Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
March
(178)
- Don't clutter his mind with facts ... he's thinking.
- Praise the Lord, and pass the financial statements.
- An obituary for the Olympic spirit.
- Stephen Harper channels his inner petulant, infant...
- Let me use short words so even conservatives can u...
- Canada's most famous exports: Cold air masses and...
- And in other non-Blogging Tory news ...
- "Sure I can count. One, two ... lots."
- Hold on ... that didn't come out quite right.
- Man, that's gonna leave a mark. Or maybe not.
- Awwwwwwwkward.
- If James Taranto says it, it must be true.
- House of cards
- And stepping into the nearest phone booth, he re-e...
- Well, no, but you can SEE it from there.
- Ann Althouse explained
- It worked so well before, didn't it?
- There's one in every crowd.
- No, Stephen, you can't sit here -- this is the GRO...
- Somehow, the word "whiny" leaps to mind.
- Actually, when there's only one of them, it's call...
- Apparently, yesterday's bullshit is inoperative.
- The CC reader challenge: Spot the logical absurdity.
- Now it's personal.
- MY religious sensibilities trump YOUR religious se...
- No, he's a dumbass all by himself; he doesn't need...
- Swift Boat Jason at the Helm
- English, as she is spoke.
- First thing, let's kill all the law students.
- If he could have slipped a double negative in ther...
- Your one-stop shop for right-wing dumbassitude.
- He'll give you some damned fine advice on abortion...
- Blogging Tories Short Takes: Mar 24, 2007.
- And out there in the real world ...
- Now, I'm not saying you're fat, but ...
- About those role models of yours, Joel ...
- You sure you don't want to rephrase, Stephen?
- When the shoe is on the other foot.
- There's something I think you should know.
- What do you call 200 Blogging Tories at the bottom...
- I only hit you because I love you.
- Just for the sake of completeness, ya know.
- No! Really? The latest installment.
- My God, I love being right.
- A gathering of turkeys.
- Don't rush him ... he's rationalizing.
- ... and I don't use the word "pathological" lightly.
- A few dollars more.
- How not to sell a book
- How to sell a book.
- GOTCHA!
- Um ... about all that right-wing outrage over "per...
- Right-wing schizophrenia, as it were.
- Yeah, that explains a lot, doesn't it?
- Checks and Balances
- Welcome to the real world.
- Taking "stupid" to a whole new level.
- When are you simply too stupid to forgive?
- Oh, irony, where is thy ... oh, THERE it is.
- Now THAT'S what I call "compassionate conservatism."
- Hey, Matt -- an apology would be nice.
- Fuck you and your demand for civility.
- The Afghan Slide
- More stories your Blogging Tories won't tell you.
- When even the crazies back slowly toward the exits.
- Stories your Blogging Tories never told you.
- Your White House Press Corpse.
- I read it on Drudge, it MUST be true.
- When really, really, REALLY stupid people get ahol...
- Sorry ... when did THAT happen?
- rehydration
- Your occasional Joel.
- I'm assuming that's the royal "we," right?
- Well, there WAS that other time, Steve.
- I swear, I'm getting dumber by osmosis.
- The mote in one's eye.
- Hey, Doc, that's what ellipses are for.
- Alberto Gonzales Death Watch.
- Garth and Stephane's Excellent Adventure.
- Worst Site of All Time!
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- Totally freaky March Madness.
- Dear Jonathan: Let me explain the word "partisan."
- I'm sure there's some irony in here somewhere.
- O Captain (of industry), My Captain!
- A wanker's gotta have his priorities.
- Buckle up ... this is going to be fun.
- Wanker of the Day: Backseat Blogger.
- The Kate McMillan "When hell freezes over" post.
- Well, OK, but that's the ONLY one we lied about.
- I guess compassionate conservatism has its limits.
- BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING ... uh ...
- Stories your Blogging Tories never told you.
- Pope goes the weasel
- Oooooooooooh ...
- Dear BB: Over-generalize much?
- Pervez? Pervez who?
- It's Wednesday, so they must care about the childr...
- When bad things happen to dumb people.
- Lies, lies ...
-
▼
March
(178)
4 comments:
MarkC is correct. Jean is Commander-in-Chief. Hillier is Chief of Defence Staff.
I suspect I was being too subtle. The point I was making is that Mark was wondering whether the opposition parties would "criticize" Jean as they've criticized Hillier, when those are two entirely different situations.
You have to excuse Mark. He appears to get all short of breath at the sight of a woman in cadpat.
I don't think I heard the "support of the mission" in quite the way Mark is trying to put forward. It looked to me more like promoting an idea.
How long has she got to go, anyway?
The point I was making is that Mark was wondering whether the opposition parties would "criticize" Jean as they've criticized Hillier, when those are two entirely different situations.
Oh, I get it now. Man, you are sharp.
Post a Comment