Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Punk'd.


It seemed like a moderately funny gag with minor potential entertainment value: Write a horrifically tasteless post, wait for the inevitable fuming, sputtering, frothing outrage from whatever members of Canada's Idiot-sphere were sufficiently clueless to fall for it, then quietly point out that I had done nothing more than emulate their current hero, Ann Coulter:

John Hawkins: You've caught a lot of heat for a couple of quotes you made. In your column three days after 9/11, you said, "We know who the homicidal maniacs are.They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." You also said in an interview with the New York Observer, "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." Do you stand by those quotes or do you think that perhaps you should have phrased them differently?

Ann Coulter: Ozzy Osbourne has his bats, and I have that darn "convert them to Christianity" quote. (Thank you for giving the full quote. I have the touch, don't I?) Some may not like what I said, but I'm still waiting to hear a better suggestion.

RE: McVeigh quote. Of course I regret it. I should have added, "after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters."

(I even e-mailed the rest of the contingent here at CC HQ, warning them not to take offense to that post as I was going somewhere with it so just be patient.)

Yes, it would have been amusing to catalog the outrage, only to point out the raving hypocrisy contained therein. But, in retrospect, that gag seemed destined for failure. It was simply too obvious.

Why would I, after railing against eliminationist rhetoric all these many months, suddenly jump into it waist-deep myself? You'd think that would make someone suspicious. Then there was my blatant taunting at the end of that post -- kind of a dead giveaway, wouldn't you say? You'd have to be fairly stupid to have missed that. And then there were the commenters.

I had to frantically delete the first comment from a regular commenter, who perkily congratulated me on how well I reproduced Coulter's death-speak. Grrrrrrrr. But when Niles followed up, I figured, fine, there's no way I'm going to be able to ride herd on that thing so, screw it, I'll let commenters give the game away entirely and see what happens.

Which brings us to the obvious question -- who in the Canadian Idiot-sphere, given every possible clue that this was a prank, and with even my commenters explaining it to them, would still have the required level of screaming, cementheaded retardedness to fall for this, hook, line, sinker, tackle box and copy of Angling Times? Ladies and gentlemen, behold:



That's right, kids -- even when the entirety of Stephen Taylor's Special Education class had the sense to smell a prank when someone clubs them over the head with it, Canada's favourite mullet walked face-first into the woodchipper.

That comment was deleted but, surprisingly, I wasn't the one who deleted it. Fuck, no, I wanted the evidence of Twatsy's douchebagitude, so one of my trusty co-bloggers must have done it. Luckily, I'd already taken a screenshot since I assumed that, in an increasingly rare moment of lucidity, the Twatster would suddenly wake up sweating, realized he'd just made a planet-wide ass of himself, and dash back to delete the proof. Too late, though. And, for the true amusement value, I left the remaining comments up there but, yes, I will delete any more from Kid Thunderbolt Cash Assholery Twatsitude Mulletbrain.

The only remaining entertainment value will come from Twatsy desperately trying to salvage his dignity while people from coast to coast are laughing hysterically at him. But he can do that on his own blog. I'm already going to have to fumigate here.


Monday, April 12, 2010

Worth Repeating

The biggest tragedy is that it wasn't Stephen Harper and his crew of misfits.


Pondering the recent airplane crash in Russia that killed the president of Poland and 95 others, one can only think how useful it would have been if that plane had been loaded with Stephen Harper and his coterie of useless, corrupt hacks and hangers-on. What a shame.

Cue totally predictable Canadian right-wing outrage in three ... two ... one ...

So ... how's that whole Afghanistan thing working out for ya?


Oh, dear:

MacKay snubs Karzai on Afghan visit

Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s erratic behavior of late, including suggestions he may join the Taliban, have a “corrosive impact” on Canadian troops, the Defence Minister says.

Just back from Afghanistan, Peter MacKay told The Globe and Mail today that was the message he delivered to two senior Karzai government ministers.

It occurs to me that that's the sort of shit one gets into when one really wants to play dress-up soldier and swagger around looking tough, but doesn't really think very far ahead.

And here's where we jutaxpose ...


Courtesy of this morning's CBC:



So ... we're even? Is that how this works?

Ah, civility, how I miss thee.


Regular readers here at CC HQ already know how Blogging Tory and Depends spokesperson Sandy Crux likes to chide the rest of us regarding, you know, civility, and decorum, and politeness, and crap like that. And yet ... and yet ... here's Sandy's sidebar:



And if one pops over to Jabba the Roy's, one finds his permanent reference to women as pigs:



In any event, Sandy would still like to lecture you on civility and decorum. Dr. Roy notwithstanding.

Getting on-board the MaryT bandwagon.


Blogging Tory "BC Blue" predictably mocks journalists just trying to do their jobs, but somehow feels it necessary to post a photo of CP's Jennifer Ditchburn to go with the snark.

Good thinking, Blue. Hey, maybe your next post can announce where she lives. And if that doesn't quiet her down, you can take a page out of Hunter's book and just ominously threaten her. In a generic, non-specific way, of course. Just enough to stay on this side of the Criminal Code of Canada. That seems to be all the rage with your right-wing bunkmates these days.

And remember, above all -- stay classy.

Deranged!


It's not Maria "Dodo" Nunes' perpetual cluelessness that's so entertaining, it's that even the chronically-uninformed Blogging Tory "Iceman" tries to talk some sense into her and fails so spectacularly.

Ironically, here's Maria, getting ready to plunge back into the job market. Good luck with that, dear.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Blogging Tories: The unintentional hilarity.


BTer "Barrel Strength" gets all principled ... or something:

Your correspondent has previously posted several times with the title “This too shall pass”, where Obama backtracks on his previous commitment or policy.

Yeah, going back on your word ... dontcha just hate it when some useless, yammering douchebag does that?



This job has lost a lot of its challenge.

And here's where we juxtapose ...


Canada's conservatives would like to take a minute from shrieking incessantly about how Omar Khadr is absolutely, positively, no doubt about it, a terrorist and we sure as hell don't need a trial or any other kind of time-wasting legal procedure to tell us that, to lecture us on how it's bad form to pre-judge anyone before all the evidence is in. No, really, that's what they want to lecture you about. I'm not kidding. Seriously.

Submitted without comment.


Really, what is there to say?



Suzie All-Caps' fetus fetishism, and Suzie All-Caps' intelligence level. A truly disturbing combination.

Kate McMillan, Small Dead Animals and eating your own dog food...


... or, in this case, reading your own blog. Here's Kate, getting all tinfoil-hat whackjob and conspiratorial:

"It became very clear that we, the Protective Detail, would have our hands full at this event."

Canada’s charter does, on the other hand, establish some pretty explicit protections for free speech. But what happens if you ask for protection from authorities when someone is infringing on your right to speak at a public forum?

Not much it seems.

In a real country, with real rights, and real journalists, this letter would provoke a national media scandal and formal investigation - but it won't, for all of the reasons stated above.


Posted by Kate at April 10, 2010 5:21 PM

Letter? What letter? Oh ... this letter:

... The letter details what happened at Ms. Coulter’s last stop, in Calgary, just days after rowdy students at the University of Ottawa forced organizers to cancel her appearance there.

Really? Rowdy students forced the cancellation of Ann Coulter's U of Ottawa appearance? I'm pretty sure that's not true, because I read it ... um ... oh, right, I read it here.

SDA's Kate McMillan: Because reading what your own co-bloggers write is too much like werk.

Bright, shiny thing!!!


I'd be embarrassed to be this predictable:



Tune in later today when we learn that it's everyone's fault but Helena's. And ADSCAM!!!

AFTERSNARK: I think we can all see where this is going. Here's Hunter, sounding ominously threatening:

Maybe it is time for Conservatives to start using lefty tactics against them. Maybe it is time to take a few bully boys/girls down a notch or two.

This would be following hot on the heels of conservative commenter and stalwart "MaryT", who wrote recently:

As there are no private lives for the families of current or former MPs, guess we should start investigating them. Didn't Chretains [sic] son get arrested for rape or something like that. Whatever happened in that case. Did he get special treatment from the courts.

Wonder how many of those lib mps have paid to keep their kids out of trouble re drugs, DUIs, failing grades or whatever. Somebody will surely be finding out.

I wonder about the lives of journalists families. Got to be something there.

Good thinking, ladies, why don't you ratchet up that rhetoric a bit more and make personally threatening noises toward your critics? I'm sure there's no way that can end badly.

BONUS TRACK: Regular visitors to CC HQ might remember that this idea of tracking journalists and digging into their private lives didn't just start. Why, a couple years back, it was one of Stephen Taylor's Blogging Tories, "Conservative Queen," who announced to all and sundry that one Kady O'Malley was clearly consorting with the enemy and, by God, she had the photographic evidence!

And how did that end? Oh, dear ... not so well. But I'm thinking that neither Hunter nor MaryT will be deterred by this. Let the creepy journalistic stalking and bullying begin!

Stephen Taylor must be so proud.

P.S. I wonder where Canada's conservatives get the idea that the proper approach to annoying journalists is to, you know, take them down a notch or two, nudge nudge, wink wink, nice job you got there, be a shame if anything happened to it? Oh, right.

You can see why they love themselves some Ann Coulter.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

And here's where we juxtapose ...


The delicate wallflower that is Adreal MacNalexander is supremely offended:

Don’t Compare Women To The Female Dog Variety

In the meantime, Adrael's Blogging Tory bunkmate "Hunter" has no problem with equivalent comparisons:

I like Shelly Glover too. But, as Paul M says, why does it have to be a woman? Maybe Maxime would be a good choice, or better yet get rid of the SOWs altogether.

Perhaps Adrael should clean up his own aggregator before presuming to lecture others on civility and decorum. It's just a thought.

OK, that's just weird.




What is so odd about the above?

The rise and spectacular implosion of Helena of Tory.


Nicely done.

Dear incredibly stupid Canadian conservatives:


Please stop your screechy, pathetic whining about how Helena Guergis is innocent until proven guilty, and they're just allegations, and everyone's ganging up on her just because she's Conservative.

It was Stephen Harper that stripped her of her Cabinet position. It was Stephen Harper that booted her sorry ass out of the Conservative caucus. And it was Stephen Harper who handed her over to the police.

So if you want to bitch and moan, bitch and moan to Stephen Harper, and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

Christ, but you people are whiny.

Stupid people of the world unite!


Sure, over there will be fine.

You are not going to believe this.


As of 11:14 AM, Sat, Apr 10:



How is that even physically possible?

P.S. And, yes, that's Sandy Crux, being as dumb as a sack of manure. As usual:



Jesus Christ, but that woman is retarded.

OH, AND SHE'S A PATHETIC, WHINY, CENSORING DOUCHEBAG, TOO: If you examine the screenshot above carefully, you'll see that there were two comments. I remember them -- both of them took Sandy to task for one reason or another.

Those comments are now gone, replaced by a single comment from one "Fay," whose job appears to be to stroke Sandy's brow and soothe her worried countenance.

Canada's Blogging Tories have some nerve bitching about how other people run their comments sections.

And here's where we juxtapose ...


Canada's conservatives would like to take a short break from slagging U of Ottawa Vice-President Academic And Provost François Houle, demeaning his intelligence, questioning his integrity, denigrating his commitment to fairness and suggesting he is a fascist that eats babies and barbecues kittens alive, to lecture you on how personal character assassination is a bad thing and doesn't become you at all.

Integrity!


Shorter vice-president of the Conservative electoral district association in Helena Guergis' riding of Simcoe-Grey Paul Shaw: "Well, sure, we could consider nominating someone who isn't a useless hack, total bimbo, shrieking harpy and utter failure who just resigned in disgrace and who's married to a coke-snorting, impaired driving influence peddler, but that's a bit premature, don't you think?"

Accomplishments!


Anger management issue queen and useless hack Helena Guergis:

"I have worked hard for Canadian women, and I am proud of my record of my accomplishments on their behalf," she added.

Refresh my memory -- what exactly did she accomplish on behalf of Canadian Women? Be concise. Be specific. Give examples. Show your work.

Awesome quote of the day.


Blogging Tory "Hunter":

Seriously, is PM Harper the only adult in Ottawa?

I got nuthin'.

Sure, let's talk about civility.


Blogging Tory "Hunter," whose patronizing blog posts on civility and decorum have become legend in the bloggysphere, goes all piggy over at Iceman's place:

hunter said...

I like Shelly Glover [for Status of Women cabinet position] too. But, as Paul M says, why does it have to be a woman? Maybe Maxime would be a good choice, or better yet get rid of the SOWs altogether.

Tune in tomorrow when Hunter stops referring to women as "SOWs" long enough to continue lecturing others on civility and decorum.

None dare call it "stalking."


Here's ubiquitous right-wing commenter and increasingly dangerous nutbar "maryT," taking recent developments like a grown-up:

maryT said...

As there are no private lives for the families of current or former MPs, guess we should start investigating them. Didn't Chretains [sic] son get arrested for rape or something like that. Whatever happened in that case. Did he get special treatment from the courts.

Wonder how many of those lib mps have paid to keep their kids out of trouble re drugs, DUIs, failing grades or whatever. Somebody will surely be finding out.

I wonder about the lives of journalists families. Got to be something there.

I'm sure there is, Mary. And I'll bet hiding in the bushes outside their dining room windows late at night is just the way to get started. You let us know if you come up with anything, dear.

And if any of those journalists meets with an unfortunate accident in the near future, at least we'll know where to start looking.

Friday, April 09, 2010

Prorogue!


OK, now it's time for a re-calibration.

Dear Blogging Tories:


I'm thinking that all that recent, gleeful howling of yours over Jack Layton moving a woman's arm out of the way so he could see a TV in a sports bar is starting to look kind of insignificant, isn't it?

Curious How...

PM Stevie can claim that... "Last night my office became aware of serious allegations regarding the conduct of the Honourable Helena Guergis. These allegations relate to the conduct of Ms. Guergis and do not involve any other Ministers, MPs, Senators or federal government employees."

What a lovely and sweeping disclaimer! Yet the Liberals, not precisely an ethical lot in their own right, are now a full decade, four leaders, a handful of elections and a couple of conservative governments removed from Adscam and still carry the mantle of universal corruption. I guess the Conservatives just get to have a lot more standards, since they're doubled and all. Way to go Conservatives, way to go.

Thank ya, thank ya very much.


Geez, it's about time, where you guys been?



But, really, here's the best part of that page, a two-day-old link:

The Canadian Sentinel
April 7, 2010
Liberal Obsession With Guergis
Actually Helping PM, Tories


Sure, let's go with that.

Where's Captain Canada when you need him?


When there's potential Liberal financial skulduggery about, who ya gonna call? Why, Stephen Taylor, of course.

I'm sure he will apply himself equally tenaciously to this.

Hi, kids.


CC HQ:



Where the effete elite meet to call someone a "douchebag."

Punting Helena.


Oh, dear. Boy, I'll bet there's a bit of buyer's remorse happening right about now.

Still waiting ...


For the love of mutt, how hard can this be?



We'll check back later.

I'm curious ...


... what exactly does it take for Stephen Harper to decide that someone shouldn't be a Cabinet Minister anymore? Seriously.

Yeah, about that influence peddling, Rahim ...


If this puts a smile on my face, does that make me a bad person?

Guergis’s future in doubt; husband Jaffer faces more accusations

OTTAWA — Helena Guergis, the minister of state for the status of women, may face new political peril after revelations emerged Thursday that her husband, former Conservative MP Rahim Jaffer, was using one of her taxpayer-funded parliamentary BlackBerrys and that he had boasted of his connections to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office to further his private business interests.

A spokesman for Harper, Dimitri Soudas, said any claims Jaffer may have made about his access to Harper or the PMO are untrue.

“Any accusation that the Prime Minister’s Office has opened doors for Rahim Jaffer or his associates is false and it is also absurd,” Soudas said.

So here's my question: If Jaffer has been selling himself based on his alleged access and influence with the Stephen Harper Party of Canada, and the Party categorically denies any such thing, does that constitute fraud on Jaffer's part? Seriously, the entertainment value here just never stops, does it?

LEAVE RAHIM ALONE! I could continue mocking official Conservative Party comfort girl Sandy Crux and her tear-streaked attempts at defending Jaffer but, in the interests of effective time management, I'll just summarize it for you:



Really, that was worth the two minutes, wasn't it?

It's an epidemic, I tells ya!


Regular commenter Kelseigh brings the following gem to our attention:

Canada’s Minister of State for Status of Women Helena Guergis isn’t the only Conservative MP who has staffers writing to media.

Ottawa-Orléans MP Royal Galipeau’s legislative assistant, Kyle Simunovic, was caught this past summer writing letters to the editor without identifying himself as a Conservative staff member. And while Simunovic’s letters weren’t a glowing review of his boss, they did attack a federal politician of a different political stripe.

In his letter to the Timmins Daily Press, where he was identified only as Kyle M. Simunovic of Timmins, Galipeau’s legislative assistant took aim at NDP MP Charlie Angus.

Simunovic took the Timmins-James Bay representative to task for his “Canada flag fit – call it maple leaf 2.0” in which Angus “whined and complained” yet again about Canada’s flag pins manufactured in China.

A reader with a sharp eye quickly responded to the letter, noting Simunovic is on Galipeau’s staff.

“Simunovic is on the payroll for the Conservative Party of Canada and sent a letter to discredit a member of parliament and worse, he obviously attempted to mislead residents of Timmins by passing himself off as an ‘average citizen,’” Mike Peever of Iroquois Falls wrote.

While Simunovic’s ties didn’t go unnoticed in the Timmins Daily Press, the same letter ran on TimminsToday.com with no mention of his Conservative affiliation.

We all await the similar, surreptitious primping of Conservative MP John Baird by one of his anonymous underlings, during which Baird will be described as a principled man, a strong man, resolute, with a firm chin, sparkling eyes, golden tan ... buff ... chiseled ...

Sorry, where was I going with this?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!


Oh, fuck me:



Leave it to a Conservative to be utterly unfamiliar with the concept of a "principle."

OOOOOOH, NICE CATCH: Alison observes that Rahim is still pimping himself out as one of the Party faithful:



I'm thinking that someone who's actually a member of the Party might want to have a chat with Rahim about that.

POPCORN! Oh, my. Oh, please.

AH, GLOBE AND MAIL, you so amuse me:

Rahim Jaffer removes party logo from website amid influence allegations

Rahim Jaffer, the former Conservative MP who had a recent and highly publicized run-in with the law, removed the Conservative logo from his website on Thursday after allegations that he had promised to obtain government funds for associates with questionable backgrounds.

Um, no. Anything else I can help you with while I'm here?

Thursday, April 08, 2010

If you don't know what this relates to, ...



kids in the hall (Bar Fight)

BЯUCE | MySpace Video

... there's no point trying to explain it.

Document the dumbassitude.


Oh, man, I am going to dine off that one post for days. Just how much brown-nosing, suck up, wanky douchebagitude can you cram into a single comment:

What exactly is Ms. Guergis guilty of? Let’s review:
(details from the ANONYMOUS letter written by the airport worker, sent to Liberal MP Wayne Easter and to the media, available here: http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2010/02/helena-guergiss-adventures-in-prince-edward-island.html )
• She was late for her flight out of the Charlottetown airport.
• Either she or her aide informed the airline she was running late.
• The airline was informed the late passengers were “V.I.P.”
• If I read the letter correctly, Ms. Guergis and her aide arrived at the Air Canada counter at 17:20, five minutes before flight time (17:25).
You’d think that the airline employees, knowing the two were late, and knowing they were V.I.P., probably even knowing that it was a federal cabinet minister, would have expedited matters. Instead, they still insisted on the usual procedures, inconveniencing not only the two late arrivals but also the 30 other passengers who had already boarded. Did they expect to find a bomb on the two ladies?
• An altercation ensued, with the two ladies apparently being “difficult and rude”.
• At 17:25, scheduled flight time, the two ladies were in the pre-board area being screened.
The airport staff, instead of expediting the screening procedure, insisted on following regulations to the letter, probably to teach the lady a lesson.
• Ms. Guergis was asked to remove her boots. She did so, slamming them into the bin provided, NOT hurling or throwing them as was depicted in journalists’ reports.
• Ms. Guergis then said “Happy F****** to me! I guess i’m stuck in this hell hole!”
The press described her dropping the F-bomb as the minister having launched into an obscenity-laced tantrum. And everyone assumes the “hell hole” she referred to was the entire island of PEI, whereas she could have been referring to the airport, which most travelers nowadays might describe as she did.
• Once the incident became public knowledge, she did the right thing: she acknowledged her errors, she wrote an apology to the airport personnel, she stood up in the House and apologized there as well, and that should have been the end of it.

But the witch hunt continues.

I ask you -- is there anything in that screed that isn't hopeless bullshit?

Jesus Christ, the burning stupid.


What the f...?

Oh, fuck off, Sandy.


The attack of the whiny-ass titty babies.

Coke and hookers? Works for me!


Via "Politics - for the people," we learn that Rahim Jaffer is just a people person:

The story behind Ex-MP Rahim Jaffer's drunk-driving arrest
Jaffer boasted to businesses: I can get government money easily

The booze was flowing on the back patio at Harbour 60 Steakhouse in downtown Toronto.

Nazim Gillani of International Strategic Investments, four business associates, and three busty hookers dined in style last Sept. 10.

Former MP Rahim Jaffer, a self-described peddler of government grants, credits and loans, was in fine form, chatting up prospective clients. Early the next morning, Gillani would greet the day with a colourful email to the night’s guests: “Mr. Jaffer has opened up the Prime Minister’s office to us,” he boasted, unaware at the time of how Jaffer’s night had ended. Gillani is a character. By last September, at least two major police departments and the federal taxman were after him on fraud or tax evasion allegations.

Yeah, you should read the rest.

ANIMAL MAGNETISM! Yes, I am a Google magnet:



HAHAHAHAHAHA!! Choosing just that perfect accompanying photo is a talent. Like this.

Juxtapose!


Thank you, CBC:



P.S. Yeah, helping to train local Afghan police. Cuz that's been working out swell so far.

I have no words.




If you think you have the metaphorical nads to read the rest, you're on your own. I stopped because my spleen crawled out my ear and tried to strangle me.

Some people don't take rejection well.


That's why restraining orders were invented.


Wednesday, April 07, 2010

What can possibly go wrong -- part deux.


Republican Virginia governor Bob McDonnell declares April "Confederate History Month." Not to be outdone, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper announces "Aboriginal Residential Schools Week," while the Pope designates 2010 as the "Year of the Child."

Yes, they really DO think as slowly as you suspected.


Shorter Blogging Tory "Hunter": "Call me crazy, but I'm starting to have misgivings about this whole thing."

Tune in next week when Hunter unloads the bombshell that she doesn't think Saddam Hussein had WMDs after all.

Stephen Harper: Buyer's remorse writ large.


I wonder if someone's having awkward second thoughts:

Karzai's Taliban threat unacceptable: Harper

Prime Minister Stephen Harper slammed Hamid Karzai following reports the Afghan president has threatened to quit politics and join the Taliban.

"I have not seen the context of President Karzai's remarks but what I have seen reported is completely unacceptable," Harper told reporters in Mississauga, Ont., on Wednesday.

"We have men and women who are over there putting their lives on the line to help the population in its struggle against the Taliban. These remarks are not helpful and in the context of the dangerous work that our people are doing they are completely unacceptable to Canada and I'm sure the same is true for all of our allies."

Here's a hint, Stephen: Hamid Karzai doesn't give a fuck what you think because he owns you. You've been played. And, seriously, it looks good on you.

Idiot.

TALIBAN STEPHEN!



Let them eat brioche!


Some people are regular dicks. And some people are super dicks.

What could possibly go wrong?


Via Birth Pangs, file under "freedom of religious expression":

My religious beliefs include the beliefs that an individual is alive at the moment of conception, abortion is murder and is the worst murder of all murders possible because these babies are completely defenseless, and I am entitled under my religious beliefs to use deadly force if necessary to save the innocent life of another.

Somewhere, Canadian anti-choicer Suzanne Fortin is finally starting to feel uneasy about the raving whackjobs she's climbed into bed with.

No, no, just kidding -- she's good with that.

P.S. Personally, according to my religious beliefs, I am entitled to hoof Ezra Levant in the nads at every opportunity. Oppress my religious beliefs? I think not.

Violence for me, but not for thee.


Blogging Tory Raphaeldrian Alexandnair is terribly, terribly concerned about ideologically-inspired violence. Well, OK, he's terribly, terribly concerned about some ideologically-inspired violence. Not all of it.

Apparently, life is short, Adrian is a busy man and you have to pick your outrages carefully.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK: Really, is there any way you're going to top this?

It’s one thing to criticize Israel for their policies with regards to Gaza and Palestine. The use of phosphorous shelling, civilian casualties, and expansion of settlements are all worrisome.

Adrian opines that the indiscriminate use of illegal white phosphorus munitions against civilian populations is, in his words, "worrisome." That's quite the delightful bit of understatement there, wouldn't you say? Sort of like saying there's something about Catholic priests fucking altar boys that makes you uneasy but you can't quite put your finger on it.

P.S. In case you need to see what white phosphorus does to the human body, well, take a deep breath first. Yeah, I think we can all agree that that's "worrisome." Possibly even "disturbing," but I suspect Adrian would draw the line at "disturbing."

And by "rising star," I mean "unspeakable retard."


Now that the political career of anger management issue queen Helena Guergis is dropping like a lead turd, it is apparently necessary to cast around and find another female Con MP with the requisite lack of intellect, ethics, awareness and pretty much anything else, and announce to all and sundry that she is the NEXT BIG THING. And so, having pretty much picked the barrel clean, the Stephen Harper Party of Canada holds its nose, lifts up the barrel and presents us with ... Shelly Glover.

That would be this Shelly Glover:



That would be this Shelly Glover. And given that some people are already whispering (in all seriousness, apparently) that she has the aura and drawing power of Sarah Palin about her, it's worth perusing some of Glover's prose, as reproduced at Steve V's place:

I’ll tell you straightforward, Canadians are seeing an increase in crime.

"I'll tell you straightforward?" What the fuck kind of illiteracy and brutal assault on the English language is that? One certainly sees the similarity with the equally illiterate Palin in that little exchange.

But it's Glover's ugly habit of pulling numbers and facts out of thin air that will undoubtedly endear her to Canada's largest special ed class. One can hardly wait until Glover rises in Parliament to gift us with gems something like, oh, "Regarding the question raised by the Honourable Member, let me respond with some figures I just yanked out of my ass."

Oh, yes, there is going to be some serious entertainment value if this woman is handed the keys to a Cabinet position of any kind. The only debate is whether she would flame out as spectacularly as Helena Guergis or Lisa Raitt. Tough acts to follow, to be sure, but don't sell Glover short. That kind of burning stupid doesn't come along often, and we will all be richer for the experience. In a comedic sort of way.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Here, let me tighten that up for you.


Shorter Canadian wingnuts: "What's that? Someone sexually molested children and isn't being held accountable!? I'm outraged! How on Earth could that happen?"


No, thanks, we'll sit this one out.


Dear Israel:

Getting real tired of being your personal bodyguard.

Yours sincerely,
America

So, how's that whole Afghanistan thing working out for ya?


Oh, dear.

Don't worry, though -- Canada's Blogging Tories are all over this disturbing turn of events like Jabba the Roy on the buffet at Denny's:



Or not.

... and then I hit my daily word limit, gosh darn it.


Blogging Tory Raphian MacNalexander is outraged -- outraged, I tells ya -- over the very notion of the sexual abuse of children:

Pardon Of Graham James Is Offensive

This outrage should be something that all Canadians of all political persuasions can rally behind. Child abusers and child sex offenders are in a special risk category that are unlikely to ever be truly “rehabilitated”. No man who rapes a child once can ever really be considered safe from reoffending.

And ... juxtapose!



Sure, I'm picking on Adrian, but I could have pretty much similarly mocked any Blogging Tory at random. They're kind of predictable that way.

Promises, promises.


Blogging Tory Justin "Fuck You, Canada" Hoffer is fed up and he's not going to take it anymore:

I am no longer Canadian.

Yes, I still live in Canada, but I'm leaving as soon as I can. Why? Because of the parole of Graham James.

And when Justin Hoffer makes a promise, you can take that baby to the bank, yessir, you betcha. Like here.

Oh, wait ... there was a Plan B.

Oh, wait ...

And in closing, here's Justin:

All who disagree, I hope you die.

And in a spirit of progressive civility, Justin, we just hope you leave.

Stephen Taylor must be so proud.

PZ!


This ...



... is the PZ effect. Awesome, no?

Optimism!


Shorter "Bobo": "And there's gonna be rainbows and ponies and everything!"

Monday, April 05, 2010

Pay no attention to those ugly rumours.


Some people are just such gossips:

Critics riled as pontiff doesn't mention scandal at Sunday mass, while top cardinal denounces charges of sex abuse as ‘idle chatter'

After an Easter weekend in which the Vatican responded defiantly to a child sex-abuse scandal with silence from Pope Benedict XVI and bitter accusations from his senior clerics, the Roman Catholic Church finds itself embroiled in conflicts with two other major religions and calls for a wider apology.

The Pope’s Easter Sunday mass in St. Peter’s Square surprised many observers with his silence on allegations that he helped protect priests who had raped children in half a dozen countries . Even more surprising was an unprecedented introductory sermon yesterday by Angelo Sodano, the dean of the Vatican’s College of Cardinals, in which he denounced widespread charges of child sex abuse by priests as “idle chatter.”

Unsurprisingly, child rapists will always have their defenders. Oh, look ... there's one now:



I would have linked to child rape apologist Suzie All-Caps, except for her classless habit of redirecting incoming links to pages of abortion porn. She's kind of like that, you know. Classless.

So ... how's that Afghan police training thing working out?


Oh, dear.

Awwwwwwwwkward.


Whoops.

Molecules!


Honest to Christ, where do you even start?

OHMIGOD, LOOK AWAY, LOOK AWAY!



Beating inmates to death: It's a Blogging Tory thing.


Unsurprisingly, Blogging Tory Maria "Dodo Wants You to Fuck Off" Nunes is the most recent moist-panty fan of one Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

That would be this Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

You cannot possibly be surprised.

Victory! Boo-yah! High five!


Blogging Tory Jabba the Roy is all a-quiver with excitement:

Strong economic growth has already shrank the deficit federally. Very good news. The deficit for 2009-2010 is 20% smaller than forecast. It is still a massive $40 billion dollars, but it is a good sign that it is already shrinking.

Celebrating because the deficit is 20% smaller than was forecast is somewhat akin to praising the Catholic Church because they're fucking 20% fewer altar boys than they used to.

It's journalism's "Everybody Gets A Trophy" Day.


Apparently, any idiot can write for examiner.com. Many do.

Arrogance:


noun.


13th apostle? WHAT 13th apostle?


Oh ... that 13th apostle:


PZ!


I do loves me some PZ effect. That acrid smell is CC HQ's SiteMeter currently melting down.

BONUS TRACK: Even people in Austin are rolling their eyeballs.

Anything to get in front of a camera, eh, folks?


Jesus, anything for some publicity:

Families of fallen mourn at Kandahar

The families of nine Canadian soldiers killed in combat over the past four years made a solemn Easter weekend pilgrimage to Kandahar, ...

Fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters and uncles took part in a special ceremony Saturday behind the task force headquarters at Kandahar Airfield, where the faces, names and dates of the 141 dead soldiers are etched into a granite memorial...

Patty Braun, whose son Cpl. David Braun was died in August 2006, said she believes Canadian troops should stay in Afghanistan in some capacity until the tide has completely turned.

The trip to Kandahar was an important personal journey, she said.

"I had to come to the place where my son was last alive. And I needed to smell it. I needed to see. I needed to taste it. And I needed to hear it," said Braun, who wore the shemagh desert scarf that belonged to him and was returned with his personal effects.

Christ, talk about self-obsessed attention hogs. Whatever it takes to get some media coverage, is that it? I've never seen people enjoying the deaths of their loved ones so much.

(Pause.)

Oh, wait, that wasn't me, that was Ann Coulter:

Coulter lambastes 9/11 widows in new book
Sen. Clinton calls statements a ‘vicious, mean-spirited attack’

WASHINGTON - New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a “vicious, mean-spirited attack” on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows, whom the right-wing television pundit described as “self-obsessed” and enjoying their husbands’ deaths.

Coulter writes in a new book, “Godless: The Church of Liberalism,” that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act “as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them.”

She also wrote, “I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands’ deaths so much.”

Cue people who were just about to tee off on me for my monstrous, unconscionable cruelty and appalling lack of compassion suddenly going very, very quiet as they frantically search for reasons why it was OK when Ann Coulter did it.

Publishes worthless, illiterate pieces of crap by known dingbats? Check.


Someone brings to my attention a vacuous, online rag called "The Examiner." This is all I need to know. Apparently, giving the intellectually limited their own periodical builds self-esteem. Or something.

Sunday, April 04, 2010

Ah, the unintentional hilarity.


Blogging Tory "JoJo" presents us with the painfully obvious:

It’s tough to be a Catholic these days ...

And then we have the hilarity:

Yes, we must remember that we are all human beings – even those on a pedestal in Rome. And not all Catholic clergy are pedophiles.

Well, that's a relief, then.

BY THE WAY
, JoJo, here's a thought: When Christians yammer on ceaselessly about how their religious beliefs make them ethically, morally and spiritually superior to the rest of us, they don't simultaneously have the right to say, "Hey, we're only human" when they're caught fucking altar boys.

I'm just sayin'.

WTF? Here's commenter "Steph":

I think that Rev. Michael McGourty’s message is a very important one, not just for the Catholic church but for all denominations of Christianity and perhaps all religions. Whether it be corrupt televangelists or suicide bombers, certain members of a particular religion can give people a bad impression of the whole religion. Some are just using the label of the religion as a front but others are trying hard and failing. It’s important to remember that people are indeed human and do make mistakes, sometimes horrible ones, and that’s exactly why we needed Someone who was perfect to do what we couldn’t do on our own and pave the way to God for us.

So ... if I read her correctly, Steph is suggesting that it's a good thing for some Christians to be amoral, child-molesting monsters since that just emphasizes the sweet, sweet perfection of Jesus. And it helps win converts, too.

Is anyone else starting to get just plain creeped out by these apologists?

Remind me again why Canadians are dying over there.


Oh, right ... it's because Hamid Karzai hates us. Sure, I'm good with that.

Here, let me tighten that up for you.


Shorter Easter Sunday Blogging Tories: "As screeching intolerant bigots who, 364 days a year, despise and denigrate liberals, leftards, scientists, atheists, feminists, black people, aboriginals, Muslims and immigrants, we'd like to celebrate the Prince of Peace and tell you all that God is love. Christ is risen."

Then again ...


Having only recently cautioned us against the uncritical and unquestioning acceptance of idiotic and absurd religious beliefs involving invisible sky monsters, Blogging Tory Maria "I have no clue what I wrote yesterday" Nunes takes a minute this Easter Sunday to celebrate idiotic and absurd religious beliefs involving invisible sky monsters.

As the saying goes, you can't make this stuff up.

Somehow, the irony pleases me.


Perusing the day care and special ed class that is Stephen Taylor's Blogging Tories and ... what's this?



Oh, yes, that looks potentially mockworthy, let's check it out ... well, crap:



Although that seems strangely appropriate, does it not?

Thanks, but I've found someone new.


So ... what do you call the Governor-General after the Trophy Governor-General?

Then again, on the other hand ...


Canada's wankers would like to tell you how totally, totally pissed they are with other people and countries and organizations telling Canada what to do and how to do it. We're Canadians, and we'll run our country the way we damned well please, without any advice from outsiders, thank you very much, so all those foreigners can just put a fucking sock in it because we can look after our own affairs.

On an urelated note, Stephen Harper would have loved to bring Abousfian Abdelrazik home, but he'd been put on a U.N. no-fly list by the United States so, like, whaddya gonna do?

Saturday, April 03, 2010

Oh, for fuck's sake, ...


... here we go again:

Fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters and uncles took part in a special ceremony Saturday behind the task force headquarters at Kandahar Airfield, where the faces, names and dates of the 141 dead soldiers are etched into a granite memorial.

Myles Kennedy, who lost his son to a roadside bombing on Easter Sunday 2007, said he was amazed at the scale of NATO's buildup for this spring's planned offensive in Kandahar...

He appealed to Prime Minister Stephen Harper to conduct a "phased withdrawal" by perhaps signing on to a proposed training mission in Kabul.

A total pullout of troops would send "the wrong message to the world" and to the soldiers, such as his son, who made enormous sacrifices.

"I don't want him to die in vain," Kennedy said. "It could be a year. It could be two years of turning this country around. Let's give it time. Let's not walk away from the table when you're holding a winning hand."

"We came in to do a job. And our job will not be complete, if he pulls out the whole group."

Then here's a thought, Mr. Kennedy -- shut up and enlist. Otherwise, knock it off with that "we" crap.

WHAT A SHAME, leaving when victory is so close at hand. Oh, wait ...


Canada's Religious Right would like to warn you against the evils of religion.


Oh, Lord ... here's Maria "Dodo Fucking Hates You All" Nunes, cautioning us against a surplus of religious whackjobbery:



Yes, the people for whom deep and abiding religious belief is the answer to everything ... want you to know that those homicidal, Christian lunatics have nothing to do with them. After all, they're not true Christians.

Or maybe they're not real Scotsmen. I always get those two confused.

ANTICHRIST? WHAT ANTICHRIST?
Oh ... that antiChrist.

Macleans' Mitchel Raphael: So close and still fucking it up.


An initially useful piece by Mr. Raphael:

What were the organizers of the Ann Coulter event thinking?

The cancellation of controversial conservative commentator Ann Coulter’s Ottawa talk seemed to Capital Diary to be due less to protesters and more to incompetent organizers. Those in charge of the event kept allowing people into the foyer of the lecture hall until occupants were in danger of being crushed. The two sets of doors that opened into that foyer became difficult to open with all the bodies pushing through, creating a serious safety hazard. (At one point the fire alarm was pulled.) Ottawa police officers, who are certainly used to dealing with large crowds, seasoned protesters and dignitaries (like Barack Obama) rolling through town, were on hand but decided to allow the crowd to grow as more and more people from the long line outside pushed in. Ten minutes before the event was to start, two organizers started to slowly check off names from an email list and let people in. It soon became obvious many of the hundreds of people in line who had been waiting for hours would not get in, yet organizers chose not to inform them, fuelling anger in the crowd. “Will we even get in?” people started shouting. Fifteen to 20 minutes after the first people had been let in, entry to the hall was stopped (even though lots of VIPs continued to get in through side doors).

And then the unforgivable fuck-up:

Around 8 p.m., with the hall about half full, the event was cancelled.

No, Mr. Raphael, the event was not simply cancelled -- it was cancelled by its own organizers. How hard would it have been to have added those last four words?

Jesus, what a useless tool.

A day early but what the hell ...


God loves you. Well, OK, not really.


Ah, I have so missed the Denyseitude.


Here's Canada's pre-eminent IDiot, Denyse O'Leary, with another novel argument against "Darwinism":

... [a writer's] editor had demanded that I account for the fact that humans share 98% of our DNA with chimps.

I asked her a simple - and, to me, obvious - question: Let's kidnap a guy off the subway in Toronto. Yes, that is a felony offence, but maybe we can manage the whole thing discreetly and get the charges dropped, if he agrees that it was all a private matter anyway ...

(would help if he was a friend or relative - of course, we could, at worst, be charged with wasting police time ...)

But now! We've got him! We will put a chimp from the local zoo of similar age beside him (securely buckled in, because we would not want anything bad to happen to our man).

If both are more than 30 years old, and are normal specimens, how many people will believe that they are 98% identical?

What woman, otherwise consigned to being a spinster, would marry the chimp if she didn't get the man? After all, the chimp is supposedly 98% of a man.

So Denyse's argument is that, even with that remarkable genetic similarity, Darwinism is clearly false since people still refuse to date outside of their species? Really? As a hard-core conservative, Denyse, are you sure that's the argument you want to be making?

I'm just asking.

Sure, that analogy works.


Why, of course, it's just like the Holocaust:

Pope's preacher compares abuse fury to anti-Semitism

Pope Benedict XVI's personal preacher on Friday compared the fury aimed at the Catholic leadership because of sexual abuse within the Church to aspects of anti-Semitism...

He then quoted what he said was a letter from a Jewish friend. "I am following with disgust the violent and concentric attack against the church, the pope and all the faithful from the whole world," the letter said.

"The use of the stereotype, the passage from the responsibility and personal wrong to that of the whole reminds us of the most shameful aspects of anti-Semitism."

Sure ... the insane, genocidal slaughter of millions of Jews, and the serious annoyance at Catholic priests for fucking altar boys. I can definitely see the similarities.

I feel so ashamed.

Friday, April 02, 2010

How ... odd.


Curious:

This started with 16 professors who have protested an initiative in which some 70 universities across Canada have agreed to sponsor children of Canadian soldiers killed in action in Afghanistan by covering their tuition at no cost. These 16 profs have stated in no uncertain terms that the Canadian military is involved in an "imperialist" action, are invaders, and therefore it would be improper for universities to support the soldiers.

Adler, great Canadian patriot that he is, ain't having any of that shite!

Scares the hell out of me that unbelievably ignorant and naive asses like these, and the one that confronted Adler on his broadcast, actually get to teach our kids.

God help us.

So, if I read this correctly, the same people who have, for years, been screeching and howling about how some people shouldn't have "special rights" are now screeching and howling that some people should have, well, special rights.

Did I get that about right?

Good Friday quote of the day.


No, Barack Obama isn't a brown-skinned, wishy-washy, bleeding heart liberal socialist, giving away free medical care to the poor and needy. You're thinking of Jesus.

Have a happy Easter.


This one's for that useless, sanctimonious hypocrite Suzie All-Caps:



(Wag of the tail to commenter "chris".)

Thursday, April 01, 2010

And here's where we juxtapose ...


Here's Blogging Tory "JoJo," telling Hillary Clinton in no uncertain terms that she can mind her own fucking business, thank you very much:

“It is Canada and Canadians who will make Canadian decisions.”

... Prime Minister Harper stated in the House of Commons that “Whether it comes to our role in Afghanistan, our sovereignty over our Arctic or ultimately our foreign-aid priorities, it is Canada and Canadians who will make Canadian decisions.”

And here's "JoJo" less than two weeks ago, sticking her nose where it doesn't belong:

And why do I care [about U.S. health care reform]? Because the health of their economic recovery impacts ours.

Degree of difficulty: None whatsoever.

Sarah Palin: Thief.


So, Sarah ... how's that TV special working out for ya? Whoopsie ... not so well, I see.


Teabonics!


Morans.

BONUS CANADIAN TEABONICS!




Actually, with Jabba the Roy, that's kind of unsettling imagery, isn't it?

AND THERE'S MORE ...




Now where were we? Oh, right ... decrying the incivility of the Left. Carry on, then.

Welcome to "Let's all mock religion" weekend.


Given that this is Easter weekend, I believe we should all exercise our Blogging Tory-guaranteed right to free speech to savagely and wickedly ridicule religion for the next four days. Cuz that's just the kind of guy I am. So even though I posted this clip recently, once again, here's Christine Kane with "Mary Katherine's Ash Wednesday Journal Entry." Enjoy.



Your turn.

The lack of awareness is hysterical.


Over at her blog "Climbing Out of the Septic Tank," Blogging Tory Brenda/"Hunter" gets all political and boycotty:



This would be Brenda ... boycotting Google ... at her blog ... a "Blogger" blog ... owned by Google.

Jesus, but that broad is retarded.

More kittehs!


Very soon, there will be a passel of new kittehs available here in K-W. A neighbour had two females that, in a spectacular display of timing, managed to get pregnant two weeks apart and, just last night, I personally saw all 10 kittehs in their large cardboard box.

What's weird is that the two mothers get along and actually share joint custody of the whole brood -- whoever's in the mood will allow any of the kittehs to feed while the other takes a break. Weird.

In any event, shortly after I saw the pack, said neighbour whisked the whole bunch off to the K-W Humane Society. The older ones are only three weeks old so it will be a couple weeks at least before adoption is a possibility but if you have the time and want to pop over there, I'm pretty sure they'll be easy to locate.

"But ... but ... but ... the Liberulz!!!"


Blogging Tory (and Ann Coulter wannabe) "Rightchik" knows whose fault this is:

Mr. Harper - will you now please act like a PM with an MA in Economics?

I knew this. You knew this. And Prime Minister Harper sure as hell knew this. You do not spend your way out of a recession by creating a ungodly large deficit. And now the venerable Financial Post confirms what we all knew all along.

Fuckin' A! So whose asinine, idiotic idea was that, anyway? Oh ...

But Mr. Harper caved to the opposition who threatened to topple this Conservative government. Political survival, I get that. I even empathize with what he did, I just wish he didn't cave, I mean compromise, to such a huge extent!

So, if memory serves, the people who have -- for month after month after month -- mocked Michael Ignatieff for being a weak, feeble, vacuous, powerless yob with no influence whatsoever and who can't even control the members of his own party ... are simultaneously accusing Michael Ignatieff of being a ruthless, scheming, manipulative, unprincipled monster who's bent Stephen Harper over a table and had his way with him, economically speaking.

Is that what I'm reading? Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's what I'm reading.

P.S. Uh, Rightchik? That whole boots thing? LuLu was down with that first. I'm just sayin'.