Tuesday, January 19, 2010

At some point, you have to say ...


... enough is enough.

37 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not I. Scram, you whinging little beast.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Go away, Patrick. And take your child-sodomizing fantasies with you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Twatsy been stalking DAMMIT JANET! lately too.

    We don't approve his blitherings. He got all Twatsy-pantsed about it at his place and slammed us along with you, CC.

    I tell ya, we were honoured to be in the same smear-job as you. :D

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess we can add "stalker" to your list of endearing qualities, Patrick.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm sorry, Patrick ... did you just accuse me of stalking someone's kids? As I've suggested before, I'd appreciate it if you made that accusation in public on your own blog. Please. That would be swell.

    But we both know that's not going to happen, don't we?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yup. A stalker/psychopath, definitely.

    A sane, stable person would have given up long ago.

    ReplyDelete
  11. As I suspected, Patrick has no intention of repeating that libelous little accusation.

    Coward.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Unsurprisingly, Patrick is already backing off his accusation.

    Coward.

    ReplyDelete
  14. He never likes to back up any of his yippage and he'll never come straight at you. Of course, he whines "It's So Hard to Get Answers From Them" when others don't play his games the way he wants...
    It's disheartening, really.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Patrick is the master of the weaselly avoidance. He'll show up here and accuse me of "stalking." When I challenge him to make that same accusation publicly at his own blog, suddenly it becomes, "He conspired to encourage other people to promote ... blah blah blah."

    Patrick knows what the challenge is. He's just playing dumb and thinks nobody notices. He's the worst kind of coward.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yeah, I think i was there for all that...
    Somehow I don't recall this 'conspiracy theory' thing...
    Is it just a sign of the addleminded--as they progress in their tirades against societal conventions they eventually start seeing conspiracies behind every corner??

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Clean-up in Aisle 7. But take a screenshot.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Not to be suspicious, Sparky, but are you the real Sparky or Patrick Ross impersonating Sparky, as he's done before? You know, when he masquerades as someone else and writes racist crap to smear them on the Internet.

    He's done that, you know.

    ReplyDelete
  20. fuck you and wanda, twats, you corpulent phoney.

    KEvron

    ReplyDelete
  21. And precisely as I predicted, Patrick back-pedals frantically from his original accusation and is now waffling and weaseling all over the place. What else is new?

    Everyone is laughing at you, Patrick. Why not just cut your losses and move on?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yeah, it's me--the guy that Patrick impersonated and posted racist crap as.
    And he has the gall to bitch about other people's sock puppets.
    I think I'll just create an account--
    Patrick 'I enable NAMBLA supporters' Ross

    See, I have screen caps in which Patrick states his undying admiration and devotion for one Richard Evans and what he did, so I wouldn't even be posting lies...
    But I won't fall down to Patricks level of whatever he thinks he's doing...

    ReplyDelete
  23. twats has a level?!

    KEvron

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I clicked on Twatsy's link there. (I assume you're going to delete the post.)

    BREAKING! He lies.

    He says you've turned on comment moderation, when clearly, you haven't.

    Now, we at DJ! do have comment moderation turned on.

    So, sue us.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yeesh, I meant 'delete the comment'.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Don't feed the Twatsy, kids.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think you should put moderation on for while.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Don't feed the Twatsy, kids.
    not here or anywhere now...

    ReplyDelete
  30. "Don't feed the Twatsy, kids."

    oh, you're one to talk.

    KEvron

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes, Ti-Guy, I believe it's time for comment moderation since I have to head out shortly. And I really don't want Patrick stopping by, leaving more comments related to his creepy obsession with infant sodomy. That's just ... creepy.

    ReplyDelete
  32. while i believe everything u've written cc, i've hardly wasted any of my time following the apparent antics of Mr. Ross.

    that being said, it's rather hard to follow the argument?/debate? when all of Mr. Ross' posts have been deleted.

    is there somewhere else where the entirety of this saga is posted(so I - and others - can catch up?)

    ReplyDelete
  33. is there somewhere else where the entirety of this saga is posted(so I - and others - can catch up?)

    You first. Why were you kicked off Blogging Tories?

    ReplyDelete
  34. BB:

    I delete Patrick's comments because that's been my policy for quite some time, given his creepy habit of stalking people on the Internet and threatening them with physical violence (as he did with me a few years ago).

    Regarding this latest episode, you're free to contact Patrick directly and ask him whatever you want about his disturbing obsession with infant sodomy and graphic descriptions thereof, knowing that he will, of course, lie about it. But, as I wrote earlier, he knows exactly what I'm talking about.

    I asked Patrick numerous times to piss off and stop polluting my site, and he's refused. So now he can explain his public comments elsewhere describing the anal violation of infants to anyone who's interested. I will continue to delete his comments here so, if you want to know more, ask Patrick.

    ReplyDelete
  35. not a chance, cc. there are some cesspools i simply will not enter.

    in this case then, i'll take a pass on the drama.

    with blogspot can not simply ban him?(ip, user name etc)?

    ReplyDelete
  36. oh.. tiguy regarding your question.. if you read my blog and use the two brain cells that God in his infinite mercy gave you, you might, just might be able to figure out why.

    ReplyDelete
  37. BB:

    I'm looking into that, but even banning by IP or user name won't solve the Patrick problem, as he's recently developed an ugly habit of registering under other commenter names (including impersonating well-established commenters) to smear those people by posting racist comments.

    In a recent example, he was caught commenting as "Anonymous" before the blog owner recognized who it was and gave him the boot and deleted his comments.

    What's puzzling is that I never comment at his dump, and I've simply asked him (over and over and over) to extend to me the same courtesy. Instead, he continues to show up here, most recently to leave a comment whose subject was (as I've already mentioned) doing appalling things to a two-year-old.

    And, finally, regardless of who thinks it's childish, I will no longer link to any progressive blogger who allows Patrick commenting privileges at their site. If those people choose to pal around with someone who posts disgusting comments about sexually assaulting infants, they don't need any traffic from me.

    ReplyDelete