Via TBogg, we learn of one Charlotte Allen, who challenges us atheists to an intellectual give-and-take and animated discussion of the finer points of theology, as long as we can stop being such snivelling, whining jerks and self-obsessed, boring martyrs and assholes. Then maybe we can get somewhere.
In related Canadian news, Blogging Tory "Neo Conservative" invites you to leave a comment, you stupid, ugly, pathetic, ignorant, screeching, CC-loving moonbat leftard cocksucker. Or are you just chicken?
P.S. I would love to debate the finer points of God-existsness. Consider, if you will, the more intricate details of metaphysical epistemology contained herein:
If you were to "prove" that my mother did not exist, I would still know you were wrong, because I know my mother. The logic would in fact be flawed. In the same way, Christians know that God exists, through the witness of his Spirit whom he has given to us. God is not a theory or an idea or a wish. Therefore, I can say with certainty that any logical proof of God's non-existence would be flawed.
An interesting proposal which could be worded somewhat more succinctly:
I'd like to prove that I'm right. As a start, let us assume that I'm right. The rest follows naturally.
That does save everyone loads of time, doesn't it?