I checked with Google AI to verify that members of the public are allowed to spectate the upcoming August 20 Rule 4.33 hearing via Webex and, sure enough:
I will provide the Webex dial-in link much closer to the actual date.
BONUS TRACK: Man, some of you people get up early. Last commenter wonders whether Patrick can dial in to his upcoming hearing on August 20 and, if he does, whether he will be visible to other people who dial in. According to Google AI, if Patrick has the right to dial in and he does so, he must have his camera on:
That is, all active parties in the proceeding must have their cameras on and must be visible to everyone dialed in to the hearing. As I am represented by counsel, that condition does not apply to me.
7 comments:
Holy shit ... does the Grande Prairie courthouse have the bandwidth to handle all the people who are going to dial in to watch this? Are you going to be there?
Anon @ 5:52 AM: I have a lawyer representing me in this matter, so I do not need to attend, but I will most likely simply dial in and spectate.
When we dial in (oh, man I cannot wait for this), will all 400 pounds of Patrick be visible? What if he connects by Webex and doesn't turn his camera on?
I just realized that August 20 is the day after Patrick's 5-year "interestversary." What a coincidence.
This will be better than any pro wrestling PPV event.
What happens if Patrick doesn't show?
Anon @ 9:23 AM: Well, it wouldn't be the first time Patrick blew off a court appearance. Remember that way back in 2010, when I sued him, he so arrogantly thought I couldn't touch him that he didn't even file a Statement of Defence. That ended really badly for him when I had him declared in default and won my $85,000 judgment.
In this case, it would also end spectacularly badly for him, since he has already publicly admitted he's been properly served. If he simply didn't appear on August 20, the judge would take submissions only from my lawyer, pretty much guaranteeing I would win.
Frankly, I'm not sure there's much value in him showing up, anyway, since he has no argument in the way of defence; he refused to advance this lawsuit in even the smallest way for over three years, so it's toast. All he would accomplish is to embarrass himself in front of the viewing audience.
Post a Comment