Sunday, September 30, 2007

Calgary Ward 4: Vote early, vote often.


Gosh, just look at the calendar ... only a couple more weeks until the Calgary municipal election, where all the evidence suggests that white supremacist and NAMBLA advocate Richard Evans is going to get flattened like a toad under a steamroller.

Apparently, though, there's been some recent excitement, during which someone has been wandering around Richard's ward, explaining him to his neighbours, to which commenter "lenny" suggests:

I wouldn’t have failed to mention Ricky’s promotion of pedophilia.

Not surprisingly, Richard uses a novel form of reasoning to dispute lenny's contention:

Now, lenny, you know better ... I merely pointed out the fact that CC passively enables pedophiles and redirected his pseudonym to a pedophile website. It wasn’t a promotion of pedophilia at all but rather the exposing of a disgusting individual for what he really is.

So let's analyze this logically, shall we?

  • Who purchased the domain name canadiancynic.net? Richard Evans.

  • Who currently still owns the domain name? Richard Evans.

  • Who redirected that domain to the home page of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association? Richard Evans.

So, apparently, even though I had absolutely nothing to do with any of the above, the logical conclusion on Richard's planet is that this proves how I am somehow taken with the practices of NAMBLA.

You know, I almost wish Richard would win the contest for his Calgary ward. We would have absolutely guaranteed political entertainment for the next couple of years.

I normally don't take delight in the suffering of others but, in this case, I'd make an exception.

MUST ... RESIST ... WHOOPS, TOO LATE. While I really do have better things to be doing today, I can't help pointing out yet another puddle of hypocrisy that the NAMBLA- and white hood-obsessed Richard Evans is standing in.

As my regular readers are well aware, Dick registered the domain "canadiancynic.net" back in July and, in a move he must have thought was hysterically witty, clever and all-around knee-slappingly hilarious, promptly redirected it to the home page of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. Of such infantile sleaze is the wankersphere comprised.

But, lo and behold, if you click on http://canadiancynic.net today, well, you end up here -- at Dick's right-wing blog home page. Why is that?

Is it because, while Dick is busy fuming and frothing about libel and slander and defamation, he suspects that maybe he crossed the line with that little stunt so he's quietly changed the redirection, hoping no one notices?

Come on, Dick, be a man -- if you're going to do something as childish and classless as that NAMBLA redirect, at least stick with it. Don't be embarrassed; rather, take pride in the depths of the gutter to which you can sink. What the heck -- if I were you, I'd promote that little escapade on your campaign blog. After all, if the residents of Calgary's Ward 4 are going to vote for you, they should at least understand the sort of howling, drooling, bloodthirsty vengeance they might be in for if they ever crossed you.

So let's go, Dick, don't be ashamed of your past. Revel in it. Be proud of it. Fix that redirect, and let the citizens of Calgary know how you deal with critics. Heck, I'll bet that would even raise your standing among Calgary's shrieking wingnut demographic. You might not be a popular man at PTA meetings anymore but, hey, who the fuck cares what those people think? They're probably all commie symps, anyway.

Time to put up or shut up, Dick. Let's see you walk that walk.

43 comments:

Richard said...

...where all the evidence suggests that white supremacist and NAMBLA advocate Richard Evans...

We've been waiting for you to screw up like that. Thanks CC!

thwap said...

Now you've got MPD 'eh Richard/notcycles?

Ti-Guy said...

We've been waiting for you to screw up like that. Thanks CC!

Heh...The retard always does this...you're supposed to believe his network of operatives will soon expose your perfidy to the wider world.

This is how Stormfronters operate. Way to go Evans....I hope you've got your white sheets cleaned and pressed for your victory address.

*snort*...

Had I done this, I would have richly documented his Internet commentary under various troll guises and alliances with people who call themselves "Gamil Gharbi." But since I don't live in Calgary, I cannot not care less.

CanadienCynic said...

Canadian Cynic votes for parties that say it's ok for 60 year olds to have sex with 14 year olds and then Accuses others who want to make that Illegal of supporting it.


Are you stoned CC? Stop doing crack,

CC said...

Richard grunts:

"We've been waiting for you to screw up like that. Thanks CC!"

Uh oh ... I'm guessing Richard suddenly sees a libel suit shining brightly in his future, so for those who want to play along, here are two pop quiz questions:

1) Of Richard Evans or myself, which is the only one of us to ever register a domain and redirect it to a white supremacist site?

2) Of Richard Evans or myself, which is the only one of us to ever register a domain and redirect it to a site advocating pedophilia?

Good luck with that libel suit, Richard. Let me know how it turns out.

Ti-Guy said...

Man, someone needs to whip up more flyers for Ward 4. Although, I suspect NAMBLA-obsessed Richard Evans and his gang of goose-steppers will be more vigilant over next while.

I can't wait to read "novelty candidate Richard Evans" in The Calgary Herald.

Richard said...

That's good guys, keep it up!

Richard said...

Canadian Cynic votes for parties that say it's ok for 60 year olds to have sex with 14 year olds and then Accuses others who want to make that Illegal of supporting it.

That's why CC's little jihad isn't gaining any traction.

Uh oh ... I'm guessing Richard suddenly sees a libel suit shining brightly in his future

Yup! To that end I'm offering $500.00 to the first person to provide me with your name and address so the papers can be served. Hell, I'll even bet that if I got Kinsella on board that he'd drive out to serve the papers himself. I have to admit that I didn't have much to go on before today but you fixed that for me CC. Well done!

Zorpheous said...

Oh Richard,

You don't need to know who CC is to start the law suite against him, CC can be listed as an unknown party, and later the courts can force the issue from Google.

As for your case Richard, it is extremely weak at best, and you would have to answer for all highly questionable blogging in the past. You certainly would not have clean hands going to court.

And there is a catch 22 in this action as well Richard, once you unmask CC, he can turn around and sue you for Defamation because you point sites named similar to his to NAMBLA. It is called Defamation by secondary inference.

Lastly Richard, A defamation case will cost about 70 Thousand to take to court and if you lose, you have to pay for half of CC costs (half the costs according to court schedules).

Dr.Dawg said...

In a case like this, I think all of CC's costs would be awarded.

Gawd, I love to see these screechy right-wingers start to bleat and whine when what goes around finally comes around. Why is candidate Evans so obsessed with NAMBLA and Nazis? Enquiring minds (and voters) want to know.

Ti-Guy said...

Yup! To that end I'm offering $500.00 to the first person to provide me with your name and address so the papers can be served. Hell, I'll even bet that if I got Kinsella on board that he'd drive out to serve the papers himself. I have to admit that I didn't have much to go on before today but you fixed that for me CC. Well done!

*sigh*...He got into the Jack Daniels extra early this morning. I thought his wife had changed the locks on the drinks cupboard.

You know...I'm kind of thinking I'd really like the NAMBLA-obsessed cretin to win. It would be hilarious.

pretty shaved ape said...

canadiencynic aka little johnny can't read and poor dickums, dumb as dirt and half as pretty. you two are a perfect team. a $500 reward for aiding and abetting stalking and invasion of privacy, that's so fuckin' sweet. and since, you know, i'm going to be leaving for scotland in a couple of days i can use some extra spending dough. so here's the address richard, fire up the black helicopters and get ready:
94 bridgeport road east in waterloo, tell'em an ape sent you.

Sheena said...

94 Bridgeport Road, eh?

Got any beer over there? Forgot to do a Brick run earlier today.

Richard said...

You don't need to know who CC is to start the law suite against him, CC can be listed as an unknown party, and later the courts can force the issue from Google.

That'll take too long and my way sounds more fun.

As for your case Richard, it is extremely weak at best,

To the contrary. CC's comments in this post are the perfect example of defamation; Malicious falsehoods spread with the intent of harming a known individual.

And there is a catch 22 in this action as well Richard, once you unmask CC, he can turn around and sue you for Defamation because you point sites named similar to his to NAMBLA. It is called Defamation by secondary inference.

Incorrect again. Said act of defamation has to be against a real person and as CC was anonymous at the time, he wouldn't have a leg to stand on...

Lastly Richard, A defamation case will cost about 70 Thousand to take to court and if you lose, you have to pay for half of CC costs (half the costs according to court schedules).

I'll cover the upfront costs no problem and then have them recovered from CC once he loses.

So what about it CC, where do I send the papers and to whom shall they be addressed?

Ti-Guy said...

That'll take too long and my way sounds more fun.

Good to see NAMBLA-obsessed Richard Evans is admitting to online harassment.

Dr.Dawg said...

CC, I think it's time for another call to the RCMP. Richard is so in violation of Section 264 of the Criminal Code.

Diane Demorney said...

I'm curious to know if Richard realises that some Calgarians from his ward actually read his tripe here... Just sayin'

Ti-Guy said...

Yeesh...offering a bounty...now that's pretty serious. Hope you got that screen-capped, CC.

Richard said...

CC, I think it's time for another call to the RCMP. Richard is so in violation of Section 264 of the Criminal Code.

Yes, please do! Make sure they spell your name correctly on the complaint form...

Richard said...

Yeesh...offering a bounty...now that's pretty serious. Hope you got that screen-capped, CC.

It's not a bounty. It's a reward for providing me with the information I need in order to proceed with a civil suit.

I'm curious to know if Richard realises that some Calgarians from his ward actually read his tripe here... Just sayin'

Well, if they're CC fans, they probably wouldn't be voting for a conservative in the first place... Just sayin'...

Zorpheous said...

"Incorrect again. Said act of defamation has to be against a real person and as CC was anonymous at the time, he wouldn't have a leg to stand on..."

Here is where your problems start Richard. Right here you admit that you you have Defamed CC.

Next, your case is weak because CC is anonymous, and your attempt to discover CC true ID is claim "that'll take too long and my way sounds more fun." Which in the eyes of the court makes your case not about seeking redress for defamation but using the courts to out CC. To which your case is about exposing CC true ID and once that is done comments, actions and posting you made about him in the past now taking on the responsibility of the writers objectives. (it is valid argument in court, doesn't mean the court will buy it.)

Lastly, I do not think you get very much for your case Richard, even if you did win, since the blogging community is pretty much a closed and navel gazing group the damages would be relegated to your on-line en devours. And some how I don't think CC's comments here are going to to actually you cost much, other than increasing your bandwidth and readership.

I suggest you talk to a good lawyer before you actually start this asshattery, a honest lawyer who is more concerned about you than making money from you will inform you that your case is not worth it and it opens you up to all sorts of problems.

Finally,

"Incorrect again. Said act of defamation has to be against a real person and as CC was anonymous at the time, he wouldn't have a leg to stand on..."

So are you saying CC isn't a real person Richard? How are you going sue someone who isn't real? How can someone who isn't real do you damages? "But no your Honour, at the time I defamed CC he wasn't real, so I could damage him but I want to sue him anyways because this non-real persons opinion carry a lot of weight" (sorry if I make light of this Richard, but Lawyers will say this in much more elegant words that will cost you about $350 per hour). Can't have it both ways Richards. The courts are not one way streets.

Anyways, I'm not going to get involved in this blogging spat, CC, Richard, I suggest you both take a freaking chill pill. As for me, I had enough fun when it came to my Anonalogue Experience.

Zorpheous said...

"Well, if they're CC fans, they probably wouldn't be voting for a conservative in the first place... Just sayin'..."

Legal translation, "no damages have been done to Richard Evans your Honour, even Richards Evans admitted to this on September 30, 2007 at 6:13pm"

Oh that sound you just heard was Richard Evans shooting himself in the foot.

Sorry, sorry, I said I wasn't going to get anymore involved in this, but Richard's last comment was just too good to ignore.

Please continue people. I'll just stfu now and eat my popcorn.

Richard said...

egal translation, "no damages have been done to Richard Evans your Honour, even Richards Evans admitted to this on September 30, 2007 at 6:13pm"

Notice how I included the word "fans" in my statement. Further, it doesn't have to be shown that damages have been done, only that the act of defamation was performed. Damages come into play during the consideration of settlement. As for the rest, we'll let the lawyers sort it out...

Stick with diving zorph 'cuz you suck at legal interpretation...

Dr.Dawg said...

Richard, you truly are about the thickest blogospherian I have ever encountered. When you add up your votes on the fingers of one hand, you will see that I'm not alone in my opinion.

Sue on, you poor dweeb. I'm sure CC is shaking in his boots.

Zorpheous said...

Sigh,

Richard, damage has to be demonstrated or proven not have occurred since they are consider during the rewards phase. As you clearly stated,...

"Damages come into play during the consideration of settlement."

Since I do not think any of your fans will think less of you because of what CC writes about you, doesn't do much your case for gaining restitution for damages, and since fans of CC already think you are an asshat, it is a zero sum difference.

"Stick with diving zorph 'cuz you suck at legal interpretation..."

You are absolutely correct here Richard, that is why I have a business lawyer. I also suck at accounting and doing taxes, which is why I have good accountant. Now, if I just get someone to check my writing,...

anyways, that's it, I'm out of this Richard, have fun wasting your time and money. Generally Richard, in these type of cases only the laywers win, but that is just my opinion. Oh, and before you approach Warnen K., you might want to take him off your Moonbat list, you know, just saying ;-)

Cliff said...

Not to worry Bob Hawkesworth will clean his clock.

Red Tory said...

I'm feeling a letter to Bryan Douey coming on...

Paladiea said...

This is funny. CC, if you do have to go to court for this sham of a lawsuit Richard is trying to invent, invite me along. I promise I won't giggle when Richard's lawyer tries to prove his case... too much.

Ti-Guy said...

We'll all go. We'll make a day of it. I'll bring the sandwiches.

Evans is so inept, he'll probably get the death penalty when he loses.

Richard said...

Alright thai-guy, why don't you get the ball rolling by providing us with CC's name and address? Don't let your chicken-shit affliction hold you back...

Niles said...

Uhm, Mr. Evans, is this how you're spending your campaign time? Online trying to intimidate and frag bloggers who don't like your version of domain clone gutter humour?

Gee, I wonder how Bob Hawkesworth is spending his time, other than being the stinky socialist you've proclaimed him and the rest of City council and the other innuendo you've laid down in your cute l'il vid on no-libs.com. I admire how you didn't have the testosterone to put the vid on your official ward 4 blog site. But hey, you just go on ragging at CC and the 'libel' you say s/he is troweling on *you*. Right up to October 15th.

Or did you think a few roadside signage rentals proclaiming you as the "conservative alternative" for Ward 4 would do it for you? I only hope your campaign workers have nothing to do with the pulled up, roughed up, and abandoned Hawkesworth sign I found on the Centre St. boulevard.

A little worse for wear, it's adorning my yard now.

Cliff said...

Mentioned this mess at my blog.

Richard said...

I admire how you didn't have the testosterone to put the vid on your official ward 4 blog site.

Well, you obviously haven't looked at the campaign site as the video's been up there since the 23rd: http://www.calgaryward4.com/?p=37

Gee, I wonder how Bob Hawkesworth is spending his time

His time sure hasn't been spent talking with his constituents. Based on what they tell me, he doesn't return their calls, e-mails or anything else. Maybe he's too bust studying the communist manifesto...

Or did you think a few roadside signage rentals proclaiming you as the "conservative alternative" for Ward 4 would do it for you?

Actually, you'll see 8 more of those signs out tomorrow. In addition to those, there are the brochures, more videos like the one you mentioned above and a press release/day for the next 14 days. Expect to see the profile raise considerably over the next 2 weeks...

Niles said...

I apologize Mr. Evans. You do appear to have the video at your official campaign site off to the side - saying you're not sure if it's over the top and apparently soliciting viewers' reactions while letting it sit there. So, your future videos will be in the same vein you say? Very informative to those who might consider their vote this time around.

What exactly is it you have to offer Calgary and Ward 4, other than calling the incumbent a communist? I wasn't aware McCarthyism was back in style, but whatever suits you...

Richard said...

Is it because, while Dick is busy fuming and frothing about libel and slander and defamation, he suspects that maybe he crossed the line with that little stunt so he's quietly changed the redirection, hoping no one notices?

Had you been paying attention, you would have noticed that the re-direct was pulled a few weeks ago.

Where should we send the papers CC and to whom should they be addressed?

What exactly is it you have to offer Calgary and Ward 4, other than calling the incumbent a communist?

You must have missed the policy page: http://www.calgaryward4.com/?page_id=36

Phyl said...

Even though I've been away from Calgary for 7 years now, I can pretty much guarantee this wingy critter won't be defeating Hawkesworth. Though I agree -- it would be hilarious to watch the endless scandals flowing from him if he did. I'd have to recruit my family in Calgary just to write it all down for me, so I'd have the long record by the time it was all over.

Zorpheous said...

Has Richard changed the redirects to Stormfront as well?

So Richard, I know I said I was going to get involved, but you have to understand that these questions are going to come up in court,... Why did you change the redirects?

Answer honestly and directly, just treat it like you are in court and under oath. Remember Judges and juries don't like long dithering excuses.

Richard said...

Why did you change the redirects?


Because I'm busy with a campaign and can do without the distractions right now. Simple enough for you zorph?

thwap said...

"Because I'm busy with a campaign and can do without the distractions right now."

How do your NAMBLA redirects "distract" you Richard?

Never mind, I'm pretty sure that I don't want to know.

CC said...

No, thwap, you're not getting off that easy. Think like a lawyer -- what would your legalistic response to that be?

Remember, we're pretending that Richard is under oath here, so it's your job to poke logical holes in his story to discredit him in front of the judge.

Come on ... you can do better than that.

thwap said...

Uh, ...

"Wasn't it because you realized that redirecting people looking for 'Canadian Cynic' to NAMBLA was defamatory? Didn't you? You knew it would look bad for your campaign to be seeing defaming a person this way, didn't you??"

"You also knew that these redirects that you, yourself enabled, would reflect badly upon yourself. You KNEW that people would associate YOU with the NAMBLA site. And that's why you changed them. You realized that allegations identical to those made by Mr. Cynic would occur to anyone, ... even your Calgary ward voters, didn't you?"

Phyl said...

Has anybody pointed out all this stuff to the government offices overseeing the election in Calgary?

Or...to the Calgary Herald? Sun? CFCN? City Hall?

the rev. said...

Expect to see the profile raise considerably over the next 2 weeks...
yes, especially when the RCMP frogmarches you off in handcuffs for cyberstalking in full view of the news cameras, but I guess there's no such thing as bad publicity, is there Dicky?