condescending shrews like SUZANNE diss everyone else's heart-rending decision to terminate a pregnancy because of obvious physical disabilities in the fetus, but who have absolutely no interest in adopting and are clearly not all that keen on the thought of adopting anyone that falls anywhere short of their idea of perfection. If the hypocrisy were any thicker, you could do the backstroke in it. But Suzie's not done with Teh Stupid:
The difference is that while sexual intercourse might not always be desired, children should always be wanted.
That’s the difference. Every child who exists (including those in the womb) should be wanted. And I’m not just stating an ideal. I am stating what everyone should do.
Dear Suzie: You are so incredibly fucking stupid, words almost fail me at this point. When you speak of your idea of what the perfect world "should" be like, you are by definition "stating an ideal." That's what the word means, you jaw-dropping imbecile.
Is it too late to call Social Services and have Suzie's children taken away? For their own protection?
9 comments:
It's hard to argue an irrational point, I guess.
I think SUZANNE is the word you're looking for.
Monomania: Pathological obsession with one idea or subject. A partial insanity in which psychotic thinking is confined to one subject or group of subjects.
Pretty much why I stopped even going there. Debate? What debate...SUZANNE is merely repeating the same debunked crap over and over again, missing the point entirely that while it nice for her to express her opinion on what should be, it doesn't mean what is and it doesn't mean she can take away the right for a person to control their body.
Sweet jebus that woman is pure insanity on a stick.
The stupidest part is when she states, "When I debate, people refuse to accept my factual arguments, like the fact that the fetus is a person."
Nothing like starting a discussion by simply assuming your conclusion. She really is fucking bonkers. I feel sorry for her kids. Seriously.
Thanks, deBeauxOs. That was the pathology I was thinking of last night at JJ's place but I just could not remember the word.
There's no point in trying to debate or argue with a crazy person.
I think that last quote of hers is incredibly wrong - it reads better as "The difference is that while children might not always be desired, sexual intercourse should always be wanted."
But if there were a 100% safe method of administering water to a fetus, without mixing the amniotic fluid to the water, it would be possible to baptize a baby.
It’s not excluded, it’s just that parishes don’t have the equipment/know-how.
!!!
That's the kind of new thought that needs to be brought to particle physics.
I love it~!
Let's fuse, baby!
She has kids?
How did she manage that? I'd have thought "Insert tab 'A' into slot 'B'" was clearly beyond her comprehension.
Post a Comment