Patrick Ross has just assured me that he will defeat my Rule 4.33 Application on August 20 (without explaining how). He has also suggested that my simply reporting on this upcoming hearing constitutes malicious defamation.
I guess we'll see in about a month.
2 comments:
It is questionable whether Patrick appreciates that filing motions within his current actions would be ineffective. His lawsuits against multiple parties, including yourself, have in some instances remained stagnant since 2020, with no meaningful procedural progress for years. Under such circumstances, a court would likely interpret any new motions as a belated and futile attempt to advance proceedings that are effectively beyond repair.
Additionally, Patrick has failed to comply with court directions requiring him to update the court regarding his bankruptcy status—an obligation imposed during prior hearings, either in your matter or in proceedings involving Peter Skinner. Compounding this issue is his apparent failure to rectify prior misrepresentations on the record concerning that same bankruptcy status.
There is also the unresolved issue of service. His listed service address is no longer valid, and repeated attempts by Peter Skinner to effect service at the Lloydminster address have been unsuccessful. This raises further procedural deficiencies that undermine the viability of his claims.
Taken together, these factors suggest a pattern of conduct inconsistent with a litigant genuinely seeking to advance or succeed in legal proceedings, notwithstanding his stated confidence in his legal abilities.
Craig Anderson: I, at least, have no issue with serving Patrick since, in his moronic 2022 lawsuit against me, he listed his email address and, under Alberta law, that is considered an acceptance of service by email.
Also complicating Patrick's grandiose delusions of further legal action against me is his current debt to me of over $125,000, representing his adamant refusal to pay either the original 2010 Ontario judgment or any costs awards for the last 15 years. I suspect the Alberta courts are not going to look kindly on someone who wants to keep filing frivolous and asinine actions while refusing to pay court-ordered costs every time he loses.
Post a Comment