My new Lloydminster-based confidential informant will be providing me with regular updates regarding any activity around Casa Ross; here's a very recent pic showing the same storage trailer that appears to have been there for quite some time:
so it's not clear what's going on, but I am assured I will be informed in short order of any sudden changes in the status of that property. All surveillance is perfectly legal, despite what some shrieky conspiracy theorists and undischarged bankrupts might suggest.
7 comments:
We asked ChatGPT to perform a psychological analysis of Patrick "Twatsy" Ross based on his activity on the @OutlawTory account on the Twitter/X app. The response is quite incisive and accurate. Our only quibble is the lack of emphasis on Twatrick's substantially below-average intelligence. However, the emphasis on cognitive inflexibility is common among low-IQ and conservative people.
Patrick Ross, the man behind the OutlawTory account, exhibits a personality that appears deeply driven by anger, resentment, and a need for validation. Based on his online behavior, we can analyze the psychological factors contributing to his temperament.
1. Sense of Persecution and Victimhood
Ross frequently presents himself as a victim of injustice, which fuels his aggression. He seems to believe that he is constantly under attack, whether from ideological opponents, legal issues, or societal forces. This mindset aligns with a cognitive distortion called hostile attribution bias, where one interprets neutral or even positive actions as threats.
2. Fragile Ego and Narcissistic Traits
Despite his bluster, Ross exhibits signs of a fragile ego. His frequent need to assert dominance, his inability to handle criticism, and his exaggerated sense of grievance suggest a narcissistic wound. Individuals with such traits often lash out when their self-image is threatened, which may explain his explosive online rants.
3. Failure and Externalization of Blame
Ross has experienced significant personal and legal failures, yet he rarely takes responsibility for them. Instead, he externalizes blame, painting himself as the target of conspiracies or malicious actors. This psychological defense mechanism prevents self-reflection but increases his anger toward perceived enemies.
4. Social Isolation and Online Radicalization
His social interactions appear primarily online, where he engages in combative discourse. This isolation can exacerbate negative emotions, as he lacks grounding influences that could temper his aggression. The internet also provides a space where extreme views are reinforced, leading to a cycle of perpetual outrage.
5. Power and Control Issues
Ross craves control over his narrative and over others. When he feels powerless—whether due to legal troubles, financial struggles, or social rejection—he reacts with aggression. His anger is a way to reassert control, even if only in an online setting.
6. Psychological Rigidity
His worldview is inflexible, and any challenge to it is met with hostility. This rigidity suggests cognitive inflexibility, often associated with personality disorders or deeply ingrained ideological conditioning. People with such traits struggle to adapt to new realities, leading to frustration and anger.
Conclusion
Patrick Ross's anger seems rooted in a combination of fragile self-esteem, chronic victimhood, social isolation, and an inability to take responsibility for his failures. His online persona reflects an individual who uses rage as both a shield and a weapon—deflecting personal accountability while attacking those he blames for his misfortunes.
ROD: Is this for real? Actually generated by ChatGPT? That's ... wild.
ROD: I'm fascinated by Patrick being described as being driven by (among other things) a "need for validation", since that explains a number of things.
As I've mentioned before, Patrick has this childish habit of tagging many of his tweets with the "laughing so hard you cry" emoji, which is understandable since, given that few people read him and would praise him as being funny, he is reduced to validating *himself* as hilariously funny.
And there is his habit of relentlessly hashtagging his tweets with "#abpoli" or "#cdnpoli" in a desperate attempt to draw attention to himself and validate his importance.
Regardless of where that diagnosis came from, it's eerily accurate.
We have used AI for various tasks, with mixed results. However, that analysis of Twatrick Ross is amazingly accurate, and probably better than most psychologists would have produced.
I'm not sure where this fits into the profile, but I recall that Patrick used to frequently reply to women with attractive profile pictures, attempting to say something suave and entertaining. I'm guessing he desperately wanted some sort of validation that he was amusing and clever. It was particularly funny when he tried stuff like that with well-known female athletes, especially pro wrestlers, as if he somehow had a shot.
Now THAT is eerie.
It's hard to believe that diagnosis was written by AI given that it's so crazy dead-on about Patrick. I've been following this tragedy for a while and I don't think you can summarize Patrick better than "a combination of fragile self-esteem, chronic victimhood, social isolation, and an inability to take responsibility for his failures."
The fragile self-esteem matches what you said earlier about his obsession with tagging so many of his tweets in order to attract more eyeballs. The chronic victimhood doesn't even need any explanation. The social isolation is kind of obvious since in all of the pictures he posts, he never has anyone with him. It's always him by himself at a rock concert, a rodeo, a restaurant -- there is no evidence that he has any friends at all. And his inability to take responsibility for anything is kind of obvious.
The most depressing part of this is that over all these years, Patrick doesn't seem to have grown. At all. He could easily be in his early 20s based on the childishness of his tweets. Nothing suggests he has grown as a person over the last decade.
Post a Comment