Wednesday, June 21, 2006

I wouldn't line my cat litter box with "Macleans."


As a brief addendum to the earlier post on dumbass Adam Daifallah, let it be known that any magazine that puts a piece of crap like this into print will never see the inside of CC HQ.

Besides, the National Post is far more absorbent.
at

6 comments:

  1. Zorpheous10:29 PM

    I disagree, the Toronto Sun is way more absorbant ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cathie from Canada12:12 AM

    I knew there was a good reason I don't bother with Macleans anymore -- Mark Steyn? Pffttt!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Somena Woman4:22 AM

    "Besides, the National Post is far more absorbent." And often Free! to boot! --

    Nope, nothing to worry about in dem circulation figures... nuthin at all, sez I.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:32 AM

    Macleans has about one or two gems an issue. But even the few good articles make me want to claw my eyes out.

    Ugliest. Format. Ever.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mike12:24 PM

    I can't believe since Macleans has gone so far downhill in the last few years (or maybe I just notice more now). I recall hearing something about new ownership, is this true?
    I remember a long article a couple summers back about how Wal-mart was actually pretty nice. That pretty much sealed it for me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:44 PM

    Mike - Indeed. I don't remember Macleans being this... awful... before. And Mark Steyn? Wtf?

    ReplyDelete