Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
October
(110)
- Deja vu all over again.
- None dare call it "censorship."
- Concealed carry for me, but not for thee.
- Mom! Mom! Hey, Mom! Look at me! Mom! MOM! MO...
- When dumbass bloggers attack.
- Don't cloud the issue with facts, dammit!
- I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
- Heh heh ... I love being right.
- ... and in conclusion, you smell bad.
- Heh. Indeed.
- Canada: The world's peacekeepers?
- Whoopsie.
- Irony is officially dead.
- Sunday morning snark-o-rama.
- Right whingers ar stoopid.
- If you squint, you can just tell the difference.
- Kreationists ar stoopid.
- Got water?
- And now, dumbassitude that requires no introductio...
- Heh. Indeed.
- Crap crap crappity crap.
- Where's the outrage, Denyse? HERE'S the outrage.
- Airwolf: The awesome awesomeitude.
- The mote in one's eye, and all that.
- Hyper-ventilate much?
- Great minds think alike, fools seldom differ.
- Flaherty, rump melon of the week.
- Right-wing humour, as it were.
- Immunity gone...
- For reasons I shouldn't have to explain ...
- Yeah, about that "civility" thing ...
- Pay no attention to those climatic catastrophes, K...
- SHRRIIIEEEEKKKKK!!!! Never mind, we're good here.
- The classics never go out of style.
- Let's not contaminate a good rant with accuracy.
- Because you always need a good punchline.
- Can you say "shameless pandering," boys and girls?
- Faith resolved!
- The stupid! It burns!
- If the irony were any thicker ...
- Gie us a wee dram...
- Get down ...
- Dinesh D'Souza: The gift that keeps on giving.
- Please tell me that this is a joke.
- That's some serious irony you got going there, Steve.
- Nice family you got there ...
- Would someone explain to Mark Steyn the meaning of...
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 16, 2007.
- Sometimes playing to your demographic isn't such a...
- They're so adorable when they're that optimistic.
- The Blogging Tories get their Al Gore marching ord...
- Yeah, about that prudent fiscal restraint ...
- Don't hold your breath waiting for a retraction.
- The bottomless bucket o' irony.
- Heh.
- I'm just sayin'.
- Stenography, as it is done.
- Just another day in Wingnuttia.
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 12, 2007.
- Those popping sounds you hear ...
- You can feel the intellectual vacuum from here.
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 12, 2007.
- Let's talk about hiding behind kids, shall we?
- Your "liberal" media in action.
- It's all a matter of perspective, isn't it?
- Somehow, the name "Dick" just works, doesn't it?
- Smithers ... release the hounds!
- There's "raising the bar," and then there's ...
- If you want to bitch slap Kathy Shaidle, you'll ha...
- Into the wayback machine, Sherman.
- Unhinged Catholic, redux.
- Time to reap the whirlwind, eh, Dick?
- A world of philosophy in eight little words.
- Yeah, that's kinda bad timing, don't you think?
- Must ... resist ... cheap shot ...
- It's why you read Chester.
- Even Bible-whomping SDA whackjobs have their limit...
- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
- "Can you hear me now? No? Can you hear me now? N...
- And sometimes, the market gets it right.
- Would you like an extra chair for your second pers...
- That's why they call it crime AND punishment, Larry.
- Oh, that gosh-darned "liberal" media.
- "Welcome to Microsoft technical support ..."
- Richard Evans, the Calgary Sun and setting the rec...
- Dear Cjunk: Let me explain that for you.
- "What? Was it something I said?"
- So long, Zorph, and thanks for all the fish.
- One of these things is not like the others ...
- Funny you should mention that, Paul ...
- Slow news day at CNN.
- 'Cuz it's all about the kids, remember?
- Dick Evans: Pulling back the curtain, and time to...
- Richard Evans: The early days.
- What? Gays should have RIGHTS? Since WHEN!?
- PZ does Canadian crackpot Denyse O'Leary ...
- Who are these people? And why are they all CC?
- When dangerous weiners attack.
- lads and lasses...
- And sometimes, high-tech isn't all it's cracked up...
-
▼
October
(110)
8 comments:
You're completely misrepresenting Mr. Ross's position...he believes we should invade Minnesota (and I'm sure I could find it, once I get hold of a map)...if not, then we're fascists.
Honestly, I think people like Mr. Ross have a point sometimes about liberals. We often don't see the big picture.
"You're completely misrepresenting Mr. Ross's position...he believes we should invade Minnesota (and I'm sure I could find it, once I get hold of a map)...if not, then we're fascists." ....tiguy
Google says.....
"It just never occurs to me to go parsing language and inventing reasons to turn what people say into something else." ------ tiguy Friday, June 8, 2007
kerryman number 1717 -- what does Google say about "sarcasm"? Have you tried that search yet? Wikipedia is good too.
Come on, Cynic. I don't consider you a liberal.
That would be misrepresenting liberalism.
Dude, no one wants to read your blog. Shill somewhere else.
I wonder when Patrick will write a blog post complaining about the dismissal of Ward Churchill? I mean, one dangerous lunatic can be protected by a fake "free speech" screed, they all should, right?
Ah, but he is buddies with Patels so that does explain a lot.
Having a dialogue with Pats is like talking to a vacuum cleaner.
W.O.W.
Just W.O.W.
I always knew you were immature Patrick Ross, I also knew you were far more capable of writing words than understanding them, but even for you this exercise regarding this matter and how desperately you have tried to make it into something it clearly is not reaches a new low in assholery all right. The irony that exists between the name of your blog as you intended it to be taken and the reality of it is one of the most painfully acute examples I have seen in a long time. I mean really, it is not just your lack of comprehension and your fixated nature upon your vision of reality no matter what facts, reason, and logic say to the contrary but also your mean spiritedness and your clear and obvious love of inflicting pain and suffering (at least that is clearly/obviously what you intend, you aren't actually very good at it in this medium except in terms of how painful simply reading your delusions is) upon those you dislike/disagree with, especially politically.
I take politics far more seriously than you ever will, and I know full well that as important as it is to live totally through the lens of one's politics is to live a very narrow and rigid life and to deny much of the full human experience. This is why I say you are immature PR, not merely for the juvenility of your opinions and your attitudes towards those you disagree with but also because you have such a narrow and absolutist pov on things like politics, much like a child who is incapable of sufficiently complex abstract thought to handle the vagaries, complexities and shadings of gray/nuances that not just politics but life itself is full of.
You are a very pitiable little boy at heart going/judging by your online persona and if your online persona is anything remotely an accurate reflection of your offline approach to life then I have great pity for those around you, especially those of much more mature minds that care for you despite your obvious limitations. I leave this here because I *KNOW* you well enough to not expect you to leave it posted or at the minimum to leave it unaltered, besides, it will get a lot more readership here than it could ever expect to get there no matter how much trolling of your site you do in the blogosphere, the quality of the work at this blog is orders of magnitude superior to yours and quality counts for a great deal regarding respectability in the online/blogging world in my experience, at least among real thinkers and not those that live via an ideological filter before all else that is.
Post a Comment