tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post7771475597728219693..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: "But that's DIFFERENT!": Bathroom stall edition.CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-16845315919672279002007-09-01T03:16:00.000-04:002007-09-01T03:16:00.000-04:00Hmmmm ... do you have an online reference somewher...Hmmmm ... do you have an online reference somewhere that clarifies this? If it's true, I'd want to correct the record, of course.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-75291911957013491262007-09-01T00:35:00.000-04:002007-09-01T00:35:00.000-04:00"Except for the inconvenient detail that Monica Le..."Except for the inconvenient detail that Monica Lewinsky was not a White House intern at the time of that affair"<BR/><BR/>Not true. The affair started when she was an intern. Just fact checking for ya. There was a general strike going on while Monica was an unpaid intern - she delivered some pizza to El Presidento, leaned over and snapped her thong at him... and things developed from there. The affair continued after she left the intern job -- which was one of the issues related to the scandal.. Clinton getting his friend Vernon Jordan (I think the name was) to find Monica a spiffy new job after she left the whitehouse.<BR/><BR/>(MW)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-61900603439667776192007-08-31T09:24:00.000-04:002007-08-31T09:24:00.000-04:00Why do the wingnuts bother?The Clinton-Lewinsky is...Why do the wingnuts bother?<BR/><BR/>The Clinton-Lewinsky issue was correctly viewed as a moral lapse (he betrayed his wife) the consequences of which were almost entirely trivial and private.<BR/><BR/>The Craig issue is a moral and <I>legal</I> lapse (he's betraying his wife and public sex is against the law); the consequences of which are also trivial but unfortunately <I>not private.</I> Coupled with Craig's history of opposing measures to curb injustices directed at homosexuals, it reveals a hypocrisy that ends up being harmful to a great many people, who are, incidently, voters.<BR/><BR/>The wingnuts should just shut up about this. They have nothing useful to say.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.com