So, after having destroyed his life savings, credit rating, career and relations with his immediate family members by having defamed me maliciously back in 2010, Lloydminster's Patrick Ross seems to think that the wisest course of action is to ... publicly suggest I have carnal relations with barnyard animals.
I'm guessing that Patrick has no clue that all of this is admissible in a court of law as clear intent that he plans on continuing to defame me even as he owes me way over $100,000. I'll have more to say about this in the December 19 Happy Interestversary post, but rest assured that I have screenshots of all of Patrick's ongoing defamation, every bit of which is relevant in any further legal proceedings when he tries to throw himself on the mercy of the court and pretend remorse, and I can prove he doesn't mean a word of it.
Stay tuned.
10 comments:
I remember you mentioned this before, but the most embarrassing parts of Patrick's tweets is that he adds numerous "laugh until you cry" emojis to his own tweets, as if so much of what he says is hilariously funny, when it's not funny at all. How childish are you if you add laughing emojis to everything you tweet? If you have to tell people what you're typing is funny, it probably isn't.
Anon @ 6:56 AM: You forgot about Patrick's creepy obsession with tagging so much of his irrelevant garbage with things like "#abpoli" or "#cdnpoli", as if this has anything to do with politics, but it's his desperate attempt to remain relevant when most of his stuff rarely gets more than a few dozen views.
Patrick Ross is so pathetic and dumb, that if you prosposed him - and his humiliating life story - as a character in a movie, the character would be rejected as completely unrealistic.
I notice this a lot with trolls and the right-wing online. It’s all part of their gaslighting and unfortunately it is far more effective than people realize. It allows these toxic trolls to bully and harass “others”, revel in their own ignorance, while then later playing the victim because they were “just jokes!!!” Then they claim they are being cancelled or censored for making jokes. Just another way the right has discovered they can be completely abhorrent pseudo-fascist abusers while trying to avoid even the slightest speck of personal responsibility or accountability for their own actions and behaviors. As always.
Adding bricks for the defense of "nobody would believe me, I am so not credible"
Problem is, he will pretend he thought you were in Texas or Wyoming, and so he is not accusing you of something that is illegal pretty much everywhere like before, just accusing you of being weird.
Every time your think lil Ross has hit bottom, he manages to dig a little more.
Patrick clearly still thinks that if the original case had gone to trial, he would have won. He conveniently omits that he failed entirely to defend himself before the courts in the first place ...
MgS: It would not have made any difference if Patrick had filed a defense -- the judge's endorsement contained the sentence, "The defendants' conduct detailed in the Statement of Claim and in this motion was clearly malicious." That sentence alone disqualified most of Patrick's possible defenses; there is nothing Patrick could have presented to get around that.
Proving malice is generally difficult, but I had evidence by the truckload, including public bragging by Patrick that he was defaming me specifically to ruin both my personal and professional reputation. Once a judge sees that, it's over.
No question about that - I was referring to his own internal belief that had it gone to trial, he would have "won" ... the same way he "wins" arguments on Twitter.
Post a Comment