Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(3428)
-
▼
November
(282)
- Is it just me ...
- Let me explain the concept of an "analogy."
- When the mainstream media does its job.
- One of these things is not like the other.
- Document the dumbassitude.
- And a pony.
- Take a deep breath. Smell that?
- Don't Worry Kids!
- Distractions
- What does that even mean?
- Because they really do need babysitting, that's why.
- You know it's coming.
- Thanks for coming, Stephen.
- Sunday Funnies.
- In twenty words or less ...
- Left hand, meet right hand.
- It's because they lie. All the time.
- When total douchebags blog.
- Kill him. Kill him dead.
- Who knew …
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
- Left, right, left, right ...
- Oh la la …
- How stupid? Tom Lukiwski stupid, that's how stupid.
- Dear Harper Youth: Let's talk about "democracy," ...
- Democracy in action, baby.
- I'm just sayin' ...
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Ignorant dumbass open thread.
- Cry, Stephen, ...
- Oooooooooooh ...
- I know! I know!
- When totally douchebaggy fuckwits blog.
- The lies of Stephen Harper.
- Dance, Big Daddy, dance.
- Document the dumbfuckitude.
- Oh, for fuck's sake, Stephen!
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
- Leaving a trail of urine wherever he goes ...
- Carthago delenda est.
- Show me your tits. Again and again and ...
- Free speech, motherfucker!
- What Adam Radwanski said.
- Document the screeching assholitude.
- How ... odd.
- Julie Morand Terrorism Watch: Day Two.
- Dear dumbfucks: Elections have consequences.
- Your lede of the week.
- By the way, Stephen, ...
- All politics, all the time.
- Attention Liberals
- Let The Kid Keep The Pony
- As Google slowly awakens to its task ...
- Just Awesome!
- You have the right to shut the hell up and take it.
- And you're ugly and your mother dresses you funny,...
- Um, yeah, but that's different.
- *Sigh*.
- A Vote To Rock!
- It's because I'm an evil prick, that's why.
- Ask a stupid question.
- And suddenly ...
- Apparently, it was dr. roy's turn ...
- Just because ...
- And that cloud? It looks just like an aborted fet...
- Hello? CDNBA? Best feminist blog?
- What kind of fuckery is this?
- Dear Canadian Blog Awards: I'm going to enjoy this.
- Fucking liberal media.
- But on the third hand ...
- Yeah, that sounds about right.
- How very Hunteresque of him.
- Your regular Denyseitude.
- Oh, dear ... that's gonna leave a mark.
- Dear Paul: Generalize much?
- Go fuck off.
- Sorry ... how did you spell your name again?
- Finally! A Movie Worth Seeing.
- That's good advice, Doc, I'd support that.
- ... and that's when reality slapped him in the fac...
- Dear CDNBA: Bite me. Again.
- If she were any less self-aware ...
- Conservative Clothing...
- Most Illogical
- Dear Kate: Shut the fuck up.
- Up is down, black is white.
- All the news …
- Sunday Funnies.
- Sunday Is For Cath-o-licks
- HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
- There's stupid, and there's Blogging Tory stupid.
- Somewhere ...
- What do we have for the even bigger losers, Johnny?
- They Spelled Ignatieff Wrong
- Janke's Cover Blown
- Today Is Sponsored By...
- Oh, please, dear God ...
- Ooooooh, snap!
- I am ninja cat ...
- How can we miss her if she won't go away?
-
▼
November
(282)
4 comments:
Shorter Stephen Harper: "What do you mean, you can't be my lawyer anymore just because I made all this shit up and lied to you about everything? I lie to Canadians all the time -- what makes you so fucking special? Hello? Hello?"
Popcorn anyone?
Clients lie to the lawyers all the time. No one cares. If a lawyer lies to the court, or introduces evidence he knows to be false. then all the lawyers and judges care. Even among lawyers, there are some ethical standards. But for the record, I doubt that could be the problem when your client is the prime minister of Canada.
"But for the record, I doubt that could be the problem when your client is the prime minister of Canada."
Actually, I would think it would be double the problem when your client is the prime minister.
A lawyer is obliged to serve his client only so far as he does not breach the law himself, or countenance his client's breaching the law. That's the reason most lawyers are really careful about what information they require from their clients. They cannot legally argue that someone is not guilty when they know for a fact that he is guilty.
WV: spunchie
Post a Comment