Wednesday, May 26, 2010

And I'd check the watermark on the paper if I were you.


That 2004 Harper coalition proposal, and the more recent one when others proposed something similar? Totally, totally different. Because shut up.

And fuck off. That, too.

OH, DEAR: The comments section there is a must-read. Seriously.
Posted by at

4 comments:

Sparky said...

"nowhere does Stephen Harper suggest that the three opposition parties wish to form a government. NOWHERE"
That's his proof? 'Cause Harper didn't use the word 'coalition' in his letter?? Can these people even read??
That's like dismissing facts 'cause someone used quotation marks around a paraphrase...

4:04 PM
Anonymous said...

Can these people even read??
Some can read but the bigger question is if they understand.


That answer is "no".

4:10 PM
CC said...

"Hey, I'm not saying that I'll kill your family if you testify. I'm just saying that that's a nice family you got there, and it'd be a shame if anything happened to them."

(Time passes.)

"Your Honour, I can assure you that at no time did my client explicitly threaten the victim. Never. Not one word."

Christ, but these people are fucking stupid.

4:23 PM
double nickel said...

And right on cue...twatsy appears.

5:13 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)