tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post110601616942632854..comments2024-03-28T03:54:21.932-04:00Comments on Canadian Cynic: More bogus, right-wing, Republican "persecution", college style.CChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106366625635513322005-01-21T23:03:00.000-05:002005-01-21T23:03:00.000-05:00I never even addressed Al-Qloushi's accusation aga...<I>I never even addressed Al-Qloushi's accusation against Professor Woolcock.</I>roflmbo!!! 'More bogus, right-wing, Republican "persecution", college style.' Sure looks to me like you addressed the accusation as "bogus" and mockingly refering to it as "persecution."Jay McHuehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01708225059286944653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106320752718498102005-01-21T10:19:00.000-05:002005-01-21T10:19:00.000-05:00From CC:
(Additional amusing observation.)
I did...From CC:<br /><br />(Additional amusing observation.)<br /><br />I didn't even notice this the first time around, but <A HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.outsidethebeltway.com%2Farchives%2F8841%23comment-32007">one of the comments regarding Al-Qloushi's paper</A> is one of the funnier things I've read in a while regarding his statement that, "The United States constitution might have excluded the majority of people at the time. <B>But it progressed</B> ..."<br /><br />Responds one commenter:<br /><br />"It’s interesting to see conservatives (who presumably back the President’s desire to see more ‘strict constructionists” in the judiciary) arguing for the progressive, changing nature of the Constitution. Do I see a self-contradiction raising its head?"<br /><br />Yes. Yes, you do. Who needs Comedy Central when you have Republicans?CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106318692421603752005-01-21T09:44:00.000-05:002005-01-21T09:44:00.000-05:00From CC:
As much as I would like to ignore Mr. Mc...From CC:<br /><br />As much as I would like to ignore Mr. McHue, his latest screed is a perfect example of what you should have come to expect from my detractors, and from conservative hacks in general. Mr. McHue howls:<br /><br />"<I>So what? You've done ABSO-FRAGGIN-LUTELY NOTHING other than smear, smear, smear to "disprove" Al-Qloushi's claim against the professor in question</I>..."<br /><br />Which is amusing since, as absolutely everyone can read, I never even addressed Al-Qloushi's accusation against Professor Woolcock. I have no way of knowing if Woolcock told Al-Qloushi to get mental help, just as McHue has no way of knowing that, either. Which is why I didn't talk about it. Not surprisingly, since McHue can't refute the rest of my post, he fabricates what I wrote and attacks <B>that</B>.<br /><br />And we all know what <B>that's</B> called by now, don't we?CChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11406057201126015750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106204931056734132005-01-20T02:08:00.000-05:002005-01-20T02:08:00.000-05:00"Al-Qloushi happens to be president of the Foothil..."Al-Qloushi happens to be president of the Foothill College Republicans"<br /><br />So what? You've done ABSO-FRAGGIN-LUTELY NOTHING other than smear, smear, smear to "disprove" Al-Qloushi's claim against the professor in question:<br /><br />-"reliable right-wing media" (used sarcastically)<br /><br />-"frothing and howling in the right-wing blogosphere, as numerous conservative wankers, dittoheads and howler monkeys" (smear)<br /><br />-"that college's Young Republicans who, of course, only care about the integrity and sanctity of the academic progress" (sarcasm)<br /><br />-"some actual investigative journalism" (smear)<br /><br />-"Al-Qloushi happens to be president of the Foothill College Republicans -- a fact the group's press materials neglected to mention" (smear)<br /><br />-"the essay itself" (purported, but entirely unconfirmed, copy of the essay - doesn't stop you from using it as the real thing, though)<br /><br />-"a piece of shit" (smear)<br /><br />"And thus endeth the story."<br /><br />Your story gets an F and qualifies you for a remedial course in brain-usage.Jay McHuehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01708225059286944653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106178647439096292005-01-19T18:50:00.000-05:002005-01-19T18:50:00.000-05:00Jay-- really, what exactly about CCs posts sucks? ...Jay-- really, what exactly about CCs posts sucks? that CC attempts to dissect what is reported in our useless media outlets? that he filters through fundamentalist christian BS? that he expresses opinions contrary to those of mainstream America? you seeming a neo-Nazi, one would think you would appreciate his efforts. but no, you think he sucks simply because you disagree 99% of the time. <br />Even though I am a liberal, I have the utmost respect for conservatives who take time to FULLY, ARTICULATELY, research and express their opinions. I absolutely take the time to consider what they suggest. while I may be an athiest, I also fully respect those who choose to practice religion--only if they do not proseletyse me and also respect my life choices as an individual protected by our bill of rights. You see, this whole left-wing right-wing thing is putting labels on ideas, making things black and white. Life is shades of gray. Life is treating others the way you wish to be treated. You dont have to believe in god to believe in that. <br />You want to debate with this guy, personally I think you'll lose. Debating is not belittling and harassing a fellow blogger. Please, grow up and write some researched, articulate postings and the rest of us who read CC might actually pay attention.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6708375.post-1106028569747321822005-01-18T01:09:00.000-05:002005-01-18T01:09:00.000-05:00Great post, cc!Great post, cc!Cathie from Canadahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11418899090537597360noreply@blogger.com