Chronicles of Twatrick: Tick, tock ...

Undischarged bankrupt and aspiring soft core porn author Patrick "You Gonna Eat That?" Ross is rapidly running out of days to decide which way he's going to jump regarding my filed and scheduled (August 20) Rule 4.33 Application to kick his sorry-ass lawsuit to the curb for interminable delay.

If he plans on contesting the application, he must file and serve a proper and legal Response Affidavit that addresses solely the issues related to such an application, and all tendered evidence needs to be sworn into the record and not just scrawled on the back of a place mat from "Cheeseburgers 'R' Us." 

 

  

On the other hand, if he decides to drop the action, every day he delays in doing so represents an increasing "abuse of process" of the legal system in the sense of dragging out an action that you ultimately withdraw shortly before the scheduled hearing -- something that really pisses off the Court. 

 

 

Oh, and if Patrick tries to argue that, darn it, he just couldn't muster the energy to deal with this, then I'll point out that he certainly still has the time to record childish and unwatchable videos for YouTube.

"Your Honour, I'm about to ask you to invest 10 minutes of your life that you will never, ever get back."

Patrick needs to make some very hard decisions, and he needs to make them soon. Tick, tock ...

P.S. It's telling that, after Patrick yammered on about his "extremely-meritorious" lawsuit against me back in early July:

since then, he's gone vewwwy, vewwwy quiet. Trying to ignore this is not going to help Patrick, it's just going to make things much, much worse.

Tick, tock ... 

BONUS TRACK: I draw your attention to one of the non-negotiable requirements of the Response Affidavit that Patrick will have to file to contest my Application:

"Focused Scope: Must be strictly limited to replying to the evidence and arguments raised by the applicant."

That makes it clear that Patrick will absolutely not be allowed to whinge on interminably with one of his rambling grievance fests going back to 2008; he must focus exclusively on the points made in my Affidavit, and my Affidavit is short and specific:

• More than three years have gone by with no advancement of this case by the Plaintiff, and
• There has been no mutual or court-ordered suspension of the litigation that would justify this delay.

That's it -- those are the only points Patrick will be allowed to address, nothing more. He will not be permitted to insist that his lawsuit is "extremely-meritorious," or that he was delayed due to "harassment," or that ... well, you get the idea. Those are the rules and if Patrick tries to play games, it will end very badly for him, indeed.