Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Does everyone have their new talking points?

Shorter Big Daddy and his merry band of in-and-out fuckwits: Fine -- we admit it. We used national ads for local candidates and completely overspent the defined campaign spending cap. But it was legal because we say it was. So there.

[CC here]: "Your Honour, my client is innocent of the charge of murder, he wasn't even there! But if he was there, he didn't do it. And if he did it, it was an accident. Besides, that son-of-a-bitch had it coming to him!"

Isn't it sad when life imitates art?


CC said...

Let me emphasize the most important sentence from that article:

"For the first time, the party admits in its final Federal Court filing that the ads, which it placed through "regional media buys," were designed for the national campaign."

For the first time.

For the first time.

For the first time.

Yes, after denying, denying, denying all this time, the criminals in the CPoC have finally come clean.

For the first time.

I can't wait to see how Stephen Taylor's Blogging Airheads spin this one. It's popcorn time.

The Seer said...

Can somebody explain to me why you cannot have a coalition between the Liberals and the NDP? Cuz the alternative seems to be, as they say in the US, "four more years . . . .