tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post286433634948944159..comments2024-03-17T03:55:21.696-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: The Angry, Angry ... Left?CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-43767190011901414842009-02-15T22:07:00.000-05:002009-02-15T22:07:00.000-05:00Once again, LS, I'd advise you to stay out of the ...<I>Once again, LS, I'd advise you to stay out of the legal profession.</I><BR/><BR/>Hey bonehead, you gave that "advice" to boris. You have never given me that advice.<BR/><BR/>Please try to keep your facts straight. They have a big thing about checking that sort of thing on cross-examination.liberal supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01129945625510633921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-75842232713892396402009-02-15T22:06:00.000-05:002009-02-15T22:06:00.000-05:00why did I hear Yosemite Sam's voice in my head jus...<I>why did I hear Yosemite Sam's voice in my head just now</I><BR/><BR/>You heard the silent 'varmint' at the end of that sentence, too? Kewl!Frank Frinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05727863730658037306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-51430403800376735502009-02-15T21:45:00.000-05:002009-02-15T21:45:00.000-05:00As for my own legal plans against Canadian Cynic, ...<I>As for my own legal plans against Canadian Cynic, I'm not going to comment any further on that parcticular matter until such a time as futher comment is warranted. </I><BR/><BR/>why did I hear Yosemite Sam's voice in my head just nowSheenahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11343974714241810943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-10393639685140534952009-02-15T21:12:00.000-05:002009-02-15T21:12:00.000-05:00ROTFLI really do enjoy when Liberal Supporter prov...ROTFL<BR/><BR/>I really <I>do</I> enjoy when Liberal Supporter proves himself to be a complete and utter idiot -- which is basically every time that he opens his mouth.<BR/><BR/>Canadian Cynic was the one who opened his mouth and started whining about statements that were actually 100% factually accurate as somehow being libelous.<BR/><BR/>If he wants to sue over them, I'm fully ready to defend that case and I will gleefully watch that case escalate into criminal proceedings.<BR/><BR/>Which it would. The extremely weak standard of evidence CC is using and his malicious intent speak for themselves.<BR/><BR/>If you weren't irredeemably stupid, you'd know this.<BR/><BR/>Once again, LS, I'd advise you to stay out of the legal profession.<BR/><BR/>As for my own legal plans against Canadian Cynic, I'm not going to comment any further on that parcticular matter until such a time as futher comment is warranted.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-48558501524843110772009-02-15T15:22:00.000-05:002009-02-15T15:22:00.000-05:00'Do tell' was rhetorical. I'm afraid Penthouse let...'Do tell' was rhetorical. I'm afraid Penthouse letters is likely not. <BR/><BR/>wv = "preworaj", destined to be bigger than the ShamWow.Frank Frinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05727863730658037306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-10944473127742842532009-02-15T14:57:00.000-05:002009-02-15T14:57:00.000-05:00Oh come on PR, I used the "you had no date for Val...Oh come on PR, I used the "you had no date for Valentine's" routine over at neo's an hour ago. Please come up with original material.<BR/><BR/>But continuing in that vein, I suspect that in addition to your usual nightly knob polishing, for Valentine's you were polishing the motorized goalposts which you just displayed here.<BR/><BR/>Wasn't it YOU that wants to sue? What happened to that? You must have received a quote from a lawyer, since now you no longer sound like you intend to sue. You instead want <I>someone else</I> to sue you, and you only have to show up and present your "case". You must realize that your case would fail, since you need a lot more than public information and a suggestion that someone inform authorities, such as CAS and the kids' school administration, about an unstable person who could be dangerous in the real world. Criminal harassment involves repeated persistent and unwanted harassment. Calling the cops on someone when there is reason to believe they are a danger to someone is not harassment.<BR/><BR/>So, given the fact that there would be no damages possible for you to make any money out of this, and you would be out of pocket for a lawyer, it makes sense you now want to be sued. What exactly would you be sued for? Libeling a pseudonym? Being a laughable buffoon? Sorry, these are not actionable, but you hope nobody will notice. Instead you expect someone to be as foolish as you are, and sue you in some way that would not be a case. <BR/><BR/>You just want the soapbox. And you want someone else to pay for your soapbox. Typical, really.liberal supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01129945625510633921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-61402803702739556762009-02-15T14:52:00.000-05:002009-02-15T14:52:00.000-05:00Do tell.Oh please -- now poor Patrick is going to ...<I>Do tell.</I><BR/><BR/>Oh please -- now poor Patrick is going to have to find his latest edition of Penthouse Letters to copy from. <BR/><BR/>Ewwwwwwwwwwww.LuLuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03412312541969320536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-83629895945747592152009-02-15T14:47:00.000-05:002009-02-15T14:47:00.000-05:00Was little Patrick (and I do mean that in the 'lit...Was little Patrick (and I do mean that in the 'little Elvis' sense) getting busy yesterday? Do tell.<BR/><BR/>wv = (hehe) "rutro". A faint memory of sex in another era.Frank Frinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05727863730658037306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-73157478094667573642009-02-15T14:26:00.000-05:002009-02-15T14:26:00.000-05:00Oh. My. Dear. Lord.This is how you losers spent Va...Oh. My. <I>Dear</I>. Lord.<BR/><BR/><I>This</I> is how you losers spent Valentine's Day?<BR/><BR/>Holy <I>fuck</I> does that <I>ever</I> say a lot about you.<BR/><BR/>Now, that being said, I simply <I>have</I> to address the following little nugget of dishonesty:<BR/><BR/>"<I>Poor Twatsy ... you know that two can play that game, don't you? Hey, I know ... how about the time you accused me of "stalking Dick Evans' kids to their school"?<BR/><BR/>Really, Twats? I did that? Considering I haven't been to Calgary in over 15 years and -- oh, yeah -- I can't possibly have "stalked them to their school" since I haven't the foggiest idea where their school is.</I>"<BR/><BR/>This particular statement is not only riddled with lies, it's also incredibly stupid.<BR/><BR/>I didn't accuse you of stalking Richard Evans' kids. What I <I>did</I> was accurately state that you encouraged other people to do it for you.<BR/><BR/>You encouraged -- hell, you flat out <I>instructed</I> -- your sycophants to figure out which school Richard Evans' kids go to so they could go there and spread malicious innuendo about him -- malicious innuendo which you yourself were providing them with.<BR/><BR/>So not only do I stand by my comments, but if you want to make a legal issue of them, I <I>invite</I> you to do precisely that. I will happily stand in court, clobber you with your own words, then happily provide them to the judge so he can recommend that charges of conspiracy to commit criminal harassment be pressed against you.<BR/><BR/>My dear fucking <I>god</I> you are a child. You actually want to sit on your blog and fucking preen to other idiots who, like yourself, clearly had nowhere better to be on <I>Valentine's Day</I> than working themselves into a hilariously outraged lather over the idea that someone would challenge their master over libelous comments?<BR/><BR/>I'm going to put it to you this way: it's clear that none of you had dates yesterday. There's also clearly a <I>very</I> good reason why.<BR/><BR/>Idiots.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-85479341508705786142009-02-15T13:20:00.000-05:002009-02-15T13:20:00.000-05:00I remember Pat stating something to the effect tha...I remember Pat stating something to the effect that 'you better not run into me because you don't know what scary (or dangerous or something) is' because I told him "let's meet where I'm at see scary/dangerous."<BR/>I do remember threats, if not explicit, then thinly veiled.mikmikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00366766734839522162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-42937162555242282522009-02-15T12:45:00.000-05:002009-02-15T12:45:00.000-05:00Curiously (but predictably), for someone who was a...Curiously (but predictably), for someone who was all over this thread, Twatsy has mysteriously vanished now that I've called him on his bullshit.<BR/><BR/>I'm guessing he's closeted himself away with a thesaurus, trying desperately to figure how to mangle the English language in order to define as a "child stalker" someone who's never actually, you know, stalked children.<BR/><BR/>Give Twatsy time -- his eventual weaselly, goalpost-shifting rebuttal is generally worth the entertainment value. In a train wreck kind of way.<BR/><BR/>P.S. And, yes, even <I>I'm</I> getting bored with this. You can paddle someone in public only so many times before the novelty wears off.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-36529522290548708232009-02-15T12:35:00.000-05:002009-02-15T12:35:00.000-05:00I missed another PR visit?Waaaaaa!"Show us yer tit...I missed another PR visit?<BR/>Waaaaaa!<BR/><BR/><I>"Show us yer tits, Twatsy!"</I><BR/><BR/>He's a little coy but in the right venue, I think he <A HREF="http://www.patrickross.com" REL="nofollow">would</A>liberal supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01129945625510633921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-72602507772114598012009-02-15T04:59:00.000-05:002009-02-15T04:59:00.000-05:00"Show us yer tits, Twatsy!"Good thinking, Ti-Guy -..."<I>Show us yer tits, Twatsy!</I>"<BR/><BR/>Good thinking, Ti-Guy -- after all, what can possibly go wrong? Oh ... <A HREF="http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=man+boobs&btnG=Search+Images" REL="nofollow">that</A>.<BR/><BR/>I think I just fwew up in my mouf.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-68291086333308132662009-02-15T04:56:00.000-05:002009-02-15T04:56:00.000-05:00Hi, kids ... I'm up and putting on the coffee and ...Hi, kids ... I'm up and putting on the coffee and I notice Twats has vanished again, which is <I>exactly</I> what happens each and every time he realizes he just had his nads handed to him. It's what happened after I mocked him for predicting <A HREF="http://canadiancynic.blogspot.com/2009/01/i-dont-think-this-ones-going-to-get-old.html" REL="nofollow">no federal deficit</A>, and it just happened here as Twats realized his claims were pure shash, given that I can provide links to that effect.<BR/><BR/>Here's some free advice, Twatsy -- <I>stay</I> at the kids' table this time. The grownups are trying to talk here.<BR/><BR/>Loser.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-27080704969389448222009-02-15T00:43:00.000-05:002009-02-15T00:43:00.000-05:00Man, some people just don't when to stop, sheesh, ...Man, some people just don't when to stop, sheesh, even Anonologue knew enough to drop the bone, tuck tail and run for cover,... and it has been nearly three years since we heard from that scumbag blogger.Zorpheoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09618889126077232837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-80193552944268206032009-02-14T23:50:00.001-05:002009-02-14T23:50:00.001-05:00Ohferchrissakes - if someone somewhere wasn't thre...<I>Ohferchrissakes - if someone somewhere wasn't threatening that drama queen with something, he'd have to make him/her up.</I><BR/>Seems that way...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-70481190408150202232009-02-14T23:50:00.000-05:002009-02-14T23:50:00.000-05:00Gawd, we need something new to update this boring ...Gawd, we need something new to update this boring drama.<BR/><BR/>Show us yer tits, Twatsy!Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-47512106354259815232009-02-14T23:49:00.000-05:002009-02-14T23:49:00.000-05:001) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard E...<I>1) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard Evans. </I><BR/>Richard is an other funny fucker - I'm still waiting for him to sue me as he has said he would....<BR/>Maybe the NAMBLA obsessed too busy jerking off to little boys or whatever he likes to do...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-54128692491382612142009-02-14T23:01:00.000-05:002009-02-14T23:01:00.000-05:001) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard E...1) We're talking about you, Patrick. Not Richard Evans. <BR/><BR/>2) "Irreedeemably dogmatic and obtuse"? Oh, I like that, especially coming from someone who self-identifiies as <I>asshole</I>.<BR/> <BR/><BR/>3) Speaking of which, I often feel pity for people who feel they must constantly use such a term as self-descriptor. I supect they're suffering from some developmental handicap or mental health issue that either translates into some sort of perpetual teenage psycho-emotional state, or some deep seated self-loathing. Because, really, who wants to be known as an asshole? I don't know you from jack, so perhaps there's some other perfectly rational reason for your constant petulance and obnoxiousness, but I can't think of what that might be. <BR/><BR/>4) You appear to fit the CC (no pun intended) definition of threat of assault, so that is what I called you on. If you care to explain why your post does not fit this definition, have at it, because that would be a lot more credible than advising me to stay away from the legal profession.Borishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00952672409601421466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-68648979172474916632009-02-14T22:50:00.000-05:002009-02-14T22:50:00.000-05:00P.P.S. I'm going to bed now, but I'll make sure I...P.P.S. I'm going to bed now, but I'll make sure I check first thing in the morning as to how Twatsy shifted the goalposts overnight. You know it's coming. Yes, you do.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1102302062881526762009-02-14T22:41:00.000-05:002009-02-14T22:41:00.000-05:00P.S. Just to drive this home, let me reproduce Di...P.S. Just to drive this home, let me reproduce Dick Evans' own words from that last link, where he hoofs Twatsy in the jewels good and proper:<BR/><BR/>"<I>I've not complained that my personal information was posted. CC's correct in his assertion that I posted my children's names myself. I don't have a problem with that.</I><BR/><BR/>So as for posting Dick's personal info about his kids, if you have a problem with that, Twats, feel free to take it up with Dick.<BR/><BR/>Loser.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-20149944033155786932009-02-14T22:38:00.000-05:002009-02-14T22:38:00.000-05:00Oh, dear ... I'm guessing that this is one of thos...Oh, dear ... I'm guessing that this is one of those times where Twatsy is going to get all pedantic and demand that words should be interpreted, you know, correctly. As opposed to all the rest of the times when he insists on mangling the English language when it suits him.<BR/><BR/>Poor Twatsy ... you know that two can play that game, don't you? Hey, I know ... how about the time you accused me of "<A HREF="http://nexusofassholery.blogspot.com/2008/09/canadian-cynic-canadians-are-stupid.html" REL="nofollow">stalking Dick Evans' kids to their school</A>"?<BR/><BR/>"<I>After all, there's something inherently mean about expressing amusement about an assassination attempt on a Canadian politician. Encouraging people to go after a political opponent through his children? To the point of stalking them to their school?</I>"<BR/><BR/>Really, Twats? I did <I>that</I>? Considering I haven't been to Calgary in over 15 years and -- oh, yeah -- I can't possibly have "stalked them to their school" since I haven't the foggiest idea where their school is.<BR/><BR/>So, Twats, that libel suit? Bring it the fuck on. And we'll see what horrendous shit you can get into after publicly accusing me of being a child stalker when I can trivially demonstrate that that is pure bullshit.<BR/><BR/>Feel free to find a good lawyer, Twats. And make sure you point out the libelous accusation you made against me above. Then see how long it takes him to stop laughing before he boots your sorry ass out onto the street.<BR/><BR/>P.S. And as for the hideous sin of posting Dick Evans' address, well, holy fuck, Twatsy, but you're <A HREF="http://canadiancynic.blogspot.com/2008/03/closing-book-on-dickie-nambla-evans.html" REL="nofollow">behind on your reading</A>.<BR/><BR/>Loser.CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-46542519157256713312009-02-14T22:29:00.000-05:002009-02-14T22:29:00.000-05:00Boris, if you hadn't previously proven yourself to...Boris, if you hadn't previously proven yourself to be irredeemably dogmatic and obtuse, I would be shocked to hear that from you.<BR/><BR/>My sincere advice for you is to stay out of the legal profession.<BR/><BR/><I>Not to mention</I> the matter of Canadian Cynic publishing Richard Evans' address and actively and explicitly encouraging people to stalk his children.<BR/><BR/>Yet I've never seen or heard a word of protest to that <I>anywhere</I> from yourself.<BR/><BR/>That actually fits the criminal definition of criminal harassment. But I guess it's OK when <I>your</I> side does that, isn't it?Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-52049631353179853382009-02-14T22:18:00.000-05:002009-02-14T22:18:00.000-05:00According the Criminal Code:264.1 (1)Every one com...According the <A HREF="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46/bo-ga:l_VIII-gb:s_244//en#anchorbo-ga:l_VIII-gb:s_244" REL="nofollow">Criminal Code</A>:<BR/><I>264.1 (1)Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat<BR/><BR/>(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;<BR/>...<BR/></I><BR/>You have done exactly that Patrick. The wording is loose enough to capture the "threat" aspect even if, in your so cleverly worded post, you don't explicitly state that you personally are going to assault CC. <BR/><BR/>wv=muntra (hafta use that somewhere, good word_Borishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00952672409601421466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-74200291938090523862009-02-14T21:55:00.000-05:002009-02-14T21:55:00.000-05:00ROTFLLulu, I do so much enjoy when you cretins pro...ROTFL<BR/><BR/>Lulu, I <I>do</I> so much enjoy when you cretins prove your functional illiteracy.<BR/><BR/>This particular post in question wasn't a threat of physical violence. It's a <I>promise</I> to reveal his vile attitudes and statements to his friends, family, and neighbours.<BR/><BR/>Glad I could clear this up for you. You may now resume lying about the entire affair.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.com