Wednesday, September 03, 2008

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!


Jabba the Roy spreads the cheeks you never kiss with and squeezes out another prizewinner:

Michell Malkin on leftist misogyny

Many of my female conservative blogger friends have commented on the sexist abuse they experience at the hands of lefties. They have even wondered about making hrc complaints against the more egregous offenders like cc, but they object to hrc censorship, so they haven't. Michelle Malkin faces this too.

Some advice, Doc ... you are not a lawyer, and you shouldn't even dream of playing one on TV.

Oh, and Doc? People don't despise Malkin because she's female. They despise her because she's a vile, disgusting human being, just like a number of those "female conservative blogger friends" of yours I choose to pick on. There is a difference.

13 comments:

The Seer said...

The first couple of days, I thought Sarah was a scream. I was all giggles, just like you. Now, I am starting to get scared. One of the things that made Dear Leader easier to bear is that he is lazy and doesn't much care about anything except oil and Iraq. This Sarah woman is hyper and in Alaska got her nose into everything. This woman, if she becomes president, could make George W. Bush look good.

Red Tory said...

Americans wanted "change"... I guess dumber and crazier falls into that category, doesn't it?

agsharma said...

So attacking conservative women = "Bad".

But attacking children who made the mistake of being democrats' spokespeople = "Fair Game"

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/10/malkin-debases-herself-with-further-attacks-on-a-12-year-old-cl-exclusive-quote/

Dr.Dawg said...

Leftdog reminds me of all the lovely things the Cons said about Belinda Stronach.

"Hypocritical" is too mild a word for these deranged individuals.

Sheena said...

I'm still trying to figure out the part about "cheeks you don't kiss with". I confess to being stumped on that one.

Ti-Guy said...

Well, if one is going to be picky, I suppose "cheeks that don't form part of the kissing ritual" would have been more accurate, but even then...

It's funny how it was always sexist with Stronach. First, she was celebrated for her feminine pulchritude (I seem to remember Conservative t-shirts with "Better than Viagra" printed on them in support of her candidacy for CPC leadership) and then defamed as a slut when she fell out of favour.

How do these hypocrites live with themselves?

liberal supporter said...

ti-guy, I think you missed it. I think sheena wanted you to say "I have four kisses for you. One for each cheek!"

Realistically, aside from relatives, if you were interested in kissing one set of cheeks you would probably not be against kissing the other.

Lore_Weaver said...

"and then defamed as a slut when she fell out of favour."

Ya, 'cause Maurice Vellacott and co. supported Belinda from the get go...

oh wait, they didn't. In fact, they never liked her. I think I distinctly remember her being despised by grassroots people in these areas while she was running for CPC leadership.

Look up Garth Turner on this one Ti-Guy.

Look at Garth for the Belinda crossing. Then look at Garth for the Emerson crossing. Then look at Garth for his own crossing.

This all had more to do with Belinda's positions on the issues than with her chromosomes.

KEvron said...

"This all had more to do with Belinda's positions on the issues than with her chromosomes."

but never so when it comes to us lefties....

KEvron

Ti-Guy said...

Lore: I'm not interested in whatever political differences people had with Belinda Stronach...I'm not interested in anything substantive the Conservatives have to say. I'm remarking now as I remarked then that the Conservatives should be the last people to cry "sexism" since their world view is dominated by it.

Peter Dodson said...

All we need to look at is the right's treatment of Hillary Clinton, from saying that she was a man, a lesbian, or just a bitch.

The difference is that the left seems to be focused on her qualifications, not making comments about her as a person.

mikmik said...

Let me remark on your specific pathology. The most deeply obvious is your projection of all your sick intonations onto the ghostly 'left wing' conspiricists that are not individuals, but for you, a simplified stereotypical monster group.

Your paranoia of all well reasoned logic, exemplified by your blanket labeling, shows extreme delusion unable to consider other opinion as but a threat to your fragile and very immature ego.

mikmik said...

This was the comment I left at dr boy