tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post8338888580374720400..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: Yeah, that libel suit is looking better by the minute.CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-8831115998190389182009-06-16T01:24:52.122-04:002009-06-16T01:24:52.122-04:00I don't understand how people can lack that de...I don't understand how people can lack that degree of self-awareness. Outing someone's home address because he called you mean names? Do they realize how that looks? Maybe they do. If so, what does that mean?NĂ¡mo Mandoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04876501353961485728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-83446218960885926722009-06-15T23:58:38.343-04:002009-06-15T23:58:38.343-04:00To be perfectly accurate, I think it's arbitra...To be perfectly accurate, I think it's arbitrary whether I claim that Dick "supports" NAMBLA or that he "promotes" NAMBLA. Certainly, there is no dispute whatsoever about the latter, given that:<br /><br />1) Dick knew my web site got a fair amount of traffic,<br /><br />2) Dick classlessly registered the lookalike domain "canadiancynic.net" to take advantage of the inevitable confusion,<br /><br />3) Dick redirected that latter link to NAMBLA.<br /><br />In short, Dick took explicit and deliberate actions to drive unsuspecting readers to NAMBLA's home page and increase their traffic. That is the very definition of "promotion."CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-19196127408815678622009-06-15T23:50:10.975-04:002009-06-15T23:50:10.975-04:00you pretend he's actually a NAMBLA supporter
...<i>you pretend he's actually a NAMBLA supporter</i><br /><br />To be fair, CC never said what Richard claims he said, but Richard <b>did</b> direct web traffic to NAMBLA.<br /><br />Richard once threatened me with a lawsuit for saying he supported NAMBLA, too. Still waiting on that one -- I'm sure it's coming. Yup. Any minute now.M@https://www.blogger.com/profile/13408488215496128814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-7716998673652516742009-06-15T21:28:47.318-04:002009-06-15T21:28:47.318-04:00"... is completely true ..."
Does that ...<i>"... is completely true ..."</i><br /><br />Does that mean really, really, for real, really true?<br /><br />Only fuckheads* need to reduntantly emphasize what is supposed to be indisputable.<br /><br />*You know who. Fuckheads!mikmikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00366766734839522162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-41566594150214421582009-06-15T21:26:25.102-04:002009-06-15T21:26:25.102-04:00Just asking because it's not very interesting....<i>Just asking because it's not very interesting.</i><br /><br />Don't be disingenous, Balbulican. You do find this stuff interesting...you're just hoping for a new development. I think Jay Currie's involvement in this would be along those lines.<br /><br />Anyway, I think Dickie got all confused at one point when he was accusing everyone of paedophilia when discussing age of consent with anyone who was questioning the incoherence of Conservatives considering 14 year-olds responsible enough to be tried as adults but <i>not</i> responsible enough to have sex, even with people their own age. I seem to remember he'd mischaracterise that as approving of age-inappropriate sexual relationships and accused anyone of not responding to that lunatic proposition of agreeing with it. That's pretty much what Dickie does in <i>every</i> discussion. Puts words in your mouth and asserts agreement if you address it.<br /><br />The man is real piece of work. Oh, and no surprise <i>Free Dominion</i> has accommodated the <i>libel</i>. In for a penny, in for a pound.<br /><br />Email Connie and alert to it.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-67110696839836395372009-06-15T21:18:42.192-04:002009-06-15T21:18:42.192-04:00I think Ti-Guy has it right when he posted this ab...I think Ti-Guy has it right when he posted this about Richard Evans of Calgary:<br /><i>You're a vile, NAMBLA-obsessed, pornography-posting degenerate. The only thing your children have been exposed to is criminally irresponsible parenting.</i><br /><br />I'd add extremely stupid but that goes without saying...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-36290923096588040772009-06-15T21:18:04.353-04:002009-06-15T21:18:04.353-04:00Balby:
I haven't filed any suits so far, and ...Balby:<br /><br />I haven't filed <i>any</i> suits so far, and I was quite prepared to just ignore all this bullshit and get back to work and blogging.<br /><br />But this constant ratcheting up of the accusations is starting to get annoying. And, really, there comes a time when you <i>can't</i> let it pass anymore.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-86211377783510837422009-06-15T21:12:39.308-04:002009-06-15T21:12:39.308-04:00Quick question...how long do you expect this curre...Quick question...how long do you expect this current round of fake indignation and barely veiled libel threats to continue? You know, the bit where Richard pretends to be about to sue you, and you pretend he's actually a NAMBLA supporter, and Patrick and you try to imply you've launched libel suits without actually saying so because neither of you will...<br /><br />Just asking because it's not very interesting.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.com