tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post8019244855661208203..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: It's all about the gays, isn't it?CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-42081625843625271292009-07-15T20:00:25.980-04:002009-07-15T20:00:25.980-04:00Doesn't anyone think that one of the real prob...Doesn't anyone think that one of the real problems here is that a Roman Catholic priest apparently wasn't aware that the PM isn't Catholic?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12343672288016773822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-53647506900386461682009-07-11T10:32:36.328-04:002009-07-11T10:32:36.328-04:00Adam, look at the gut on the carcass that is Steph...Adam, look at the gut on the carcass that is Stephen Harper. You don't think he could fit another case of communion wafers in there? Heck, he'd still have enough room for a couple of cans of Pepsi.Jon Pertweehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15885012077740645175noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-4505357180710798942009-07-09T16:24:18.431-04:002009-07-09T16:24:18.431-04:00How thin was the wafer? Wafer-thin? Perhaps he w...How thin was the wafer? Wafer-thin? Perhaps he was full.Adam Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09643814038940593559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-53188359399440084732009-07-09T13:11:22.651-04:002009-07-09T13:11:22.651-04:00In fairness, CC, we don't know that they would...In fairness, CC, we don't <i>know</i> that they would have been shrieking up and down the hall if Ignatieff, May, or Layton had done it. We suspect they would, and given past behaviour, there is a high probability that they would, but we can't know it.<br /><br />I recall (though I can't remember enough of the verbiage to google it) a post where you (rightfully!) pilloried one of the BTs for a "well, if the Liberals were in power, things would be even worse" comment. So, by rights, while we can say that given their past behavior, it is a near certainty that they'd be wetting themselves with appalled glee and shrieking to anyone who would listen if it were anyone but Harper... we can't state this hypothetical as fact.The Artful Nudgerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01440966450040172653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-82696350937338648752009-07-09T12:11:43.993-04:002009-07-09T12:11:43.993-04:00Well, to be fair, Mr. Myers was trying to be provo...Well, to be fair, Mr. Myers was trying to be provocative and elicit offense from Catholics. Harper made a simple mistake and his handlers are trying to squirm their way out of it, without actually admitting that he made a mistake at all. Of course.James Bowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11888307747088266395noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-88703209582943507152009-07-09T08:15:26.031-04:002009-07-09T08:15:26.031-04:00Frankly, I could care less about the waffer.
I d...Frankly, I could care less about the waffer. <br /><br />I do care about the obvious lying Soudas and the PMO are engaged in and the outright hypocrisy of the BTs - some of the same BT who were morally outraged when PZ Meyers did the exact same thing a while back.<br /><br />I wonder what Matthew at the Politic has to say. Or Ste. Nitouche at BBW. Or Our Lady of La Shaidle?<br /><br />When PZ does it, its a horrible insult to Catholics and Christianity, a violation of religious rights worth of outrage and death threats. When Stephen Harper does it, well no biggie...<br /><br />Consistency really is the hobgoblin of small minds.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06941875334878452635noreply@blogger.com