Friday, March 02, 2007

All the news that's fit to ignore: Part 2.


Having already gifted annoying commenter "goombah" with a new orifice back here, we now move on to show how, even as goombah is staggering to his feet from that first bludgeoning of irrefutable logic, we can deliver yet another good hoof to the family jewels.

See, it's not only that the Blogging Tories, for the most part, ignore the objectively real news in exchange for promoting complete fluff. No, what makes it even more hilarious is that they ignore the news that relates directly to the very basis of their ideological worldview.

These are the people who whine on and on and teeth-gnashingly on about supporting the troops and if you don't support the troops, you're a traitor and how, by God, the most important thing you can do for the troops is to wear red every Friday and nauseatingly idiotic rubbish like that. And yet, curiously, when breaking news involves how thousands of wounded and disabled American soldiers are living in disgusting conditions at the Walter Reed medical facility, what you get from these troop-loving patriots is ... crickets. A total and deafening silence.

It's sort of like whinging on endlessly about being pro-family and pro-life and how desperately you care about the children, then being monumentally disinterested in the ongoing story of a 9-year-old Canadian boy who's locked up in a Texas detention facility in appalling conditions.

No, goombah, you don't get a pass on this. When you're part of a blogging collective that's made an entire career out of telling heart-wrenching stories about how much you love the soldiers and the children, you don't get to avert your eyes when real news about those very topics finally explodes onto the screen. You don't get to ignore those stories just so you have more time and blog space to tell us all about how Al Gore has a big house, you dim-witted little weasel. Is any of this sinking in?

What is, of course, amusing about all of this is that, while the lower forms of life in the right-wing, Canadian wankersphere (a.k.a. the "Blogging Tories") have spared no energy in ignoring these stories, it's ironically all those troop-hating, baby-killing lefties who've been all over these current events like a Catholic priest on an altar boy.

Note carefully that, while the White House is doing everything it can to downplay the Walter Reed scandal, it's the Democrats who are leaping into action to do something about it. And while the BTs apparently couldn't give a shit about a Canadian boy incarcerated in Texas, it's the Progressive Bloggers of Canada who've been burning up the blogosphere trying to get something done. Or hadn't you noticed, goombah?

So it's not only that the BTs are ignoring the objectively big news these days, they're ignoring the big news that you normally can't get them to shut the fuck up about. Unless it turns out to be ideologically inconvenient. Then they can't avert their eyes fast enough.

Coming later today: Part 3, in which we tie up some loose ends, and send goombah on his way back to Stupidville.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

"No, goombah, you don't get a pass on this. When you're part of a blogging collective that's made an entire career out of telling heart-wrenching stories about how much you love the soldiers and the children, you don't get to avert your eyes when real news about those very topics finally explodes onto the screen. You don't get to ignore those stories just so you have more time and blog space to tell us all about how Al Gore has a big house, you dim-witted little weasel. Is any of this sinking in?"

I did not ignore any of the stories you speak of here, I just didn't comment on them. I'm not a Blogging Tory, I don't belong to any group. I'm just someone who read your stuff and thought I'd have a laugh at your hypocritical penchant for name-calling about stuff you do yourself.
Nice try, by the way, to deflect attention away from what I actually wrote to what you'd like to believe I wrote. However, I am sure that most of the people who will peruse your site will have better reading, and logic, skills than your appear to have.

Anonymous said...

And, hopefully, better spelling skills than I appear to have.

Ti-Guy said...

You're as dumb as a box of hammers, Goombah.

M@ said...

Well, I'm no grammatarian or nothin', but I don't think the antecedent for "you" was goombah. The sentence "When you're part of a blogging collective..." shifts the antecedent from goombah to the collective members of the BTs. Since you're defending them, your position seems to be similar to theirs, hence the confusion.

The fact that "you" has two different antecedents in two consecutive sentences is a little confusing, yes. But I think looking at it from this perspective makes CC's point a lot clearer.

Anonymous said...

"Since you're defending them, your position seems to be similar to theirs, hence the confusion."

Where did I defend them? In fact, somewhere in here I actually did give my opinion on CC's stories-of-choice and said that my views were probably similar to the opinions of he and his cohorts. I differ from the crowd by not refusing to point out his whining hypocrisy.
As for the grammatical breakdown, even if we assume you are correct, M@, CC would be giving a passionate response to something I wasn't referring to; a case of "nice answer to another question".

M@ said...

Where did I defend them?

I meant that you defended their right to ignore stories that CC cares about -- I didn't mean to imply you defended the content or merit of their posts. Sorry to confuse.

David Webb said...

Goombah, we understand your point. EVERYONE gets it. The thing is, only you think CC is a hypocrite. Good for you for standing up and saying what you think. You just have to accept that all the other posters think that you are wrong. Enjoy life as the iconoclast you are, but please stop insisting that you are misunderstood.

We get it.

Anonymous said...

hmmm... interesting, all this from someone who thinks anyone wants to see his stupid cat. You're getting a hard-on over posts of your cat and frothing at the mouth over two stories(at least one of which is being dealt with - and you don't like the solution... whine whine whine).

But, acting like a child has been a classic strength of yours.