Monday, October 10, 2005

Child molestation, Christian Coalition style.


And here (via AmericaBlog) is your depressingly regular example of conservative family values:

After news broke that local law enforcement officials were investigating complaints that Louis Beres, longtime chairman of the Christian Coalition of Oregon, had molested three female family members when they were pre-teens, The Oregonian in Portland went out and interviewed Beres' family members.

Two told reporters that Beres, indeed, had molested them. All three said they have been interviewed for several hours by detectives.

"I was molested," said one of the women, now in her early 50s. "I was victimized, and I've suffered all my life for it. I'm still afraid to be in the same room with [Beres]."

Quick, cue this guy, who will be happy to explain how everyone is innocent until proven guilty, or how it's all a dirty Democratic smear campaign against a fine Christian, or how those girls were just asking for it, dressing like little tramps, they were. Or something.

HISTORICAL REMINDER: Lest we forget, Beres appears to be only the latest in a series of hypocritical, conservative child molesters:

As the last guy at any dinner party to strenuously oppose the death penalty, I'm happy that Susan Smith's life was spared. But what would have happened if the authorities had caught someone fitting the description of the black man whom she initially accused of kidnaping her babies?

Remember him -- the man described so tearfully by Smith during nine days of press conferences? Her story then, as summarized in USA Today: "Staring down the barrel of a gun, Susan Smith pleaded with the carjacker to let her children out of the car. But the thug sped away . . . taking with him Smith's young sons. . . . And a family prays . . . ."

Leading the prayers, according to the newspaper, was Beverly Russell, 47, the boys' step-grandfather who said, "That's what we need the country to do." It turned out that what Russell needed to do was something more, which was to come clean about his sexual relationship with his stepdaughter that began with fondling and kissing when she was 15 and continued into an adulterous affair right up to a few months before the boys were drowned.

Russell, a prominent leader of the South Carolina Republican Party and the local Christian Coalition, knew that Smith was not the sweet innocent first presented to the media because he had stolen her innocence. When she was only 6, her natural father killed himself over a messy divorce and Russell's marriage to Smith's mother. At the age of 13, Smith attempted suicide, and while aware of her fragile mental state, Russell began his sexual advances two years later. At 17, Smith attempted suicide again. Russell claims that he held off until Smith was married before escalating this sick sexual liaison.

And these are the folks who want to teach you morality.

11 comments:

Cori said...

I challenge anyone to show me a verse in the Bible that says NOT to diddle your daughters.

These people seem to enjoy acting out various Old Testament scenarios. Ewwww.

Jay McHue said...

Thank you, CC, for reminding us that (1) Christians and conservatives are accused of molestation on a daily - if not hourly - basis, (2) it's "innocent until proven guilty" only when non-Christians and liberals are involved, (3) non-Christians and liberals never, ever molest children, (4) there is no such thing as false molestation charges, and (5) you unquestioningly believe 1 through 4.

CC said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah, it's not like hard right-wingers and Republicans would do something as sleazy as, oh, spread malicious and blatantly false rumours about Bill Clinton, treating him as guilty until proven innocent. That would be so ... so ... un-Christian. (See also: Sandy Berger.)

You really are a piece of work, Jinx. My deepest and most profound sympathies to your family.

Jay McHue said...

Sympathies? CC, you have as much sympathy in you as you have tact, rationality and relevence - i.e. none.

But it's interesting that you point out Clinton and Berger. Doing so displays your base hypocrisy for all to see. To you, they were innocent until proven guilty, and to some conservatives (which didn't include me), they were guilty until proven innocent. Now that the tables are turned, you are acting exactly like those conservatives, all while condemning their behavior.

Anonymous said...

gosh, I'm beginning to think I want to see some action in this little feud of yours, CC and Jinx. Who's intellectual penis is bigger? I'm willing to bet its my dear CC, but I guess its what you do with it that matters...

Anonymous said...

You know Jinx, its nice to know you want to wait to see how it falls out in a court of law.

However, the point of the entry was that the religious right are among the first to insist being a Christian makes them a better person, less inclined to lie, steal, cheat, molest, etc. It's in their philosophy, that sense of vindication of their world view rising out of oppression.

And of course, the history of Christianity is littered with the sins of self proclaimed believers, something Christ himself warned about. He even gave us things to look for to recognize the true followers.

Sportin' Life said...

Christians and conservatives are accused of molestation on a daily - if not hourly - basis

LMAO!

I agree, Jinx, the epidemic of false molestation charges against good christian conservatives is just appalling, isn't it? It's a secret campaign run by gay atheists out of an office in West Hollywood, you know.

CC said...

I think Mr. Boser summed it up nicely, pointing out how so many Christians are adamant that they are the moral guradians of society, how they demand the right to legislate morality for the rest of us, how their holy book -- and only their holy book -- can possibly serve as the moral guide and beacon for the rest of humanity and how, as they have a direct pipeline to the Big Kahuna, they must surely represent a moral standard to which the rest of us can only aspire.

Then when they're caught sodomizing altar boys or fucking their children, suddenly it's, "Hey, we're only human, liberals do it, too." Followed by the inevitable, mealy-mouthed apologetics about how such reprehensible human beings were weak, they were tempted, and perhaps they just didn't have enough faith but, no problem, we must join with them and pray for strength, and so on, and so on, and hypocritically so on.

And you will, of course, notice that, in Weasel Boy's entire original comment above, not one fucking word of condemnation for his religious brother. Not one.

It's always someone else's fault, isn't it, Jinx? Always someone else's fault.

Jay McHue said...

However, the point of the entry was that the religious right are among the first to insist being a Christian makes them a better person, less inclined to lie, steal, cheat, molest, etc.

If that's what you (or anyone else) believe, you obviously don't know Christians and the teachings of Christianity as well as you think you do. I don't feel inclined to discuss it at length here, but you are more than welcome to discuss it with Christians and other non-Christians at the TheologyWeb forum, which I frequent quite a bit.

Jay McHue said...

And you will, of course, notice that, in Weasel Boy's entire original comment above, not one fucking word of condemnation for his religious brother. Not one.

Because I don't know if he's guilty or not. You've already judged him guilty. I do not. And even if he admits guilt or is proven guilty, I still will not condemn him - only his actions. I have no standing to condemn him as I am not God, a judge or a jury.

CC said...

Weasel Boy, being as weaselly as ever, wrote:

I still will not condemn him - only his actions. I have no standing to condemn him as I am not God, a judge or a jury.

Really? Because, if you read your original comment above, you didn't even condemn his actions, did you?

It's truly amazing, isn't it, how someone as saintly and understanding as Weasel Boy can be as intolerant and offensive as he is on his blog.

Go, check it out, just the most recent postings, let's see here -- a report on Bush talking to God is a "liberal media lie"; your humble correspondent is "Canada's Biggest Liar" (pretty funny coming from someone who refuses to correct blatant falsehoods on his blog after I point them out several times); 365gay.com "lies"; Howard Dean is the chairman of the "Democratic Nincompoop Committee"; and on and on and on.

But don't worry, Jinx would never stoop to judge or condemn anyone. After all, he's a Christian and they don't do that sort of thing.

Jesus, what a fucking wanker. Why do I bother?