It's amazing how transparent the Con apologists are, really. Almost every post that's not horrified at Raitt criticizes the form rather than the content. The meaning of "sexy". Should the Herald have published. Is there a conspiracy. Blaming the staffer for misplacing that binder that was Raitt's responsibility and should not have been given to her in the first place.
4 comments:
Gonna be an interesting day in Ottawa tomorrow...
interesting? i'd call it sexy!
pffft.
It's amazing how transparent the Con apologists are, really. Almost every post that's not horrified at Raitt criticizes the form rather than the content. The meaning of "sexy". Should the Herald have published. Is there a conspiracy. Blaming the staffer for misplacing that binder that was Raitt's responsibility and should not have been given to her in the first place.
Not a damn word about what Raitt actually said.
Post a Comment