tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post115912794052193585..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: Freedom of speech, except on Tuesdays.CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1159198001723447862006-09-25T11:26:00.000-04:002006-09-25T11:26:00.000-04:00I confess that I just read kKKates name and then s...I confess that I just read kKKates name and then scrolled down to read the quote.<BR/><BR/>And I thought for a brief few moments.. "Holy smokes.. Kate's gotten a therapist, She's in counselling. She's developed some self-awareness. Good for her. That's great"<BR/><BR/>But then I realized it wasn't quoting her.Somena Womanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05010535817469581311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1159153326112161362006-09-24T23:02:00.000-04:002006-09-24T23:02:00.000-04:00This is what he said: "I would challenge anybody ...This is what he said: <BR/><BR/>"I would challenge anybody to show me a post of mine that is anti-woman, as opposed to merely anti-feminist." (August 30, 2006, 5:45 p.m.)<BR/><BR/>This is what Ilkka Kokkarinen said:<BR/><BR/>"There should be some central planning mechanism that would allocate each woman a bunch of needy men to satisfy each week. I think that this would be only fair: if feminists think that they are entitled to 50% of wealth created by productive men that these men would selfishly want to keep to themselves, then those men should be correspondingly entitled to 50% of sex that the feminists are able to provide to men but selfishly choose not to." <BR/><BR/>He said that in a blog last April. (Got it from a Google cache.) Someone, he explained September 20, 2006, ran it down and sent a copy of the it to the Women's Center at Ryerson University, where he works, teaching school.<BR/><BR/>What you saw on his post today is (a) the wages of sin, and (b) his attempt to retain his position.<BR/><BR/>You can argue all you want back and forth about censorship and freedom of speech, but what it comes down to is that women were scorned.<BR/><BR/>And yes, it is an apology.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com