Sunday, November 05, 2006

Historical revisionism, wingnut-style.


You just know the after-the-fact rationalizations for this are going to be entertaining:

During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, President Bush and his aides sternly dismissed suggestions that the war was all about oil. "Nonsense," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld declared. "This is not about that," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

Now, more than 3 1/2 years later, someone else is asserting that the war is about oil -- President Bush.

As he barnstorms across the country campaigning for Republican candidates in Tuesday's elections, Bush has been citing oil as a reason to stay in Iraq. If the United States pulled its troops out prematurely and surrendered the country to insurgents, he warns audiences, it would effectively hand over Iraq's considerable petroleum reserves to terrorists who would use it as a weapon against other countries.

And, by the way, we've always been at war with Eurasia.

1 comment:

Zorpheous said...

But didn't we win the war against Eurasia years ago? I don't think your sources are reliable CC.