Monday, May 25, 2009

The Catholic Problem 2

In the about bloody time dept., Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has spoken out against the Catholic orders in Ireland responsible for operating workhouses where children were serially abused.

The comments from Martin, a veteran Vatican diplomat, were the harshest yet by a Roman Catholic leader following last week's report detailing widespread abuse in scores of church-run industrial schools from the 1930s to 1990s.


If the Catholic church is to survive into the 21st century with any sort of credibility, it will need to clean up its dirty act and stop enabling and protecting predators. Archbishop Martin's stance is a welcome break from the filthy lie of the
few bad apples defense and the subsequent cover ups and intimidation that have been tacit policy. Even in the wake of a nine year study and 2,600 page report, the church is denying culpability, hiding their pet felons and shifting the burden for reparations and compensation to the civil government. The lucky taxpayers get to pay for the crimes of the deviant clergy.

Martin said the nuns and Catholic brothers who ran the workhouses must drop their refusal to renegotiate an intensely criticized 2002 agreement with the Irish government over compensation for victims. The orders offered to pay only euro128 million (US$175 million) to the government to be protected from victims' civil lawsuits, while taxpayers are picking up a much larger bill to compensate over 14,000 victims of physical, sexual and mental abuse.


These supposed persons of faith fought tooth and nail to minimize exposure. They wrangled a deal to limit their share of compensation to a fraction of the total, shifting the greater burden to the taxpayers and still manage to conceal the identities of the child abusers and rapists in their midst. None of the perpetrators will see the insides of a cell and none of their victims will see justice done. Somehow within the church and its many orders it is better to protect those who commit physical, sexual and emotional violence against children than it is to protect children or accept responsibility for sins against them. So much for the cleansing and redemptive power of confession and contrition. The hypocrisy is almost enough to make one gag. Thanks goodness that there is at least one leader like Archbishop Martin speaking out from within, an unenviable task to be sure.

"In many ways, it is your last chance to render honor to charismatic founders and to so many good members of your congregations who feel tarnished," he said.
The Conference of Religious in Ireland, the umbrella body for the church's semiautonomous orders of Catholic brothers and nuns, declined to respond to Martin's comments. Last week it said none of its members intended to make any additional financial contributions -- provoking a furious response from victims and some politicians, but not from the government.


No comment, no responsibility, no help for the victims... and folks wonder why the church is increasingly viewed with contempt.  Sadly, the story does not end here because this is not a story of bad apples and isolated instances. There exists within the church a culture of deviance that allows for these crimes to take place on a widespread basis over generations and around the world. The bitter stories of child abuse in the Irish church are far from over.

Martin last month warned Dublin's Catholic faithful they will be shocked and outraged when the next investigation into clerical sex abuse -- in Martin's own archdiocese -- is published this summer.
That Justice Department-commissioned probe seeks to detail how hundreds of priests molested and raped children in Dublin from the 1940s onward while church and state agencies failed to report, punish and stop the abuse.


Hundreds of priests, thousands of victims and yet another in the long, disgusting list of church crimes against children. The complicity of government in quieting and covering up these crimes is no less disturbing and speaks to the power and influence that the church has within the secular arena. If I had a prayer in my heart it would be for Archbishop Martin in his battle on behalf of the innocents and victims of corruption in the Catholic church. It is heartening to see at least one church official with the courage and moral fortitude to speak and work against the culture of perversion that nests within the church, protected from exposure and justice.

emphasis added

6 comments:

Mike said...

Another "Bravo Sir"!

I think it and somehow, you type it...keep it coming.

Niles said...

Google 'Magdalen Laundry' for how the Church magnanimously dealt with girls as part of *normal* attempts to discipline the uppity gender. They were more unofficially known as Magdalen Hells.

deBeauxOs said...

Excellent blogpost.

I'd wager Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is not exactly popular among his lofty peers in the Catholic Church.

Unless other members of the clergy also speak out as vociferously against the physical, sexual, emotional and spiritual abuse of children (as they do against condom use), one may rightly judge them to be colluding with the predators and the abusers.

Dharma Satya said...

I read a piece today on the conditions in the Irish workhouses where children were making rosaries.

http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=227

Also: PZ, in his take on this, linked to another blog post of his where he tears Bill Donohue a new one for his chicken-shit attempts to negate the harm done by claiming that it was "only a few who were raped" and that "everyone abused kids in those days"... worth a read if you need to build up a good outrage.

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/05/the_catholic_league_downplays.php

Luna said...

A priest in SK I knew and respected was investigating allegations of abuse. He ended up in rehab for substance abuse. Trying to numb the memories. (And to think, he's only hearing it. Someone else had to *experience* it) He has since died. I don't know from what, but I'd guess the heavy drinking had a part.

I cannot even fathom the amount of courage it must have taken for that archbishop to stand up and speak out.

wv: dulatio

Christopher said...

Isn't it wonderful that the pope, during Vatican II, simply dismissed from the docket the issue of priestly celibacy? Yes, 'cause now all those forced abstainers can exercise their urges on the weak, the needy, and the unaware. And just as in Vatican II, the crimes resulting from dismissing forced celibacy can be forcibly dismissed, as well.

psa: You're absolutely right that the Catholic arm of Christianity has come out recently as a major embarassment. I certainly hope that at some point soon some more rogue clergy will speak out against the holocaust of deviance happening in their midsts. Martin, if left standing on his own, will most likely be silenced somehow. If more people in his position stand up, perhaps the guy with the pointy hat will actually do something about it. Mind you, he doesn't really have an illustrious history with this sort of thing either, does he? I seem to remember something about him attaching his signature to a document detailing the removal of some deviant priests to South America... You know, rather than deal with them by, say, placing them in prison for a good long while, just send them somewhere where there isn't enough media clout to expose them for who they are.

This sort of stuff really pisses me off.