Oh, screw it ... what is wrong with this picture?
And, no, I'm not going to link. What would be the point?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
October
(110)
- Deja vu all over again.
- None dare call it "censorship."
- Concealed carry for me, but not for thee.
- Mom! Mom! Hey, Mom! Look at me! Mom! MOM! MO...
- When dumbass bloggers attack.
- Don't cloud the issue with facts, dammit!
- I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
- Heh heh ... I love being right.
- ... and in conclusion, you smell bad.
- Heh. Indeed.
- Canada: The world's peacekeepers?
- Whoopsie.
- Irony is officially dead.
- Sunday morning snark-o-rama.
- Right whingers ar stoopid.
- If you squint, you can just tell the difference.
- Kreationists ar stoopid.
- Got water?
- And now, dumbassitude that requires no introductio...
- Heh. Indeed.
- Crap crap crappity crap.
- Where's the outrage, Denyse? HERE'S the outrage.
- Airwolf: The awesome awesomeitude.
- The mote in one's eye, and all that.
- Hyper-ventilate much?
- Great minds think alike, fools seldom differ.
- Flaherty, rump melon of the week.
- Right-wing humour, as it were.
- Immunity gone...
- For reasons I shouldn't have to explain ...
- Yeah, about that "civility" thing ...
- Pay no attention to those climatic catastrophes, K...
- SHRRIIIEEEEKKKKK!!!! Never mind, we're good here.
- The classics never go out of style.
- Let's not contaminate a good rant with accuracy.
- Because you always need a good punchline.
- Can you say "shameless pandering," boys and girls?
- Faith resolved!
- The stupid! It burns!
- If the irony were any thicker ...
- Gie us a wee dram...
- Get down ...
- Dinesh D'Souza: The gift that keeps on giving.
- Please tell me that this is a joke.
- That's some serious irony you got going there, Steve.
- Nice family you got there ...
- Would someone explain to Mark Steyn the meaning of...
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 16, 2007.
- Sometimes playing to your demographic isn't such a...
- They're so adorable when they're that optimistic.
- The Blogging Tories get their Al Gore marching ord...
- Yeah, about that prudent fiscal restraint ...
- Don't hold your breath waiting for a retraction.
- The bottomless bucket o' irony.
- Heh.
- I'm just sayin'.
- Stenography, as it is done.
- Just another day in Wingnuttia.
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 12, 2007.
- Those popping sounds you hear ...
- You can feel the intellectual vacuum from here.
- Simple answers to simple questions: Oct 12, 2007.
- Let's talk about hiding behind kids, shall we?
- Your "liberal" media in action.
- It's all a matter of perspective, isn't it?
- Somehow, the name "Dick" just works, doesn't it?
- Smithers ... release the hounds!
- There's "raising the bar," and then there's ...
- If you want to bitch slap Kathy Shaidle, you'll ha...
- Into the wayback machine, Sherman.
- Unhinged Catholic, redux.
- Time to reap the whirlwind, eh, Dick?
- A world of philosophy in eight little words.
- Yeah, that's kinda bad timing, don't you think?
- Must ... resist ... cheap shot ...
- It's why you read Chester.
- Even Bible-whomping SDA whackjobs have their limit...
- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
- "Can you hear me now? No? Can you hear me now? N...
- And sometimes, the market gets it right.
- Would you like an extra chair for your second pers...
- That's why they call it crime AND punishment, Larry.
- Oh, that gosh-darned "liberal" media.
- "Welcome to Microsoft technical support ..."
- Richard Evans, the Calgary Sun and setting the rec...
- Dear Cjunk: Let me explain that for you.
- "What? Was it something I said?"
- So long, Zorph, and thanks for all the fish.
- One of these things is not like the others ...
- Funny you should mention that, Paul ...
- Slow news day at CNN.
- 'Cuz it's all about the kids, remember?
- Dick Evans: Pulling back the curtain, and time to...
- Richard Evans: The early days.
- What? Gays should have RIGHTS? Since WHEN!?
- PZ does Canadian crackpot Denyse O'Leary ...
- Who are these people? And why are they all CC?
- When dangerous weiners attack.
- lads and lasses...
- And sometimes, high-tech isn't all it's cracked up...
-
▼
October
(110)
3 comments:
If they had the best advertisers and the best subscribers and failed, what the heck was in their business plan? Government subsidies?
Maybe it was written by a supply side blogging tory who figured the more they reduced their rates, the more money they would make.
The WS HAD no business plan. Except for the original editor (Libin), no one else had ever worked on a magazine or sold advertising. They had some investors with deep pockets and that was about it. They chased away pretty much anyone who was competent through their verbal and mental abuse. Levant et al. were/are not good people.
"Mainstream"? Yeah, right and William F. Buckley is a screaming liberal moonbat.
Post a Comment