The ever-so-predictable Kate McMillan, lovingly quoting yet another right-wing hack (all emphasis added):
Bush's illegal wiretaps on totally innocent US citizens who might be calling Hamas, Hizbollah and Al Qaeda personnel because ... er ... because ... well, it’s illegal, and wrong and against the constitution despite that fact that Bill Clinton did it ...
Details, details. And when all else fails, there's always the 9/11 card to play:
John Hindraker at Powerline sits us all down and calmly explains why it's important during wartime to find out what the enemy is planning, so we can try to stop them, and that in fact it’s completely legal and constitutional, and maybe some people might have forgotten about certain things such as skyscrapers collapsing and the Pentagon erupting in flames.
Yes, by God, you just never know when those treasonous Catholics or vegans are going to bring down another skyscraper, do you? Bastards.
DEAR NEO-CONS: When you've lost Byron York, you've lost the wankersphere:
In the argument that has emerged over warrantless surveillance, there have been a number of overstatements. Some people, for example, have said that Bill Clinton signed an executive order authorizing such surveillance; he did not.
When a regular columnist for the right-wing National Review understands this, it's time for the rest of you to buy a clue as well. Are you paying attention, Kate?
Not mention that the War on Terror is a neverending war, which means that such justifications for wiretaps and other violations of basic freedoms will be ever-present.
ReplyDeleteSeems to me if this is 'justified' now, it was justified after the Oklahioma City bombing, during the Cold War, and so on.
Man, don't get my hopes up like that. I saw "hacktacular" and I jumped to the conclusion her site had been hacked.
ReplyDeleteAh! It's my good friend fred_o1! How've you been buddy?
ReplyDeletewait till the mainstream media picks up on the rest of the death-threat spouting, cyberstalking, nuisance lawsuit threatening, racist, sexist, homophobic Liberal nutcases in the blogsphere...
Well, there aren't any right now, but if you'd like to join the Liberal party there'd be one.
Notice the irony in how, in a thread devoted to condemning illegal internet activity, our special Liberal friend L4L rejoices at and encourages the committing of - yep - illegal internet activity. Silly Liberal! Hahaha!
Special friend? We all you you're a "special friend" I'll bet you are really looking forward to that new Johnny Knoxville movie coming up, unless of course you and your Far right friends decide to launch a lawsuit against it.
No NOOOOOOOOO Don't sue me! Nooooooooooooooooo!
anonalogue writes:
ReplyDeletewait till the mainstream media picks up on the rest of the death-threat spouting, cyberstalking, nuisance lawsuit threatening, racist, sexist, homophobic Liberal nutcases in the blogsphere...
Either pony up some examples, or take your hyper-ventilating elsewhere. My tolerance for open commenting has its limits, and you're getting awfully close to them.
You just wore out your welcome here, A.
ReplyDeleteHey Anon, you wanna have a flame war you just name the time and place. CC can sell tickets.
ReplyDelete