I have received a truckload of utter bullshit and dumbass goddamned fucking stupidity from Patrick's Calgary lawyer (who I am tempted to identify just to embarrass him in front of his peers) and in the midst of all that, Patrick committed unequivocal blatant perjury.
In his Application, Patrick writes:
"Finally, the Defendant's [me, CC] Rule 4.33 Application should be dismissed because the within action is inextricably tied to a 2010 default judgment that the Plaintiff [Patrick] is actively taking steps to set aside; ..."
Patrick is "actively taking steps to set aside" my 2010 defamation judgment against him? That is a howlingly blatant lie for one simple reason.
It was a default judgment and, as anyone with even a smattering of legal knowledge would know, a default judgment cannot be set aside unless it is done in a timely manner. It's been 15+ fucking years since I got my judgment against Patrick, and he has done absolutely sweet goddamned fuck all to "set aside" that judgment, and he is about 15 years too late to do it, anyway.
What Patrick filed is pure perjury, and I have advised my lawyer to treat it as such. And, yes, the August 20 hearing is still on, where you will be able to identify the stupid goddamned lawyer that signed his name to Patrick's perjury.
4 comments:
Twatsy would have been better off hiring Lionel Hutz.
I'll get the popcorn
One would think that puffy pat, with years of experience as a sump pump truck helper, would know that you're supposed to suck the shit out of the hole and not fill it.
I remember you laying out in very great detail what a person has to do if they want to overturn a default judgment and how PR did either none of those things or the exact opposite of what he was supposed to do.
Regardless, for him to be babbling about "actively" trying to do anything about it, ... I laughed out loud.
Post a Comment