tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post7088212146013746696..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: As always, I love being right.CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-42813308246434884472007-05-27T00:25:00.000-04:002007-05-27T00:25:00.000-04:00'Shithead', that's very sweet - and I don't even k...'Shithead', that's very sweet - and I don't even know you.<BR/><BR/><I>he predicted comments about the Geneva Convention specifically.</I><BR/><BR/>That's really the split hair that you're wasting our time with here? <BR/><BR/>Excellent point, sir. Bravo. We're all in awe of your dialectical skills. Certainly "Geneva Conventions" should never be read as shorthand for "policies supporting respect for human rights in a time of war". The two concepts are entirely different, as anyone who isn't a shithead can plainly see.Adam Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09643814038940593559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-24811210799126765532007-05-26T23:44:00.000-04:002007-05-26T23:44:00.000-04:00CC predicts that in the aftermath of American sold...CC predicts that in the aftermath of American soldiers being taken prisoner, wingnuts who previously were all in favour of the use of torture would start crying foul....<BR/><BR/>No, shithead, he predicted comments about the Geneva Convention specifically.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-31825996122003898722007-05-26T23:26:00.000-04:002007-05-26T23:26:00.000-04:00And yet, you still cannot deal with the actual con...<I>And yet, you still cannot deal with the actual content of the link you chose to illustrate your feeble point.</I><BR/><BR/>What the heck are you talking about? Let me break it down:<BR/>- CC predicts that in the aftermath of American soldiers being taken prisoner, wingnuts who previously were all in favour of the use of torture would start crying foul<BR/>- MM does just that - in the linked piece. The rank hypocracy is more than a little obvious.<BR/><BR/>Or are you ignoring CC's point and moving on to MM's whine about some perceived lack of outrage from the "human rights brigade"?<BR/><BR/>Well, I'll tell you one thing: most of the "human rights brigade" is primarily concerned with the actions of their own representatives in government and the military, as opposed to the actions of people over whom they have zero influence whatsoever.<BR/><BR/>And I'll tell you another thing: don't mistake (perceived) silence for some kind of approval. If you want approval, go read MM's book on the indefinite incarceration of innocent people.Adam Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09643814038940593559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-82386857382920384232007-05-26T15:21:00.000-04:002007-05-26T15:21:00.000-04:00And yet, you still cannot deal with the actual con...And yet, you still cannot deal with the <B>actual</B> content of the link <B>you</B> chose to illustrate your feeble point. Perhaps you spend too much time courting the hero-worship of arse-licking poltroons like that ti-guy fellow?<BR/><BR/>But then, life's just so much simpler that way, isn't it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-44535043737246544492007-05-26T13:31:00.000-04:002007-05-26T13:31:00.000-04:00The joy of being a bilious harridan; the freedom t...The joy of being a bilious harridan; the freedom to be wildly inconsistent and incoherent.<BR/><BR/>Life is just so much simpler that way...isn't it, lpsxc?Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-50029958083173998912007-05-26T09:22:00.000-04:002007-05-26T09:22:00.000-04:00lpsxc writes:"Your link does not mention the GC. A...lpsxc writes:<BR/><BR/>"<I>Your link does not mention the GC. And you do not attempt to address the content of the link itself.</I>"<BR/><BR/>Ah, yes, I see your problem. This is because I trust that my normal readers are capable of filling in the blanks using their extraordinary powers of critical thought, without being spoon-fed the point I am trying to make.<BR/><BR/>That's why you and I are probably never going to hang out together. Ah, well ... my loss, I'm sure.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-84015951783977586012007-05-26T09:04:00.000-04:002007-05-26T09:04:00.000-04:00Your link does not mention the GC. And you do not...Your link does not mention the GC. And you do not attempt to address the content of the link itself.<BR/><BR/>For all your bullshit, you have proved nothing. And you wonder why you're called moonbat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-61671012782196493552007-05-26T07:18:00.000-04:002007-05-26T07:18:00.000-04:00Ack! Linking to Malkin without warning should be a...Ack! Linking to Malkin without warning should be against the Geneva Conventions, the quaint rules for other people.chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05203633769014796067noreply@blogger.com