Friday, February 29, 2008

On the other hand ...


Shorter Canadian conservatives: "As devout Christians who absolutely and unequivocally believe in an invisible, intangible but infinitely omniscient and omnipotent deity without even the flimsiest bit of supporting evidence to back that up, there's no way we're going to accept these Chuck Cadman accusations without positively ironclad, irrefutable proof."
at

6 comments:

  1. liberal supporter1:03 PM

    Checkmate, Steve.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Red Tory1:30 PM

    Yeah, but... but... that's different!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Seer1:59 PM

    What's different is it's conservatives.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Greg Fingas2:21 PM

    A minor quibble: from what I can tell, there's no amount of proof that's sufficiently ironclad or irrefutable for a Con to admit wrongdoing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Seer3:11 PM

    I believe, Jurist, that's known in the casebooks as Lord Whimsy's Rule.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Seer11:36 AM

    Got it: IAOKIYAR, I mean IAOKIYAC.

    ReplyDelete