Wednesday, May 26, 2010

And I'd check the watermark on the paper if I were you.


That 2004 Harper coalition proposal, and the more recent one when others proposed something similar? Totally, totally different. Because shut up.

And fuck off. That, too.

OH, DEAR: The comments section there is a must-read. Seriously.

17 comments:

Sparky said...

"nowhere does Stephen Harper suggest that the three opposition parties wish to form a government. NOWHERE"
That's his proof? 'Cause Harper didn't use the word 'coalition' in his letter?? Can these people even read??
That's like dismissing facts 'cause someone used quotation marks around a paraphrase...

Cherniak_WTF said...

Can these people even read??
Some can read but the bigger question is if they understand.


That answer is "no".

CC said...

"Hey, I'm not saying that I'll kill your family if you testify. I'm just saying that that's a nice family you got there, and it'd be a shame if anything happened to them."

(Time passes.)

"Your Honour, I can assure you that at no time did my client explicitly threaten the victim. Never. Not one word."

Christ, but these people are fucking stupid.

double nickel said...

And right on cue...twatsy appears.

Cameron Campbell said...

"nowhere does Stephen Harper suggest that the three opposition parties wish to form a government. NOWHERE"

So their contention is that they sent a letter to the GG (or drafted one - I'm not clear on this) that mentions the three other parties, points out that combined they have more MPs that the current government and it was NOT about forming a coalition government?

The Seer said...

And furthermore, you people can quit complaining about the cold and the snow and the buses in Ottawa because it just got named the fourteenth most liveable city in the world. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/26/best-places-to-live-in-th_n_590409.html#s93679

Gene Rayburn said...

Coming from the #4 city, your snow and cold sucks and so do your busses.

Dr.Dawg said...

Who the hell is Shermer, and why should any of us care?

CK said...

Am I that slow or does anyone else really not understand what DM is trying to tell us? Bible? Swearing? Youtube link? Does all this somehow mesh together?

Maybe I'm getting old.

CK said...

I these connies hated nuances...that they simply confused them...

I guess not when it applies to them.

double nickel said...

DM = word salad. In other words, bull goose looney.

CK said...

And, DM, who the hell are you really?

Sparky said...

Rats--all 'non-relevant' comments deleted...
Though one of jackasses stayed. And here's something interesting (though a little off-topic)--
Shit-fer-brains stated thus--"All this being said, you can try all you want to read "coalition government" into "consider all options". You have to disavow all the other options at the GG's disposal to do that, which frequently you've proven yourself more than willing to do."
So, according to mullet-boy, one should not jump to the one option of 'coalition gov't' because what was inferred was 'all options'...
However, when we talk about pro-choice vs pro-life, Patty wants the world to know that pro-choice atually and exclusively means 'pro abortion' and should be labeled as such...
Yeah... how about those triangles...

liberal supporter said...

Funny how neither letter to the GG had the word "coalition" in it anywhere.

What was most hilarious in the little flame war was PR lecturing me about "no means no", probably because he has finally learned "no means no" when it comes to showing up here.

Sparky said...

Oh for the love of all things!!

Hey DM--take care of that there plank in your own eye before you worry about the specks of dust in others...

Ahh, but this advice is like pearls before the swine...

liberal supporter said...

Get thee away from me, DM. You are a blasphemer. Repent, pray for guidance and think over your life, its purpose, and why you are wasting it.

Metro said...

DM, insulting your opponents does you little credit. And harms your own chances of salvation.

Does the Bible not say "If a man shall strike you on one cheek, turn to him the other cheek," in the very words of Jesus himself?

You don't seem to have mastered the required level of forgiveness to be so certain of the damnation of others. I fear your soul, small, worthless, and mean though it is, is in danger.

Please, I beg you, turn back to God now and save yourself. It's not too late. Otherwise you are surely damned out of your own mouth. Or off your own keyboard, as it were.

In fact, you should eschew the internet entirely so that you can no longer be tempted into the deadly sins of wrath, sloth, and pride.

It may be your only chance. Please take it.