And for your reading amusement, the latest installment in the ongoing Brian Lemon meltdown, where he so desperately wants to close the book on this hideous embarrassment to his now non-existent credibility:
... Short of an admission by the reporter, or complete video evidence of his entire attendance at the event, no conclusion one way or the other can be made.
Similarly, I can't prove that Brian Lemon has carnal relations with 12-year-old male Thai street hookers and barnyard animals but, then again, he can't prove he doesn't. Stalemate, I guess. Better reserve judgment on that one.
Reporters shouldn't ever be in a position to "Be the news". And this is yesterday's.
Um ... Brian ... the only reason Michael Ware was "the news" was that you and the rest of your right-wing, craptacular journalist wannabe hack colleagues made up shit about him and made him the news. Do you see how that works?
In short -- Brian's position is: no retraction, no correction, no apology and let's all please forget that this ever happened. I mean, it's all so ... so ... 24 hours ago, know what I mean?
In unrelated news, Brian desperately wants to talk about what happened "in the later Chretien years."
That's a good little right-wing stenographer, Brian. Here. Have a biscuit.
4 comments:
They're merely an echo chamber, constantly on the hunt for the next two minute hate. Wether or not they're speaking the truth is irrelevant to them.
Actually, I just found out who Drudge's source on Ware's heckling was.
...
...
Turns out it was Bagdhad police captain Jamail Hussein.
...
These imbeciles still believe Saddam had WMDs. Keep the spotlight on their lies. It's important.
I wrote a response on his website('cause well, he did ask for it...). I wonder how long it'll stay up?
Poor Brian, he so desperately wants to be a northern version of LGF, but fails miserably at it. I’d forgotten about his “vomitous” post that he promised to take down if he was proven wrong, which he was. It’s still there. No apology, no correction, no removal.
Post a Comment