Over here, as America's Dumbest Wanker™ struggles to escape from the quicksand he walked into, he tries to validate his dishonest fantasies by writing (and I am not making this up, go see for yourself in the comments section):
No, because [Clinton] lied about a lot of things, everything he says is automatically suspect.
Sit back and appreciate the delicious irony of Weasel Boy, impugning someone else's integrity based on an alleged history of telling falsehoods. It kind of leaves you speechless, doesn't it?
2 comments:
Lessee - Clinton lied about a blowjob in the Oval Office. Bush lied to start a war.
Makes one wonder, doesn't it?
There's more to it than that. Keep in mind that Clinton lied about something which was in no way a crime. There's nothing prosecutable about consensual sex between two adults (and, recall, it wasn't even actual "sex").
On the other hand, if you want to compare, both Scooter Libby and Bush have lied (repeatedly) about things which are almost certainly crimes -- lying under oath to federal prosecutors and lying to Congress about the rationale for going to war.
That really puts a different spin on things, doesn't it?
Post a Comment