Over at Li'l Suzie Dumbfuck's place, SUZANNE and the rest of the fetus fetishists have their tampons in a twist over the unspeakable lack of civility of (allegedly) referring to new octuplet mom Nadya Suleman as a "freak show" or comparable to a "clown car."
"How dare you be so mean and disparaging?" ask SUZANNE and the SUZETTES, as if there's absolutely nothing untoward about an indigent mother with six young children suddenly deciding she wants eight more. Why, the nerve of suggesting such a thing!
Hello:
Octuplets’ mother wants Oprah to turn her into a $2m TV star
THE single mother of octuplets born in California last week is seeking $2m (£1.37m) from media interviews and commercial sponsorship to help pay the cost of raising the children.
Nadya Suleman, 33, plans a career as a television childcare expert after it emerged last week that she already had six children before giving birth on Monday. She now has 14 below the age of eight.
Um ... excuse me? This woman wants 2 million bucks? And wants to be taken seriously as a "childcare expert?" Why? What has she done to warrant such attention? Does she have a legitimate background in child care? Credentials? Degrees? Professional experience?
Oh, wait, I get it. She wants all this attention simply because she had eight kids simultaneously! In other words (and try to follow me here because this is important), she thinks she is entitled to all of this not because of any genuinely laudable accomplishments, but because -- here it comes, here it comes -- she is a freak show.
That's it. That's all. Nothing more.
While Suzie Dumbass is getting bent out of shape by the thought of anyone else dismissing Suleman as a freak, Suleman herself is riding that freak horse as hard as she can and trying to make a living out of it, which suggests that Suzie's outrage is more than a little misplaced. If Suze doesn't like the suggestion of freakishness, she might suggest that Suleman stop marketing herself as one.
P.S. Dear JJ and Fern: For fuck's sake, why do you waste your time over there? SUZANNE's ability to argue dishonestly and in bad faith is exceeded only by Twatsy's. And not by much. Find something better to do, and leave SUZANNE to emotionally scar her children for life all on her own. You're better than that.
LET THE RETROACTIVE RATIONALIZATION BEGIN. Oh, dear God:
Angela Suleman told reporters Friday that doctors implanted far fewer than eight embryos, but they multiplied. [!!!!!!!]
Wait, I'm sorry ... we're suddenly supposed to think better of this woman because, allegedly, she didn't try to have eight kids at a time, it was just a fluke? Oh, that has such interesting consequences since, in the first place, it implies that Suzie Dumbshit really does have a problem with an indigent mom with six young kids deciding to have eight more; otherwise, why would she be seizing on this new information as a defense? But here's the better part.
SUZIE clearly didn't know this (alleged) news earlier when she was defending Suleman's decision to have eight kids. This is new material and SUZIE had no knowledge of it when she was clearly standing by what, at the time, appeared to be Suleman's choice to have eight kids. In short, SUZIE doesn't get to go back and retroactively defend her position based on information she did not have.
As I said earlier, JJ and Fern, why do you waste your time this way? SUZIE is an addlepated cretin and the best you can hope for is that her kids eventually grow up and not murder any abortion providers. Now just leave it alone and move on.
BY THE WAY, there's evidence to suggest that Suzie Dumbshit's latest defense is pure crap (emphasis added):
Suleman says that her daughter had eight embryos successfully implanted last year and, despite being given the option to abort one or more for the purposes of minimizing risks associated with multiple births, refused to do so.
There it is. Eight embryos implanted. Now would someone please tell Suzie to shut up and fuck off?
AND THAT'S WHEN THINGS TURNED UGLY: Apparently, everyone is getting increasingly creeped out by all of this. So who are the only dumbasses who are still defending it?
Please don't make me answer that.
16 comments:
How about "matryoshka doll"....
No shit. WV = subho
What about all the babies she ISN'T having. I should think SUZANNE would be more concerned about them.
If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say Nadya Suleman saw the Duggars on TLC and decided she could get famous by doing them one better. Which makes it all the worse.
But that's just me.
Gives whole new meaning to the phrase "Stop littering."
I know, I know, I know.
I will try harder to resist.
SAINTE-NITOUCHE added a little personal comment after the quote from the news item.
Angela Suleman told reporters Friday that doctors implanted far fewer than eight embryos, but they multiplied. [!!!!!!!]
Those [!!!!!!!] mean that Blob Blogging Wingnut knows that Suleman is lying. Implanted embryos do not multiply on their own. Lying liars know when other lying liars are lying.
So you're saying that Suzie Wingnut doesn't believe that claim? Interesting. In any event, she's still in the awkward situation of defending a mother of six with no visible means of supporting from choosing to have eight more kids.
These people scare me.
You know how this is going to end. We've seen it before... Eight Misbehavin' (episode seven, season eleven) ;-)
Gosh we might as well all get into the act. Isn't there some treatment out there that can permit me to nurture a fetus to term on the fat around my kidneys?
I'd name it Suzanne.
She's nuts.
However, wrt the "childcare expert" stuff, the Guardian does cite some education in that area:
"...Neighbours have reported that she worked as a psychiatric technician before she began having children. After that, she attended college, studying child development. She graduated with a bachelor of science degree and returned to do a masters. She last went to a classroom in the spring of 2008."
She's still nuts, of course.
I did notice her educational background in that later article I linked to, but I don't know whether that makes me feel better or worse.
To think that someone really should know better, and clearly doesn't? That just creeps me out even more now.
P.S. And let's not get into the credibility of a "childcare expert" who is so clearly obsessed with children. That's just plain unhealthy. How would you trust the advice you were getting?
I hope she has decatupletts next AND gets a deadbeat dad boyfriend whose old lady shows up on Springer, "he ain't supportin' the nine, no wait, how many kids I got... oh yeah, ten kids he got already".
Oh please, oh please, oh please, gawd...
sooey, part of the point, and I do acknowledge that I tend to be indirect and tangential, of my earlier comment was... well, you know what happens in that Simpson's episode.
The Springfield octuplets get shunted out of the public's imagination and resources when someone in neighbouring Shelbyville gives birth to nontuplets.
Life imitating art. You know it's coming.
So, sadly, the slant on this has now turned to the horrific phenom of the 'serial/mass birther' with all the attendant 'the public feels betrayed' woe.
What came first here, the obsession of media coverage over fertile women, making them celebrities, or someone seeking celebrity by outdoing the record? In hard economic times, this beats missing blonde children any day for upping circulation.
If it had successfully put forward that there was something mentally unstable about her when she first came to their attention at three months, what position could the doctors have taken? Would they have sought state control to abort the fetuses? I can imagine there'd be just as many shocked headlines.
Fuck off, Wayne. Nothing's changed since the last time, you ignorant tool.
Post a Comment