I don't have anything offhand, but I don't really care if you believe it or not.
That ain't the fetus fetishist movement. That's the new Conservatives Truth, based on two pillars.a) Truth and accuracy mean nothing: if it's useful, I'll assert it. b) We're not talking to YOU. We're just cheerleading for US.
Careful. At that rate she could be a Canadian Sarah Palin.wv= "dencesse," as God is my witness.
And a few comments later:Since you are never accountable for the facts that you present in your opinions, then neither am I.It's all just a game, apparently.
As I always say, people who conflate paedophilia with sexual activity between adults don't understand what consent means and therefore, should not be allowed within a 100 metres of children...or house pets, or plants, or canister vacuums, or riding mowers...
The view of the Catholic Church with regard to the tendency of some of its priests towards paedophilia seems to be that - giving in to the "temptation presented by children" is a problem only because secular society does not share its view that the desire to engage in paedophilia is a natural sexual orientation - at the same time that is does not share its view that homosexuality is deviant.Omigawd - "cibasm"
I believe SUZANNE (she must be important and wise since her name is all capitals) would have been more correct if she'd limited it to "I really don't care."
I don't believe anybody who says s/he cares about the unborn.
Post a Comment