If you want to understand the depth of Patrick Ross's dishonesty, I'll give you an example from a single paragraph out of his tedious Affidavit -- the rest of that document is equally bullshit.
Here's paragraph 25, where Patrick hyperventilates hysterically over ... well, fiction:
so let's deconstruct that nonsense a few words at a time.
"Mr. Day had either ordered or asked" ... Well, which is it? Asked or ordered? I'm pretty sure I don't have the inherent authority to order anyone around from hundreds of kilometers away, so that phrase is a bit over the top.
"physical surveillance of my private residence" ... but that isn't Patrick's private residence, it belonged to his parents and Patrick has been off working in northern Alberta for quite some time now, so describing it as his "private residence" is a bit of a stretch.
"These individuals wore masks and removed the license plates from their vehicles to evade identification." ... This is the most hysterically misleading sentence of the bunch and we'll have to disembowel it a couple words at a time.
"These individuals wore masks" ... I am aware of one accommodating volunteer who swung by Casa Ross while wearing a scarf around his face; that makes it one individual who wore one face covering. Note well how Patrick's exaggeration has morphed this into multiple individuals wearing multiple masks.
"and removed the license plates ... to evade identification" ... Uh, no. In fact, the single individual in question explained that he had just purchased the vehicle and that the temporary paper tag was properly taped in the truck's rear window while he awaited his permanent plate. Predictably, Patrick was too stupid to figure that out and, ever since then, the story is of a nefarious, sinister stalker who (weirdly) removed his own license plate (which is a truly stupid thing to do since it just begs to get pulled over).
This is the level of slimy misrepresentation that absolutely permeates Patrick's entire Affidavit. And Patrick's lawyer was too stupid, too lazy or too incompetent to recognize the warning signs of total bullshit and signed his name to all of this.
BONUS TRACK: I will just let you slowly and lovingly savour the rancid bullshit of this pathetic and dishonest weeping and moaning:
That's what happens when you challenge someone to "bring it the fuck on."
You asked about Exhibit D? You are going to be disappointed, as here is the email Patrick received and entered in his Affidavit as Exhibit "D", which is nothing more than an acknowledgment that he had made the request:
That is less than exciting.
7 comments:
CC: Please post this Exhibit D where he details you sending stalkers to photograph him, etc. Wondering if he outright accuses and names anyone in such?
I'll be the one to point out that just because Patrick filed an Access to Information and Privacy request doesn't mean that A) the requested police report actually exists (yes, CC isn't the only cynic), or B) that it verifies his claims.
Also, Exhibit D shows that the request was sent a mere three working days ago, less than a week before the court date. That right there tells you how seriously Patrick is taking this whole thing. Why didn't he ask for a copy as soon as the police finished their investigation? Didn't he think it would be useful to have on hand? The obvious answer is that he never took his claims of harassment seriously in the first place. Or was he too traumatized to fill out a web form?
Augray: I did not even notice the date on that. Nice catch.
CC: I may not be that quick on the uptake. I've now noticed that there's a police file number in the subject line, which (IMNSHO) only slightly increases the probability that the report actually exists. But perhaps you could file an Access to Information and Privacy request as well? Just so you don't have to take Patrick's word for what's on it. ;)
This whole thing is a nothing burger. I have heard of lawyers in the Prairies essentially telling people “this won’t work, but if you insist I will take your money and do x things for you with your specific legal intent in mind”
Translation: “You’re an idiot but you won’t shut up, so I’ll take your money. Don’t whine when you lose, because I told you in the beginning you had no chance.”
The greed of lawyers these days blows my mind.
Augray: I don't care enough to dig into this any further. Based on what I know, all this represents is someone reporting, "Hey, there was someone walking down our street looking at a house." Big fucking deal.
I know you will be busy tomorrow but if you get a chance to give us a "we're up" on Bluesky it would be appreciated.
Post a Comment