Pacheco had the nads to apologize for a tasteless comment. What about you, shithead? Let's recall: "And regarding the name-calling, well, here's a thought, Joanne: If you don't want to be described as an ignorant, hateful, dishonest, homophobic cunt, try not acting like one. It's just a thought, you know." And not a fucking word of apology for that shit.
But somehow, in that flyshit sized brain of yours, a fuck-up who at least had the bag to own up to his crap is worthy of scorn because his apology doesn't measure up to your fucking standards? What a complete and total fuck wad you are!
CC and PSA, From the preponderence of dumbass trolls that seem to be coming by lately to foul the comment threads, your site has clearly made some sort of breakthrough and become a sufficiently large thorn in the side of dumbass conservatives. Well done. Congrats!
Fuck that. Joanne and her "Journey" needed that. Go fuck yourself Anon - Pacheco is a moronic bigot and so is Joanne. Someone has to smack back into shape.
thwap, if you would take your head out of your ass, you would see that the motivations of the individuals in question ( CC, Pacheco ) is immaterial to my point. Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it. The other one, the gutless one, has the nerve to cast ridicule at the first for his less-than-stellar apology, when he himself cannot work up the nads to do likewise for his behaviour.
Nah, too incoherent and stupid. I've already explained it for you, ... figure it out.
Re: The "C" word. I think it's a bit strong. But "CC" used it to make a point about right-wing pseudo-feminists who called "Status of Women Canada" - "SOWs".
I don't agree, but it's not as if he's a holocaust denier like you guys tend to be. Or savage,homophobic closet cases, ... or economic dipshits, ... warmongers, racists, and losers.
Pacheco had the nads to apologize for a tasteless comment. What about you, shithead? Let's recall: "And regarding the name-calling, well, here's a thought, Joanne: If you don't want to be described as an ignorant, hateful, dishonest, homophobic cunt, try not acting like one. It's just a thought, you know." And not a fucking word of apology for that shit.
ReplyDeleteBut somehow, in that flyshit sized brain of yours, a fuck-up who at least had the bag to own up to his crap is worthy of scorn because his apology doesn't measure up to your fucking standards? What a complete and total fuck wad you are!
CC and PSA,
ReplyDeleteFrom the preponderence of dumbass trolls that seem to be coming by lately to foul the comment threads, your site has clearly made some sort of breakthrough and become a sufficiently large thorn in the side of dumbass conservatives. Well done.
Congrats!
Fuck that. Joanne and her "Journey" needed that. Go fuck yourself Anon - Pacheco is a moronic bigot and so is Joanne. Someone has to smack back into shape.
ReplyDeleteNo apologies for that!
"And not a fucking word of apology for that shit."
ReplyDeleteEver notice how your shit is stuff, and everyone else's stuff is shit?
That's George Carlin, btw. You, sir, are about as fresh as a George Carlin punchline.
Oh, and fuck shit ass. Feel better? I know I do.
I'm following the initial commentator's post:
ReplyDeleteCC comes down hard on right-wing asshole for some lame defence of fascism, and he uses profanity.
And he doesn't apologize.
Somebody else tastelessly uses news about another person's battle with breast cancer to speculate and pontificate about her personal life.
And apologizes.
And the initial commentator is a fucking moron.
I hope anonymous no.1 apologises for that rather intemperate and foul-mouthed rant.
ReplyDelete...It was most upsetting.
thwap, if you would take your head out of your ass, you would see that the motivations of the individuals in question ( CC, Pacheco ) is immaterial to my point. Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it. The other one, the gutless one, has the nerve to cast ridicule at the first for his less-than-stellar apology, when he himself cannot work up the nads to do likewise for his behaviour.
ReplyDeleteIs this too subtle for you?
Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?
ReplyDeleteToo subtle for me?
ReplyDeleteNah, too incoherent and stupid. I've already explained it for you, ... figure it out.
Re: The "C" word. I think it's a bit strong. But "CC" used it to make a point about right-wing pseudo-feminists who called "Status of Women Canada" - "SOWs".
I don't agree, but it's not as if he's a holocaust denier like you guys tend to be. Or savage,homophobic closet cases, ... or economic dipshits, ... warmongers, racists, and losers.
Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it.
ReplyDeleteNow that's moral relativism at its finest.
Anonymous 11:37PM, at the risk of coming across as pedantic, I believe "fuckwad" is one word.
ReplyDelete"Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?"
ReplyDeleteOnly if she is one...