There's an even deeper and more delicious irony at work.
Consider the JCCF's panicked claim that this was "a unilateral decision made by one person in the organization".
So within this advocacy group for more transparency, more accountability, and better adherence to the spirit of law, a guy, without consulting anyone at all, can conceive an unethical, distasteful and probably illegal plan to stalk and spy on judges and senior officials he may want to embarrass; can select a contractor, enter into a contract, sign cheques and authorize expenses for the project, without ANYONE'S knowledge or approval?
Apart from the sleaziness of the entire operation - what an extraordinarily lax and sloppy governance, administrative and finance management framework these guardians of our freedom operate under.
Yup.
No comments:
Post a Comment