In which our hero, Dr. Dawg, armed only with clear thinking, cogent arguments and the lance of mere reason, wanders into the circle jerk that is Steve's comments section and asks:
I won't defend [Deb] Frisch--she's clearly unhinged--but Robert has a point: why no outrage from you and others when Ann Coulter and others urge the US to commit genocide? At least Frisch has the excuse of being unbalanced in the clinical sense. What about Coulter?
to which commenter "Mac," in a seriously kick-ass display of what passes for right-wing snark that must just have them howling down at Dino's Beer and Peeler Bar, retorts:
Dr. Dawg, it appear [sic] you're hellbent on changing the subject. I wonder why that would be, hmmm?
which proves beyond any doubt that the good Dr. Dawg simply doesn't understand the rules of ideological discourse here, which are that, if Lefties suggest that the current CPC government appears to have some corruption problems, the proper response from the Right is to, of course, lash back savagely, howling on incessantly about the Liberals and the sponsorship scandal while, if anyone on the Left attempts to make an ideological comparison of that nature, they are naturally just being weaselly and evasive and changing the subject.
But that's just because those two situations are totally different. Totally.
No comments:
Post a Comment