Oh, dear God, this could be amusing. Recall, if you will, the apparently bogus e-mail to Warren Kinsella:
Re: The Good Fight
From: Eitan (eitan@terleski7.com)
Sent:February 10, 2008 1:37:15 PM
To: wkinsella@hotmail.com
So who (or what) is "terleski7.com"? A simple "whois" shows:
...
Registration Service Provided By: SIBERNAME.COM
Contact: +1.8006138915
Domain Name: TERLESKI7.COM
Registrant:
Sibername.com
Privacy Service (richard@no-libs.com)
275 Slater Street, Suite 900
Ottawa
ON,K1P 5H9
CA
Tel. +403.3337035
Fax. +866.6801880
...
Oh, my ... it's none other than our NAMBLA-obsessed friend and failed Calgary alderman Richard Evans. Oh, please, someone pick this up and run with it. Please, please, please.
BONUS TRACK: Warren notices that a number of the usual wingnut suspects are actually not impressed with this bit of douchebaggery. I'm guessing that moment of lucidity will pass quickly enough.
DOUBLE BONUS: I would have pointed out the above to Warren, but his contact mechanism requires cookies to be enabled and I'm not allowing cookies from someone's site just to send them e-mail. Fuck that. If someone else wants to bring this to his attention, feel free.
WELL, I GUESS THAT WASN'T SURPRISING: Calgary blogger Richard Evans, he of the fondness for white supremacy and NAMBLA, fesses up that, yes indeed, that was him making knee-slapping light of the Holocaust after all.
Personally, I'd never have come to this conclusion myself, but I guess there really is something hilarious about millions of dead Jews. Just ask Kate or Richard.
What is Richard doing registering Merle Teleski's (who Ezra Levant's suing) campaign site? And why is KKKate in contact with Richard...exchanging license numbers and God knows what else? And does Mrs. No-Libs know about this? And does Halls of Cacademia get to watch?
ReplyDeleteWhat an incestuous little nest of arachnids. Someone get the RAID.
Strange ... that address belongs to this company:
ReplyDeleteLes Systèmes SOLITEK Systems Inc.
275 Slater St. Suite 900
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H9
Tel: (613) 234-1421
Fax: (613) 234-2136
Which is about 4 blocks away from my office. Maybe I should take a walk in that direction this afternoon? Except it's -16 (-27 with the windchill) outside. I'm not sure I'm willing to freeze my booty off for this.
What is Richard doing registering Merle Teleski's (who Ezra Levant's suing) campaign site?
ReplyDeleteMore importantly, why is Richard passing himelf off as Merle Teleski in emails to Warren Kinsella. Isn't that called identity theft and isn't it a crime.
Careful, Robert ... I'm willing to believe that Richard was simply the person who helped set up the domain terleski7.com (and what a crappy piece of design that is).
ReplyDeleteBeyond that, though, I don't think I'd make any further assumptions, other than that it's an amusing bit of wankerrific incest.
Interesting to see the some more information about internet slobbering ubertroll Fred Bracken...Yes indeed, that's a fine bunch of followers KKKate has there. I'll just bet with a looming election, it would be terrible if their connections to the Conservative government and the CPC were widely publicized.
ReplyDeleteRight Monte and Stephen?
What was the point? Low blow, full thumbs down.
ReplyDeleteEvans has confirmed, on his own blog, that it was him.
ReplyDeleteWhile feeling the rapture of sick twisted humour, an ideolog plays a prank on an ideolog.
ReplyDeleteKinsella's not an ideologue...he's an operative.
ReplyDeleteWell, now we know that sexually abused children and Holocaust dead are gut-busting cannon fodder for Richard Evans's mockery of liberals.
I seriously don't get these people. They object to swearing, and then engage in this kind of stuff?
Easy on the broad strokes there, CC. All the voices of reason on the BT-o-sphere have expressed displeasure.
ReplyDeleteSorry Raphael, but these sickening, morally depraved fuckwits are welcomed and embraced by "Teh Blogging Tories" on a regular basis... (at best, they will turn a blind eye). More often, they're enthusiastically lofted as champions and heroes of the so-called "conservative" cause. The old axiom of lying down with dogs and sleeping with fleas can't be suspended in this case. These are the people you choose to associate with. Playing both sides against the middle is all well and good, but the routine grows tiresome after a while.
ReplyDeleteRaphael:
ReplyDeleteFeel free to point out where I made that generalization. In fact, I even gave Richard Evans the benefit of the doubt until he confirmed his participation personally. So let's not wander in here being all sanctimonious, shall we?
Besides, given the typical behaviour of the Blogging Tories, that kind of generalization wouldn't even be over the top, would it?
I just don't think your articles have attempted to convey the division in the BTs over this, in particular a half dozen articles protesting it.
ReplyDeleteA whole half-dozen? My, my ... let the shunning of KKKate begin.
ReplyDeleteConsidering the majority of those "protesting" do it in a "heh, heh - bad form, Kate, but Kinsella was clearly asking for it" manner, I'm hardly impressed with the BT's policing their own.
RA: How about one division kicking a few of the cretins out? I know I wouldn't be caught dead associated with a lot those bloggers.
ReplyDeleteI realise some of you differ with each other and...dissent...I suppose you could call it, to simulate the forms of vigorous and vibrant discussion (which conveniently avoids having to do the hard work involved in an informed discussion over matters of real substance), but I'm pretty sure the jury's in on what is considered very poor taste.
I just don't think your articles have attempted to convey the division in the BTs over this, in particular a half dozen articles protesting it.
Hey, son...there's your next post! I think the BT's would be greatly improved by a little self-examination and criticism.
Raphael writes:
ReplyDelete"I just don't think your articles have attempted to convey the division in the BTs over this, in particular a half dozen articles protesting it."
You're right, Raph -- it would be much more honest to summarize the general critical BT reaction along the lines of, "Bad Kate, sort of tasteless and mean-spirited. Although, of course, we defend to the death her right to say it."
And here's an exercise for you, Raph -- why don't you go back through the weeks of right-wing reaction to my Wanda Watkins post, and slog your way through the threats, the vilification, the promises of legal action and tracking me down so someone could deal with me, and see if you can pick out the whingers who staunchly defended my right to free speech.
Whaddya say, Raph? You up for that? Don't you think the contrast would be amusing?
Jeezus, Raphael, do you even, for a second, listen to yourself?
I don't think anyone wanted to censor your right to tell a mother to fuck her grief. We just didn't think it was in good taste. And it wasn't.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, you scored some retribution when Neo recently told that black mother to fuck her grief as well.
So your answer to CC's request is no, I take it? That's what I thought.
ReplyDeleteFrom SDA comments, Conservative dissent is rampant:
ReplyDeleteA few interesting points in reading these comments...
1) I actually agree with Jason Cherniak on something... scary.
2) When people have accused us on the right of being red-neck buffons, I've always given my fellow conservatives the benefit of the doubt. Now... I'm not so sure my trust has been well placed.
3) It's a real shame to see how many hateful and insulting comments have been left here by so-caled "conservatives", instead of talking about the real issues at hand.
4) It looks like a large number of my fellow "conservatives" need to grow up...
Posted by: Christian Conservative at February 11, 2008 1:31 PM
That can't be the first time he's noticed it. Dawg's Blawg has a good record of when KKKate goes full-out Kristallnacht, and I don't remember seeing Christian Conservative dissenting. Maybe native people and Muslims don't count.
ReplyDeleteThere are no degrees of racism and bigotry. If you're bigoted in one fashion, you're bigoted in them all.
Well said Ti-Guy. Bigotry and racism are not partisan issues. They are human issues.
ReplyDeleteYou take one comment out of 264 (and rising) and claim that Conservative dissent is rampant? Nice try, RA.
ReplyDeleteI read the other 263 and they run the gamut from "Kate you are teh Bomb" to "Kate, you totally pwned WK" with a few spittle-flecked "Kate, can I hump your leather-clad legs" thrown in. There's also about 15-20 comments from the same 3 or 4 people calling her on it. Yes indeed, it's a wonder KKKate can control the dissent.
"Kate, can I hump your leather-clad legs"
ReplyDeleteEwps...Sorry, that was me.
...Kidding. Anyway, recent photos of KKKate prove, as it did with Coulter and Marsden, that hate ages the skin prematurely.
It's a scientific fact. You can look it up.
I don't think anyone wanted to censor your right to tell a mother to fuck her grief. We just didn't think it was in good taste. And it wasn't.
ReplyDeleteOkay, I’ll take issue with this particular turd dropping, for rather obvious reasons.
Raphael… not being a complete fucking nitwit, surely you must be capable of differentiating between censorship, which by nature is an authoritarian means that seeks to prevent information from being disseminated in the first instance, and post facto vilification and denunciation by those who feel that a thuggish form of suppression trumps any pretense of free speech.
To claim, quite laughably, that “We just didn’t think it was in good taste” is… well, you know I’m kind of stumped to come up with an adequately descriptive term here… It’s just beyond all sentient belief. Time after time after time after time I, along with others, stated quite reasonably, in no uncertain terms, that the remark in question was indisputably in poor taste, that it was “intemperate” (to put it in the polite vernacular of standardized apologia), and yet… NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!!
Of course not. Because for batshit crazy band of catastrophically dense fuckwits that comprise the steaming pile of intellectual sewage known as the “Blogging Tories” no explanation of any sort would suffice. Never mind that it could be argued that St. Watkins was making a highly tendentious (and I would argue contemptible) call at the behest of right-wing war-mongers and dopey “support the troops” cheerleaders for unlimited sacrifice in perpetuity to justify the loss of her son. Never mind that she was being crassly exploited for self-serving political gain…
Good taste? Get a fucking clue. And buy a moral compass while you’re at it.
Not good enough for Neo. What, you're basing all of this on Neo's obsession with CC [and the mutual love]?
ReplyDeleteNobody has a patent on crass self-serving political gain, and Jack Layton is easily leading the pack in that sense, so get off the high horse.
Raphael writes:
ReplyDelete"I don't think anyone wanted to censor your right to tell a mother to fuck her grief. "
You're kidding, right, Raph? Do I really need to go back and drag out the numerous comments from people threatening me with physical violence, legal action, and so on?
And the examples you post above don't exactly represent unbridled outrage, do they? More like an awkward discomfort is what I'd say. I doubt you're going to have much luck drawing an analogy here.
Well, cc, while you're busy building that pyre for the BT's, all I can say is that I don't endorse what Kate did, and I think she acted in complete disregard for human decency and respect. Her blog represents what I believe to be the worst example of information manipulation, and her recent Vietnam revisionist nonsense is an example. So really, keep your rhetoric to Kate and her fans.
ReplyDeleteWarren gets busted using an image for his own political gain and you mental midgets blame Kate and I? Well, at least you're consistent...
ReplyDeleteFuck off, you NAMBLA-obsessed retard.
ReplyDeleteGolly, Richard, from your playful summary of this incident, one would hardly guess that it involved making light of the murder of millions of Jews.
ReplyDeleteI guess that's the kind of detail one has to tease out from following the links and doing some actual reading. It's a good thing I'm here to help the process along, isn't it?
Oh, and since it bears saying because free speech warriors are such morons, this wouldn't be something a human rights commission should deal with.
ReplyDeleteBusted? His own gain? What the fuck drugs are you on you mental midget? The image was used in good faith, good faith that you and your pathetic band of cretins spit on and used as a bully would use it.
ReplyDeleteAnd in the end, thats all you people are, Richard. Bullies. Scum sucking wasteland bullies that have nothing of their own, no creativity, nothing original, just their petty mouth-breathing humour.
Well, Richard, you can go fuck yourself very much and take your worthless sense of humour somewhere where it will be appreciated, like the local Aryan Nation meeting.
Golly, Richard, from your playful summary of this incident, one would hardly guess that it involved making light of the murder of millions of Jews.
ReplyDeleteCan you show the group just exactly where millions of Jews were made fun of? Provide links you miscreant. The only one to mention Jews was Kinsella...
Are you this dense all the time, Richard? Oh wait, you're a conservative, yes you are.
ReplyDeleteReferences to the Holocaust by means of tattoos on one's arms implicitly directs everything you've done back on the Jews and ends up belittling the tragedy and horror that they went through, not to mention what the tattoo means to survivors.
Of course, in order to understand that you would have to have an ounce of empathy. Unfortunately it is too easy to see that you're just another sociopathic prick with little feeling for others rather than your own ego providing a feeling of superiority.
You're argument is just too, too precious for words, Dick. You set Kinsella up with a joke based on the Holocaust. I guess the only thing funnier than child molestation (NAMBLA anyone?) in your tiny little mind is genocide.
ReplyDeleteReferences to the Holocaust by means of tattoos on one's arms implicitly directs everything you've done back on the Jews and ends up belittling the tragedy and horror that they went through, not to mention what the tattoo means to survivors.
ReplyDeleteThose are some pretty impressive mental gymnastics. Are you saying that everyone with a tattoo on their arm is a Jew? You make the same baseless assumptions that Kinsella did. I once let a girl write her phone number on my arm. Was that "making fun of the Jews"?
Not so much...
You idiots can piss and moan all you want but the facts are simple;
1. There was nothing in the e-mail to Warren that indicated that the sender was a survivor.
2. Warren made that assumption all on his own.
3. Warren didn't vet the photo. If CC "The Super Sleuth" could figure out that it was my e-mail addy, then Kinsella could have done the same. God knows they're both on the same intellectual level...
No more, no less...
Sucks to be Warren. Sucks to be you trying to defend him...
You're argument is just too, too precious for words, Dick. You set Kinsella up with a joke based on the Holocaust.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't a joke you twit it was a trap.
Why does it suck? The response to your little "joke" has been overwhelmingly in our favor and the support that you've built up for Kinsella shows that you're the one in the hot seat, not me. I'm just a little pissed off commenter on a liberal blog. None of this hurts me or my reputation, but for you? You might even run afoul of the law for this one. I'm pretty sure at that point that even the minute support that you're receiving from the right will dry up and you'll be left all alone trying to cry "freedom of speech" and "it was just a joke!".
ReplyDeleteWhile little ol' me will just sit back with some popcorn to watch the show with the rest of these guys that know what you did. We get to watch you squirm trying to justify it in any way possible, what could be better?
But don't you dare apologize, that would ruin the moment.
Oh Richard, what did your little "trap" prove? That you can take advantage of good hearted people?
ReplyDeleteDo you know how pathetic that appears? Do you understand how contemptuous it is? No? Neither would any other sociopath.
It wasn't a joke you twit it was a trap.
ReplyDelete*yawn* How terribly uncivil of you, Dick.
It wasn't a joke you twit it was a trap.
ReplyDeleteLike a black, windowless van filled with puppies and candy parked outside an elementary school, eh, Richard?
God, you're...disturbed.
richard:
ReplyDeleteNor was there anything in the email to indicate that the sender was actually you, and the numbers on the arm were actually KKKate's motorcycle #s (WTF? Creepy!!).
The email and the subsequent emails you sent were fraudulent. They were intended to mislead and did mislead, with precisely the desired result of the sender.
No more, no less.
While little ol' me will just sit back with some popcorn to watch the show with the rest of these guys that know what you did. We get to watch you squirm trying to justify it in any way possible, what could be better?
ReplyDeleteBut don't you dare apologize, that would ruin the moment.
I'm not squirming and there's no way in hell that I'll apologize. You may not understand it yet but I don't give a flying fig what you and your little buddies think...
Richard, of course you care, or you wouldn't be here. It's Kate who doesn't care, and she's long since moved on from this little project. But you? You can't get enough.
ReplyDeletefunny rickie, for someone that isn't squirming and couldn't give a fig, you sure showed up here to wriggle and preen in a hurry. you're a fuck head rickie, no more, no less. my condolences to your wife, must suck waking up next to a creep like you every day.
ReplyDeletePSA, Dickie called me a "twit" ... don't you think that was meeeeeaaaannn of him?
ReplyDeleteYeah, me neither.
It wasn't a joke you twit it was a trap.
ReplyDeleteSo you admit that you set out to trap Kinsella, Dick. Now where have I heard that before? Oh, I remember now.
Your average conservative right-wing bloggers ... putting the "hip" back in "hypocritical".
It isn't my reputation that is taking the hits there Dickie. The baggage from this will be hung around your neck like the proverbial albatross for years to come.
ReplyDeleteThe really bad thing about a loss of reputation? It rarely comes back. You're just about to become obscure, your "friends" on the right-wing blogosphere will suddenly have better things to do than read your blog or link to it.
And all because of a little "trap" that was so insensitive and so juvenile that Raphael has chastised you for it.
You know, if Neo turns his back on you as well your downfall will basically be complete.
Good job, Richard, you've set us up with comedic material at your expense for a LONG time.
OK, folks, let's stop feeding the Richard troll, shall we? At the moment, Dick is heavily into what we call "whistling past the graveyard."
ReplyDeleteHe's well aware of just how badly he fucked up here, but he's desperately trying to put on a brave face as if he doesn't care. Instead, the very fact that he's here, churning out one comment after another defending himself, makes it obvious that he knows the hole he's dug for himself.
One can almost feel sorry for Richard -- the NAMBLA obsession, the Stormfront habit, and now making fun of dead Jews. I don't think Richard's going to live this down for a while.
heh. you know what dickkk said on kkkate's blog? "don't feed the trolls"! the fucking nerve....
ReplyDeleteKEvron
I have to agree - I think he'll be wearing this for quite some time. And let me be the first to say that it looks outstanding on you, Dickie.
ReplyDeleteRichard, of course you care, or you wouldn't be here. It's Kate who doesn't care, and she's long since moved on from this little project. But you? You can't get enough.
ReplyDeleteOk, I'll admit, your fake moral outrage is amusing...
My thoughts are with Corrine Evans and the wee bairns...
ReplyDeleteHe's already emailed me, suggesting it was all his idea. That tells me she's actually experiencing some recriminations over this, even in her own demi-monde. So she's encouraged him to take the rap, perhaps.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with that theory is that a lunatic in Alberta can't reasaonably be expected to know what is on the bottom of another lunatic's motorcycle unless the former send same to the latter.
W
He's already emailed me, suggesting it was all his idea. That tells me she's actually experiencing some recriminations over this, even in her own demi-monde. So she's encouraged him to take the rap, perhaps.
ReplyDeleteCare to back that up Warren? I've sent no such e-mails... At this point I have to call you a damned liar...
Instead of calling him a liar, why don't you threaten Warren with a lawsuit, Richard? That's always worked for you in the past. I remember you throwing lawsuit threats around like they were links to Stormfront only last summer. How are those going, anyhow? Churning their way through the courts, or what?
ReplyDeleteI think I get the joke now, though -- it's just like when you redirected canadiancynic.net to NAMBLA. The joke is, it's all in your own head and we're all supposed to stand by, mystified at why anyone would embarrass himself like that.
Ha, ha! You're priceless.
After reading the entire thread over at Kate's place, and Warren's Musing on the matter I almost have some deep regrets about a few of the photoshops I have done of late, namely the one yesterday where I compared both Kinsella and Ezra to a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich.
ReplyDeleteYet the one photoshop I regret the most is when I photoshopped Richard Evans as a Cockroach after he lost a hard fought race last November.
I like to apologize, unconditionally and with out reservation. I truly regret comparing Richard Evans to a Cockroach, it was callous, uncalled for and defamatory to the cockroaches of the world. To my little bug friends, I am truly sorry for the defamation to your character.
Zorpheous
Care to back that up Warren? I've sent no such e-mails... At this point I have to call you a damned liar...
ReplyDeleteHey, maybe it's another 'prank' or 'trap', and you're ok with pranks and traps now aren't you?
"It wasn't a joke you twit it was a trap."
ReplyDeleteoh! the mileage i'm gonna get outta that one!
KEvron
i received an email from one "richard evans", in which he propositioned me to be his fuck buddy.
ReplyDeletecoulda been a prank. or maybe even a trap....
KEvron
ps, i holding out for the steak dinner, dickkk.
And in case anyone missed it, because people need to know this, Kate has a motorcycle.
ReplyDeleteohmygodsheissocool.