Wednesday, June 21, 2006

I wouldn't line my cat litter box with "Macleans."


As a brief addendum to the earlier post on dumbass Adam Daifallah, let it be known that any magazine that puts a piece of crap like this into print will never see the inside of CC HQ.

Besides, the National Post is far more absorbent.

7 comments:

dveej said...

By the way, whyncha post some pictures of your cats?

Zorpheous said...

I disagree, the Toronto Sun is way more absorbant ;-)

CathiefromCanada said...

I knew there was a good reason I don't bother with Macleans anymore -- Mark Steyn? Pffttt!

Meaghan Walker-Williams said...

"Besides, the National Post is far more absorbent." And often Free! to boot! --

Nope, nothing to worry about in dem circulation figures... nuthin at all, sez I.

famousringo said...

Macleans has about one or two gems an issue. But even the few good articles make me want to claw my eyes out.

Ugliest. Format. Ever.

Mike said...

I can't believe since Macleans has gone so far downhill in the last few years (or maybe I just notice more now). I recall hearing something about new ownership, is this true?
I remember a long article a couple summers back about how Wal-mart was actually pretty nice. That pretty much sealed it for me.

Arianna said...

Mike - Indeed. I don't remember Macleans being this... awful... before. And Mark Steyn? Wtf?