Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(806)
-
▼
February
(99)
- Look, Becky! BILLIONS and BILLIONS of condoms!
- Blogging Tories Short Takes, February 28, 2010.
- Helena Guergis: So not ready for prime time.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Suddenly, that "No Fly List" has real entertainmen...
- Being an unethical douchebag for all the right rea...
- New PMO Aide Hired
- Our Next Prime Minister!
- Bitch.
- And here's where we juxtapose ...
- It's nice to see the Christians still getting your...
- This is why I have a cat door.
- Dear Canadian military: You're dying for what again?
- Being assholes without suffering the consequences.
- Do As We Say, Not As We Do
- The joy of anti-choice idolatry.
- Bjorn Lomborg: Douchebag!
- When really stupid conservatives write stupidly.
- Whoopsie.
- Uh oh ... that NATO coalition honeymoon seems to b...
- Blogging Tory "Hunter": Canada's Whiniest Wanker?
- Because Hunter's a lunatic, that's why.
- Yeah, yeah, whenever ...
- Go Uvex!
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Nancy Greene Raine: A whore by any other name ...
- Own the podium!
- Jihad! Oh, wait ...
- It's only democracy when other people fuck with it.
- Yeah, yeah, still here.
- What the Winter Olympics means to me.
- How pissed off should we be about this?
- Take our pavilion. Please.
- Apparently, just keep your knees together, you sluts.
- Photo op man strikes again.
- And here's where we juxtapose.
- The Krauthammer Kronikles.
- Stop him before he photo ops again!
- Retardopedia!
- Conservative media darling? Eh, not so much.
- Transparency! Accountability! Batshit crazy, tin...
- Um ... huh?
- The backlash must have been savage.
- Compassionate Christianity? Not so much ...
- Dear Ezra:
- How deranged are you ...
- When stupid journalists journalize.
- Yes, that's my kind of humour.
- I'm sorry ... that's a sport?
- The unintentional hilarity.
- Vancouver does Delisle. The world cringes.
- What? The? Hell?
- Stephen Harper: Lying douchebag.
- Irony, oh, irony.
- I know four-year-olds who are better liars than this.
- When Blogging Tories forget their talking points, ...
- The appalling retarditude of Sarah Palin.
- Ezra Levant, and the case of the vanishing correct...
- Blogwhore!
- Let the desperate Sarah-flavoured rationalizations...
- When unbelievably retarded Hunters blog.
- Ezra, Ezra, Ezra ...
- In case you missed it, ...
- Your CC HQ reading assignment, should you decide t...
- Quitbull! Juxtapose!
- And that whole "Innocent until proven guilty" bull...
- Time for another line of work, Steve.
- I Miss The 70s
- What the left hand giveth, the right hand taketh a...
- When stupid Blogging Tories blog.
- Your regular Ezratude.
- Submitted without comment.
- You can feel the love.
- The man who would (not) be Prime Minister.
- Pithy. It's what's for dinner.
- Your mission: Today's CC HQ reader challenge.
- There isn't enough tin-foil on the planet for this.
- Quickly, to my fainting couch!
- Suddenly, the media are their BFFs. Go figure.
- Pay attention, 'cuz I'm only saying this once.
- Strategery! The tactical brilliance of Stephen Ha...
- Kittehs.
- So Long And Thanks For All Teh Fishes
- Every conversation you've ever had with a Blogging...
- Be nice to people you meet on the way up, ...
- When truly stupid Blogging Tories blog.
- Profiles in Accountability, Part the Next
- The madness of King Stephen.
- Triumph of the Wank.
- "Barbara Kay, to the Damage Control Desk. Barbara...
- Wankers, prorogation and a new CC HQ reader challe...
- In the kitchen with Dawg.
- Thank you, CBC.
- I've been thinking of a career change.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Part deux.
- HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
- Support Right To Play, Shame On VANOC And General ...
- The Vancouver Olympics: What could possibly go wr...
- I could swear it wasn't April 1.
-
▼
February
(99)
12 comments:
Good lord, looks like a Geocities website circa 1996.
Looks to me like someone saw it was available and decided to do a little online ratfuck. It's registered via reg.ca (whose website also looks like it was designed by someone stuck back in Web 1.0) which is run by Helen and Graham Laverty, whoever they are.
It doesn't even meet the low bar of web design set by rallyfacts.ca. Hey, on that subject, you should go take a look at the comments... I'm guessing their forum didn't go as planned as they turned off commenting. As far as my post there went... it looks like they wanted to make sure I couldn't get the last word... it's truly amusing.
Cheers!
One should never combine web design with heavy drinking.
Ooo... somebody at the Liberal party brain trust is going to be a little bit annoyed with the web design department for the little oversight of not registering liberals.ca sooner.
A glance at the page, though, suggests that the people behind it might be involved with the BC Marijuana Party. There's some kicks at Stephen Harper here too.
It's all in the s.
Well, someone who thinks they're associated with the Marijuana party might explain the design...
But, I think the message (what there is of it) is more oriented to pro-Conservative and none of the rest.
The only positive image there is of Harper, with an official Con graphic, which banners the rest. It seems to be selling Cons as less 'scary' and more moderate than the BC Liberals (who aren't what I consider Liberals, but SoCreds who couldn't get elected as SoCreds anymore so they took over the provincial Liberal set up, nevermind what Bill VdZ is trying to revenant)
The juxtaposition of the fed Cons vs the provincial Libs is apples vs oranges, but trying to hit people where they're angry.
Given the 'forum' is staledated info from 2005/2006, all fluffing Federal Cons or dissing the Provincials, this looks unlike the MaryJane Party, as the site references the MP as not the only ones getting stoned.
This seems just more of the Usual Suspects waxing paroxysmic over Their Guys TM getting into power while being 'funny'.
MP people have more on the ball even when stoned.
I dunno about the Liberal Party having to register every permutation of Liberal. They already have liberal.ca (as sassy pointed out).
What if self-identified liberals (as opposed to party members) wanted to setup a website a la progressivebloggers.ca? I very much believe you should only register domains you intend to use, squatting on domains always rubbed me the wrong way. It blocks expression on the web, by restricting identity to others with claims on the term used. (Registering a single domain in with respect to a trademark is a good idea, but all permutations is a little excessive).
Though since I am in a very obvious minority, I acknowledge they may want to do something with liberalparty.ca and liberalpartyofcanada.ca as well..
I wouldn't mind so much if these pathetic efforts weren't so damn artless/childish all the time.
Do we need yet another reminder that we're surrounded by cretins with too much time on their hands?
hard for me to call it ratfucking when it's so clearly a fraud.
KEvron
Whatever. Sucks and blows at the same time. Net result = looks like a typical NewCon job.
Think you just gave that site more attention and traffic than it has had in years. Most recent post on 'the forums' is from a little over three years ago.
Is now Wednesday, February 10. CC is MIA. So —
Blizzards in Washington, Baltimore & Philadelphia show us that Global Warming is a hoax, or at least over. So why oh why can't King Stephen get it to snow in Vancouver? Why does it have to be so warm, right when the Right Honorable wants chilly? Is God pissed?
Precipitation does not equal temp
Post a Comment