I don’t think you’re going to win any points by drawing this comparison. It’s a strained one at best, inappropriate on many levels, and may even be regarded by some as a further insult to St. Watkins.
It’s bad enough that moronic wingnuts keep reviving that particular dead horse for their own self-serving purposes, I really don’t see the point in CC doing it for his.
A propos of nothing, were any of our favourite Blogging Tories in Calgary yesterday?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI don’t think you’re going to win any points by drawing this comparison. It’s a strained one at best, inappropriate on many levels, and may even be regarded by some as a further insult to St. Watkins.
ReplyDeleteOMG teh incivility!
ReplyDeleteand may even be regarded by some as a further insult to St. Watkins.
ReplyDeleteBy Blogger Red Tory, at 5:17 PM
Oh? Good.
It’s bad enough that moronic wingnuts keep reviving that particular dead horse for their own self-serving purposes, I really don’t see the point in CC doing it for his.
ReplyDeleteRed, they'd revive it anyway, and at the least opportune moment. That's what makes them wingnuts.
ReplyDeleteIf I had a blog and had been subjected to wingnut pogrom, I'd paste the issue all over my blog and wear it like scarlet letter.
I guess. Personally, I subscribe the "two wrongs don't make a right" theory, although I've been known to make exceptions from time to time.
ReplyDelete