"apparently I am controversial for linking to your site, or something like that."
No, Sean, you are not controversial for where you link. You're controversial for refusing to be a member of the Kate M. panty-sniffing horde, and for reporting on what she actually said. And wrote.
And now, you must be destroyed. Or hadn't you noticed?
Congrats.
ReplyDeleteNew York, please.
Can I have a raise now? And I'd like mine to be lemon.
ReplyDeleteDid somebody say cheesecake? Woohoo!!
ReplyDeleteCheesecake in what sense? Oh, never mind, sign me up for either one...
ReplyDeleteapparently I am controversial for linking to your site, or something like that.
ReplyDeleteavec des bleuets, s'il vous plait.
ReplyDeleteCongrats!
ReplyDeleteAnything involving chocalte. And maybe black cherries.
Woot! Champagne at my place for the Cynics!
ReplyDeleteBravo, my dears, and might I say, no one deserves it more!
Sean in Saskatchewan writes:
ReplyDelete"apparently I am controversial for linking to your site, or something like that."
No, Sean, you are not controversial for where you link. You're controversial for refusing to be a member of the Kate M. panty-sniffing horde, and for reporting on what she actually said. And wrote.
And now, you must be destroyed. Or hadn't you noticed?
Aww, c'mon CC, at least 100,000 of those hits are Patsy Ross and Dick Evans checking again and again and again for validation.
ReplyDelete